Cargando…

Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene

BACKGROUND: Small hydrophobic (SH) gene is one of the mostly diverse genomic regions of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV). Its coding region constitutes less than 50% of the complete gene length, enabling SH gene to be highly variable and the SH protein highly conserved. In standard HRSV mole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena, Slovic, Anamarija, Ljubin-Sternak, Sunčanica, Mlinarić Galinović, Gordana, Forcic, Dubravko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1020-9
_version_ 1783340714110746624
author Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena
Slovic, Anamarija
Ljubin-Sternak, Sunčanica
Mlinarić Galinović, Gordana
Forcic, Dubravko
author_facet Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena
Slovic, Anamarija
Ljubin-Sternak, Sunčanica
Mlinarić Galinović, Gordana
Forcic, Dubravko
author_sort Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small hydrophobic (SH) gene is one of the mostly diverse genomic regions of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV). Its coding region constitutes less than 50% of the complete gene length, enabling SH gene to be highly variable and the SH protein highly conserved. In standard HRSV molecular epidemiology studies, solely sequences of the second hypervariable region of the glycoprotein gene (HVR2) are analyzed. To what extent do the strains identical in HVR2 differ elsewhere in genomes is rarely investigated. Our goal was to investigate whether diversity and inter-genotype differences observed for HVR2 are also present in the SH gene. METHODS: We sequenced 198 clinical samples collected within a limited area and time frame. In this HRSV collection, rapid and significant changes in HVR2 occurred. RESULTS: Over 20% of strains from this pool (containing HRSV genotypes NA1, ON1, GA5, BA9 and BA10) would be incorrectly assumed to be identical to another strain if only the HVR2 region was analysed. The majority of differences found in SH gene were located in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR). Seven indels were detected, one was genotype GA5 specific. An in-frame deletion of 9 nucleotides (coding for amino acids 49–51) was observed in one of group A strains. Fifteen different SH protein sequences were detected; 68% of strains possessed the consensus sequence and most of others differed from the consensus in only one amino acid (only 4 strains differed in 2 amino acids). The majority of differing amino acids in group A viruses had the same identity as the corresponding amino acids in group B strains. When analysis was restricted to strains with identical HVR2 nucleotide sequences and differing SH protein sequences, 75% of differences observed in the SH ectodomain were located within region coding for amino acids 49–51. CONCLUSIONS: Basing HRSV molecular epidemiology studies solely on HVR2 largely underestimates the complexity of circulating virus populations. In strain identification, broadening of the genomic target sequence to SH gene would provide a more comprehensive insight into viral pool versatility and its evolutionary processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12985-018-1020-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60527052018-07-23 Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena Slovic, Anamarija Ljubin-Sternak, Sunčanica Mlinarić Galinović, Gordana Forcic, Dubravko Virol J Research BACKGROUND: Small hydrophobic (SH) gene is one of the mostly diverse genomic regions of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV). Its coding region constitutes less than 50% of the complete gene length, enabling SH gene to be highly variable and the SH protein highly conserved. In standard HRSV molecular epidemiology studies, solely sequences of the second hypervariable region of the glycoprotein gene (HVR2) are analyzed. To what extent do the strains identical in HVR2 differ elsewhere in genomes is rarely investigated. Our goal was to investigate whether diversity and inter-genotype differences observed for HVR2 are also present in the SH gene. METHODS: We sequenced 198 clinical samples collected within a limited area and time frame. In this HRSV collection, rapid and significant changes in HVR2 occurred. RESULTS: Over 20% of strains from this pool (containing HRSV genotypes NA1, ON1, GA5, BA9 and BA10) would be incorrectly assumed to be identical to another strain if only the HVR2 region was analysed. The majority of differences found in SH gene were located in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR). Seven indels were detected, one was genotype GA5 specific. An in-frame deletion of 9 nucleotides (coding for amino acids 49–51) was observed in one of group A strains. Fifteen different SH protein sequences were detected; 68% of strains possessed the consensus sequence and most of others differed from the consensus in only one amino acid (only 4 strains differed in 2 amino acids). The majority of differing amino acids in group A viruses had the same identity as the corresponding amino acids in group B strains. When analysis was restricted to strains with identical HVR2 nucleotide sequences and differing SH protein sequences, 75% of differences observed in the SH ectodomain were located within region coding for amino acids 49–51. CONCLUSIONS: Basing HRSV molecular epidemiology studies solely on HVR2 largely underestimates the complexity of circulating virus populations. In strain identification, broadening of the genomic target sequence to SH gene would provide a more comprehensive insight into viral pool versatility and its evolutionary processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12985-018-1020-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052705/ /pubmed/30021648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1020-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ivancic-Jelecki, Jelena
Slovic, Anamarija
Ljubin-Sternak, Sunčanica
Mlinarić Galinović, Gordana
Forcic, Dubravko
Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title_full Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title_fullStr Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title_full_unstemmed Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title_short Variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
title_sort variability analysis and inter-genotype comparison of human respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic gene
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1020-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ivancicjeleckijelena variabilityanalysisandintergenotypecomparisonofhumanrespiratorysyncytialvirussmallhydrophobicgene
AT slovicanamarija variabilityanalysisandintergenotypecomparisonofhumanrespiratorysyncytialvirussmallhydrophobicgene
AT ljubinsternaksuncanica variabilityanalysisandintergenotypecomparisonofhumanrespiratorysyncytialvirussmallhydrophobicgene
AT mlinaricgalinovicgordana variabilityanalysisandintergenotypecomparisonofhumanrespiratorysyncytialvirussmallhydrophobicgene
AT forcicdubravko variabilityanalysisandintergenotypecomparisonofhumanrespiratorysyncytialvirussmallhydrophobicgene