Cargando…

The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort

BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naylor, Justine M., Hart, Andrew, Mittal, Rajat, Harris, Ian A., Xuan, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3
_version_ 1783340705354088448
author Naylor, Justine M.
Hart, Andrew
Mittal, Rajat
Harris, Ian A.
Xuan, Wei
author_facet Naylor, Justine M.
Hart, Andrew
Mittal, Rajat
Harris, Ian A.
Xuan, Wei
author_sort Naylor, Justine M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, propensity score matched cohort involving 12 private hospitals across five Australian States. Patients undergoing THA secondary to osteoarthritis were included. Those receiving inpatient rehabilitation for reasons other than choice or who experienced significant health events within 90-days post-surgery were excluded. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not receive inpatient rehabilitation for patient-reported hip pain and function (Oxford Hip Score, OHS) and ‘today’ health rating (EuroQol 0–100 scale). Rehabilitation provider charges were also estimated and compared. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients (123 pairs, mean age 67 (10) yr., 66% female) were matched on 19 covariates for their propensity to receive inpatient rehabilitation. No statistically nor clinically significant between-group differences were observed [OHS median difference (IQR): 0 (− 3, 3), P = 0.60; 0 (− 1 to 1), P = 0.91, at 90 and 365-days, respectively; EuroQol scale median difference 0 (− 10, 12), P = 0.24; 0 (− 10, 10), P = 0.49; 5 (− 10, 15), P = 0.09, at 35-, 90- and 365-days, respectively]. Median rehabilitation provider charges were 10-fold higher for those who received inpatient rehabilitation [median difference $7582 (5649, 10,249), P <  0.001]. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the results of the primary analyses. CONCLUSION: Utilization of inpatient rehabilitation pathways following THA appears to be low value healthcare. Sustainability of inpatient rehabilitation models may be enhanced if inpatient rehabilitation is reserved for those most impaired or who have limited social supports. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899443. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60526692018-07-20 The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort Naylor, Justine M. Hart, Andrew Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Xuan, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home. METHODS: Prospective, propensity score matched cohort involving 12 private hospitals across five Australian States. Patients undergoing THA secondary to osteoarthritis were included. Those receiving inpatient rehabilitation for reasons other than choice or who experienced significant health events within 90-days post-surgery were excluded. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not receive inpatient rehabilitation for patient-reported hip pain and function (Oxford Hip Score, OHS) and ‘today’ health rating (EuroQol 0–100 scale). Rehabilitation provider charges were also estimated and compared. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients (123 pairs, mean age 67 (10) yr., 66% female) were matched on 19 covariates for their propensity to receive inpatient rehabilitation. No statistically nor clinically significant between-group differences were observed [OHS median difference (IQR): 0 (− 3, 3), P = 0.60; 0 (− 1 to 1), P = 0.91, at 90 and 365-days, respectively; EuroQol scale median difference 0 (− 10, 12), P = 0.24; 0 (− 10, 10), P = 0.49; 5 (− 10, 15), P = 0.09, at 35-, 90- and 365-days, respectively]. Median rehabilitation provider charges were 10-fold higher for those who received inpatient rehabilitation [median difference $7582 (5649, 10,249), P <  0.001]. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the results of the primary analyses. CONCLUSION: Utilization of inpatient rehabilitation pathways following THA appears to be low value healthcare. Sustainability of inpatient rehabilitation models may be enhanced if inpatient rehabilitation is reserved for those most impaired or who have limited social supports. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899443. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052669/ /pubmed/30021552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Naylor, Justine M.
Hart, Andrew
Mittal, Rajat
Harris, Ian A.
Xuan, Wei
The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title_full The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title_fullStr The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title_short The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
title_sort effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3
work_keys_str_mv AT naylorjustinem theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT hartandrew theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT mittalrajat theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT harrisiana theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT xuanwei theeffectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT naylorjustinem effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT hartandrew effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT mittalrajat effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT harrisiana effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort
AT xuanwei effectivenessofinpatientrehabilitationafteruncomplicatedtotalhiparthroplastyapropensityscorematchedcohort