Cargando…

Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols

PURPOSE: To evaluate transient severe respiratory motion artifacts (TSM) at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI dependent on the mode of contrast agent application. METHODS: 200 patients (71f, 129m; mean 51y) were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Contrast application protocols (n = 4)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ringe, Kristina I., von Falck, Christian, Raatschen, Hans-Jürgen, Wacker, Frank, Hinrichs, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200887
_version_ 1783340781234290688
author Ringe, Kristina I.
von Falck, Christian
Raatschen, Hans-Jürgen
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan
author_facet Ringe, Kristina I.
von Falck, Christian
Raatschen, Hans-Jürgen
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan
author_sort Ringe, Kristina I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate transient severe respiratory motion artifacts (TSM) at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI dependent on the mode of contrast agent application. METHODS: 200 patients (71f, 129m; mean 51y) were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Contrast application protocols (n = 4) differed with regards to injection rate (2ml or 1ml/sec), dose (weight-based or fixed 10ml) and supplemental oxygen administration (yes/no). SNR measurements were performed in the aorta and portal vein. Qualitatively, three readers assessed arterial phase image quality and TSM independently (4- and 5-point scale, respectively). Quantitative and qualitative results were compared (Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparison test). The influence of different contrast agent application parameters on the occurrence of respiratory motion artifacts was assessed (univariate analysis). Interrater agreement and reliability were calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)). RESULTS: Use of a lower contrast injection rate resulted in significantly higher arterial SNR in the aorta and portal vein (p<0.05). TSM was observed in 12% of examinations. Neither injection rate, contrast dose, nor oxygen had a significant influence. Interrater agreement and reliability for evaluation of image quality and respiratory motion were substantial/ almost perfect (ICC = 0.640–0.915). CONCLUSIONS: Technical factors regarding the specific mode of contrast application do not seem to significantly reduce the incidence of severe transient respiratory motion artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6053213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60532132018-07-27 Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols Ringe, Kristina I. von Falck, Christian Raatschen, Hans-Jürgen Wacker, Frank Hinrichs, Jan PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate transient severe respiratory motion artifacts (TSM) at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI dependent on the mode of contrast agent application. METHODS: 200 patients (71f, 129m; mean 51y) were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Contrast application protocols (n = 4) differed with regards to injection rate (2ml or 1ml/sec), dose (weight-based or fixed 10ml) and supplemental oxygen administration (yes/no). SNR measurements were performed in the aorta and portal vein. Qualitatively, three readers assessed arterial phase image quality and TSM independently (4- and 5-point scale, respectively). Quantitative and qualitative results were compared (Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s multiple comparison test). The influence of different contrast agent application parameters on the occurrence of respiratory motion artifacts was assessed (univariate analysis). Interrater agreement and reliability were calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)). RESULTS: Use of a lower contrast injection rate resulted in significantly higher arterial SNR in the aorta and portal vein (p<0.05). TSM was observed in 12% of examinations. Neither injection rate, contrast dose, nor oxygen had a significant influence. Interrater agreement and reliability for evaluation of image quality and respiratory motion were substantial/ almost perfect (ICC = 0.640–0.915). CONCLUSIONS: Technical factors regarding the specific mode of contrast application do not seem to significantly reduce the incidence of severe transient respiratory motion artifacts. Public Library of Science 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6053213/ /pubmed/30024930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200887 Text en © 2018 Ringe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ringe, Kristina I.
von Falck, Christian
Raatschen, Hans-Jürgen
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan
Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title_full Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title_fullStr Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title_short Evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—Influence of different contrast agent application protocols
title_sort evaluation of transient respiratory motion artifact at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced mri—influence of different contrast agent application protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200887
work_keys_str_mv AT ringekristinai evaluationoftransientrespiratorymotionartifactatgadoxetatedisodiumenhancedmriinfluenceofdifferentcontrastagentapplicationprotocols
AT vonfalckchristian evaluationoftransientrespiratorymotionartifactatgadoxetatedisodiumenhancedmriinfluenceofdifferentcontrastagentapplicationprotocols
AT raatschenhansjurgen evaluationoftransientrespiratorymotionartifactatgadoxetatedisodiumenhancedmriinfluenceofdifferentcontrastagentapplicationprotocols
AT wackerfrank evaluationoftransientrespiratorymotionartifactatgadoxetatedisodiumenhancedmriinfluenceofdifferentcontrastagentapplicationprotocols
AT hinrichsjan evaluationoftransientrespiratorymotionartifactatgadoxetatedisodiumenhancedmriinfluenceofdifferentcontrastagentapplicationprotocols