Cargando…

Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola

BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa often use abortion as a method of limiting their fertility and spacing births. However, it is not well understood whether having an abortion influences contraceptive behavior. The goal of this study was to examine associations between abortion history and use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Natalie, Prata, Ndola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S164736
_version_ 1783340771220389888
author Morris, Natalie
Prata, Ndola
author_facet Morris, Natalie
Prata, Ndola
author_sort Morris, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa often use abortion as a method of limiting their fertility and spacing births. However, it is not well understood whether having an abortion influences contraceptive behavior. The goal of this study was to examine associations between abortion history and use of a modern contraceptive method among women in Luanda, Angola. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data on 1,176 women aged 15–49 years from a 2012 cross-sectional study conducted in Luanda, Angola, which aimed to obtain general information on sexual and reproductive health indicators. The outcome and exposure were based on participant reports of past induced abortions and current use of a modern method. We used a modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate the relative risks of using a modern contraceptive method, given history of induced abortion. RESULTS: Among all respondents, 736 (62.6%) reported using a modern contraceptive method. The clear majority of the respondents (73.21%), regardless of abortion history, were using either no method, a traditional method, or condoms. Long-acting reversible contraceptive use was very low across all respondents (2.73%). The most common family planning method reported by women with a history of abortion was condoms (32.76%). Regression analysis demonstrated that women who had a history of abortion were 1.23 times more likely to use a modern contraceptive method as compared to those who never had an abortion (relative risk: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.10–1.36), after adjusting for potential confounders. Postregression estimations of predicted probabilities demonstrated that women with a history of abortion had an 80% probability of using a modern method (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), while those who never had an abortion had a 60% probability of using a modern method (95% CI: 0.59–0.61). CONCLUSION: History of induced abortion was associated with use of a modern contraceptive method in our study population. The most common contraceptive used by women with a history of induced abortion was condoms, indicating that despite adoption of a modern method, many women are still at risk for an unintended pregnancy. Further research is needed to understand the causal factors underlying women’s postabortion contraceptive choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6053171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60531712018-07-23 Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola Morris, Natalie Prata, Ndola Open Access J Contracept Original Research BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa often use abortion as a method of limiting their fertility and spacing births. However, it is not well understood whether having an abortion influences contraceptive behavior. The goal of this study was to examine associations between abortion history and use of a modern contraceptive method among women in Luanda, Angola. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data on 1,176 women aged 15–49 years from a 2012 cross-sectional study conducted in Luanda, Angola, which aimed to obtain general information on sexual and reproductive health indicators. The outcome and exposure were based on participant reports of past induced abortions and current use of a modern method. We used a modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate the relative risks of using a modern contraceptive method, given history of induced abortion. RESULTS: Among all respondents, 736 (62.6%) reported using a modern contraceptive method. The clear majority of the respondents (73.21%), regardless of abortion history, were using either no method, a traditional method, or condoms. Long-acting reversible contraceptive use was very low across all respondents (2.73%). The most common family planning method reported by women with a history of abortion was condoms (32.76%). Regression analysis demonstrated that women who had a history of abortion were 1.23 times more likely to use a modern contraceptive method as compared to those who never had an abortion (relative risk: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.10–1.36), after adjusting for potential confounders. Postregression estimations of predicted probabilities demonstrated that women with a history of abortion had an 80% probability of using a modern method (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), while those who never had an abortion had a 60% probability of using a modern method (95% CI: 0.59–0.61). CONCLUSION: History of induced abortion was associated with use of a modern contraceptive method in our study population. The most common contraceptive used by women with a history of induced abortion was condoms, indicating that despite adoption of a modern method, many women are still at risk for an unintended pregnancy. Further research is needed to understand the causal factors underlying women’s postabortion contraceptive choices. Dove Medical Press 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6053171/ /pubmed/30038527 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S164736 Text en © 2018 Morris and Prata. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Morris, Natalie
Prata, Ndola
Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title_full Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title_fullStr Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title_full_unstemmed Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title_short Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola
title_sort abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in luanda, angola
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S164736
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisnatalie abortionhistoryanditsassociationwithcurrentuseofmoderncontraceptivemethodsinluandaangola
AT pratandola abortionhistoryanditsassociationwithcurrentuseofmoderncontraceptivemethodsinluandaangola