Cargando…

Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers

BACKGROUND: Leadership has been identified as an influential factor in implementation processes in healthcare organizations. However, the processes through which leaders affect implementation outcomes are largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to analyse how managers interpret and make sense...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uvhagen, Håkan, Hasson, Henna, Hansson, Johan, von Knorring, Mia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3360-y
_version_ 1783340704850771968
author Uvhagen, Håkan
Hasson, Henna
Hansson, Johan
von Knorring, Mia
author_facet Uvhagen, Håkan
Hasson, Henna
Hansson, Johan
von Knorring, Mia
author_sort Uvhagen, Håkan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leadership has been identified as an influential factor in implementation processes in healthcare organizations. However, the processes through which leaders affect implementation outcomes are largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to analyse how managers interpret and make sense of a large scale top-down implementation initiative and what implications this has for the implementation process. This was studied at the implementation of an academic primary healthcare initiative covering 210 primary healthcare centres in central Sweden. The aim of the initiative was to integrate research and education into regular primary healthcare services. METHODS: The study builds on 16 in-depth individual semi-structured interviews with all managers (n = 8) who had operative responsibility for the implementation. Each manager was interviewed twice during the initial phase of the implementation. Data were analysed using a thematic approach guided by theory on managerial role taking based on the Transforming Experience Framework. RESULTS: How the managers interpreted and made sense of the implementation task built on three factors: how they perceived the different parts of the initiative, how they perceived themselves in relation to these parts, and the resources available for the initiative. Based on how they combined these three factors the managers chose to integrate or separate the different parts of the initiative in their management of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: This research emphasizes that managers in healthcare seem to have a substantial impact on how and to what extent different tasks are addressed and prioritized in top-down implementation processes. This has policy implications. To achieve intended implementation outcomes, the authors recognize the necessity of an early and on-going dialogue about how the implementation is perceived by the managers responsible for the implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3360-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60526672018-07-20 Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers Uvhagen, Håkan Hasson, Henna Hansson, Johan von Knorring, Mia BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Leadership has been identified as an influential factor in implementation processes in healthcare organizations. However, the processes through which leaders affect implementation outcomes are largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to analyse how managers interpret and make sense of a large scale top-down implementation initiative and what implications this has for the implementation process. This was studied at the implementation of an academic primary healthcare initiative covering 210 primary healthcare centres in central Sweden. The aim of the initiative was to integrate research and education into regular primary healthcare services. METHODS: The study builds on 16 in-depth individual semi-structured interviews with all managers (n = 8) who had operative responsibility for the implementation. Each manager was interviewed twice during the initial phase of the implementation. Data were analysed using a thematic approach guided by theory on managerial role taking based on the Transforming Experience Framework. RESULTS: How the managers interpreted and made sense of the implementation task built on three factors: how they perceived the different parts of the initiative, how they perceived themselves in relation to these parts, and the resources available for the initiative. Based on how they combined these three factors the managers chose to integrate or separate the different parts of the initiative in their management of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: This research emphasizes that managers in healthcare seem to have a substantial impact on how and to what extent different tasks are addressed and prioritized in top-down implementation processes. This has policy implications. To achieve intended implementation outcomes, the authors recognize the necessity of an early and on-going dialogue about how the implementation is perceived by the managers responsible for the implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3360-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052667/ /pubmed/30021569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3360-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Uvhagen, Håkan
Hasson, Henna
Hansson, Johan
von Knorring, Mia
Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title_full Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title_fullStr Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title_full_unstemmed Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title_short Leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
title_sort leading top-down implementation processes: a qualitative study on the role of managers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3360-y
work_keys_str_mv AT uvhagenhakan leadingtopdownimplementationprocessesaqualitativestudyontheroleofmanagers
AT hassonhenna leadingtopdownimplementationprocessesaqualitativestudyontheroleofmanagers
AT hanssonjohan leadingtopdownimplementationprocessesaqualitativestudyontheroleofmanagers
AT vonknorringmia leadingtopdownimplementationprocessesaqualitativestudyontheroleofmanagers