Cargando…
The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3 |
_version_ | 1783340705354088448 |
---|---|
author | Naylor, Justine M. Hart, Andrew Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Xuan, Wei |
author_facet | Naylor, Justine M. Hart, Andrew Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Xuan, Wei |
author_sort | Naylor, Justine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, propensity score matched cohort involving 12 private hospitals across five Australian States. Patients undergoing THA secondary to osteoarthritis were included. Those receiving inpatient rehabilitation for reasons other than choice or who experienced significant health events within 90-days post-surgery were excluded. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not receive inpatient rehabilitation for patient-reported hip pain and function (Oxford Hip Score, OHS) and ‘today’ health rating (EuroQol 0–100 scale). Rehabilitation provider charges were also estimated and compared. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients (123 pairs, mean age 67 (10) yr., 66% female) were matched on 19 covariates for their propensity to receive inpatient rehabilitation. No statistically nor clinically significant between-group differences were observed [OHS median difference (IQR): 0 (− 3, 3), P = 0.60; 0 (− 1 to 1), P = 0.91, at 90 and 365-days, respectively; EuroQol scale median difference 0 (− 10, 12), P = 0.24; 0 (− 10, 10), P = 0.49; 5 (− 10, 15), P = 0.09, at 35-, 90- and 365-days, respectively]. Median rehabilitation provider charges were 10-fold higher for those who received inpatient rehabilitation [median difference $7582 (5649, 10,249), P < 0.001]. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the results of the primary analyses. CONCLUSION: Utilization of inpatient rehabilitation pathways following THA appears to be low value healthcare. Sustainability of inpatient rehabilitation models may be enhanced if inpatient rehabilitation is reserved for those most impaired or who have limited social supports. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899443. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6052669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60526692018-07-20 The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort Naylor, Justine M. Hart, Andrew Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Xuan, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, propensity score matched cohort involving 12 private hospitals across five Australian States. Patients undergoing THA secondary to osteoarthritis were included. Those receiving inpatient rehabilitation for reasons other than choice or who experienced significant health events within 90-days post-surgery were excluded. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not receive inpatient rehabilitation for patient-reported hip pain and function (Oxford Hip Score, OHS) and ‘today’ health rating (EuroQol 0–100 scale). Rehabilitation provider charges were also estimated and compared. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients (123 pairs, mean age 67 (10) yr., 66% female) were matched on 19 covariates for their propensity to receive inpatient rehabilitation. No statistically nor clinically significant between-group differences were observed [OHS median difference (IQR): 0 (− 3, 3), P = 0.60; 0 (− 1 to 1), P = 0.91, at 90 and 365-days, respectively; EuroQol scale median difference 0 (− 10, 12), P = 0.24; 0 (− 10, 10), P = 0.49; 5 (− 10, 15), P = 0.09, at 35-, 90- and 365-days, respectively]. Median rehabilitation provider charges were 10-fold higher for those who received inpatient rehabilitation [median difference $7582 (5649, 10,249), P < 0.001]. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the results of the primary analyses. CONCLUSION: Utilization of inpatient rehabilitation pathways following THA appears to be low value healthcare. Sustainability of inpatient rehabilitation models may be enhanced if inpatient rehabilitation is reserved for those most impaired or who have limited social supports. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899443. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052669/ /pubmed/30021552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Naylor, Justine M. Hart, Andrew Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Xuan, Wei The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title | The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title_full | The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title_short | The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
title_sort | effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naylorjustinem theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT hartandrew theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT mittalrajat theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT harrisiana theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT xuanwei theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT naylorjustinem effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT hartandrew effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT mittalrajat effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT harrisiana effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort AT xuanwei effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort |