Cargando…

Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has increased and malaria has decreased globally, but malaria transmission remains high in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and insecticide resistance threatens current progress. Eave tubes are a new tool for the targeted delivery of insecticid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sternberg, Eleanore D., Cook, Jackie, Ahoua Alou, Ludovic P., Aoura, Carine J., Assi, Serge Brice, Doudou, Dimi Théodore, Koffi, A. Alphonsine, N’Guessan, Raphael, Oumbouke, Welbeck A., Smith, Rachel A., Worrall, Eve, Kleinschmidt, Immo, Thomas, Matthew B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5746-5
_version_ 1783340693150760960
author Sternberg, Eleanore D.
Cook, Jackie
Ahoua Alou, Ludovic P.
Aoura, Carine J.
Assi, Serge Brice
Doudou, Dimi Théodore
Koffi, A. Alphonsine
N’Guessan, Raphael
Oumbouke, Welbeck A.
Smith, Rachel A.
Worrall, Eve
Kleinschmidt, Immo
Thomas, Matthew B.
author_facet Sternberg, Eleanore D.
Cook, Jackie
Ahoua Alou, Ludovic P.
Aoura, Carine J.
Assi, Serge Brice
Doudou, Dimi Théodore
Koffi, A. Alphonsine
N’Guessan, Raphael
Oumbouke, Welbeck A.
Smith, Rachel A.
Worrall, Eve
Kleinschmidt, Immo
Thomas, Matthew B.
author_sort Sternberg, Eleanore D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has increased and malaria has decreased globally, but malaria transmission remains high in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and insecticide resistance threatens current progress. Eave tubes are a new tool for the targeted delivery of insecticides against mosquitoes attempting to enter houses. The primary objective of this trial is to test whether screening plus eave tubes (SET) provides protection against malaria, on top of universal coverage with LLINs in an area of intense pyrethroid resistance. The trial will also assess acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-armed, cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effect of SET on clinical malaria incidence in children living in central Côte d’Ivoire. Forty villages will be selected based on population size and the proportion of houses suitable for modification with SET. Using restricted randomization, half the villages will be assigned to the treatment arm (SET + LLINs) and the remainder will be assigned to the control arm (LLINs only). In both arms, LLINs will be distributed and in the treatment arm, householders will be offered SET. Fifty children aged six months to eight years old will be enrolled from randomly selected households in each of the 40 villages. Cohorts will be cleared of malaria parasites at the start of the study and one year after recruitment, and will be monitored for clinical malaria case incidence by active case detection over two years. Mosquito densities will be assessed using CDC light traps and human landing catches and a subset of Anopheles mosquitoes will be examined for parity status and tested for sporozoite infection. Acceptability of SET will be monitored using surveys and focus groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis will measure the incremental cost per case averted and per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted of adding SET to LLINs. Economic and financial costs will be estimated from societal and provider perspective using standard economic evaluation methods. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first evaluation of the epidemiological impact of SET. Trial findings will show whether SET is a viable, cost-effective technology for malaria control in Côte d’Ivoire and possibly elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18145556, registered on 01 February 2017 – retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60526182018-07-20 Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial Sternberg, Eleanore D. Cook, Jackie Ahoua Alou, Ludovic P. Aoura, Carine J. Assi, Serge Brice Doudou, Dimi Théodore Koffi, A. Alphonsine N’Guessan, Raphael Oumbouke, Welbeck A. Smith, Rachel A. Worrall, Eve Kleinschmidt, Immo Thomas, Matthew B. BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has increased and malaria has decreased globally, but malaria transmission remains high in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and insecticide resistance threatens current progress. Eave tubes are a new tool for the targeted delivery of insecticides against mosquitoes attempting to enter houses. The primary objective of this trial is to test whether screening plus eave tubes (SET) provides protection against malaria, on top of universal coverage with LLINs in an area of intense pyrethroid resistance. The trial will also assess acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-armed, cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effect of SET on clinical malaria incidence in children living in central Côte d’Ivoire. Forty villages will be selected based on population size and the proportion of houses suitable for modification with SET. Using restricted randomization, half the villages will be assigned to the treatment arm (SET + LLINs) and the remainder will be assigned to the control arm (LLINs only). In both arms, LLINs will be distributed and in the treatment arm, householders will be offered SET. Fifty children aged six months to eight years old will be enrolled from randomly selected households in each of the 40 villages. Cohorts will be cleared of malaria parasites at the start of the study and one year after recruitment, and will be monitored for clinical malaria case incidence by active case detection over two years. Mosquito densities will be assessed using CDC light traps and human landing catches and a subset of Anopheles mosquitoes will be examined for parity status and tested for sporozoite infection. Acceptability of SET will be monitored using surveys and focus groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis will measure the incremental cost per case averted and per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted of adding SET to LLINs. Economic and financial costs will be estimated from societal and provider perspective using standard economic evaluation methods. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first evaluation of the epidemiological impact of SET. Trial findings will show whether SET is a viable, cost-effective technology for malaria control in Côte d’Ivoire and possibly elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18145556, registered on 01 February 2017 – retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052618/ /pubmed/30021543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5746-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sternberg, Eleanore D.
Cook, Jackie
Ahoua Alou, Ludovic P.
Aoura, Carine J.
Assi, Serge Brice
Doudou, Dimi Théodore
Koffi, A. Alphonsine
N’Guessan, Raphael
Oumbouke, Welbeck A.
Smith, Rachel A.
Worrall, Eve
Kleinschmidt, Immo
Thomas, Matthew B.
Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central côte d’ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5746-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sternbergeleanored evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cookjackie evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahouaalouludovicp evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aouracarinej evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT assisergebrice evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doudoudimitheodore evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koffiaalphonsine evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nguessanraphael evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oumboukewelbecka evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smithrachela evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT worralleve evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleinschmidtimmo evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasmatthewb evaluatingtheimpactofscreeningpluseavetubesonmalariatransmissioncomparedtocurrentbestpracticeincentralcotedivoireatwoarmedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial