Cargando…
Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment
BACKGROUND: Dietary questionnaires currently available which can assess the habitual diet are timely, costly, or not adapted well to the modern diet; thus, there is a need for a shorter food frequency e-Questionnaire (FFeQ) adapted to Western diets, in order to properly estimate energy and macronutr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9113 |
_version_ | 1783340860096643072 |
---|---|
author | Affret, Aurélie El Fatouhi, Douae Dow, Courtney Correia, Emmanuelle Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine Fagherazzi, Guy |
author_facet | Affret, Aurélie El Fatouhi, Douae Dow, Courtney Correia, Emmanuelle Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine Fagherazzi, Guy |
author_sort | Affret, Aurélie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dietary questionnaires currently available which can assess the habitual diet are timely, costly, or not adapted well to the modern diet; thus, there is a need for a shorter food frequency e-Questionnaire (FFeQ) adapted to Western diets, in order to properly estimate energy and macronutrient intakes or rank individuals according to food and nutrient intakes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity and reproducibility of a 30-minute and 44-item FFeQ in a sample of adults obtained from the general population. METHODS: A sample of French adults was recruited through social media and an advertising campaign. A total of 223 volunteers completed the FFeQ twice at one-year intervals and were included in the reproducibility study. During that interval, 92 participants completed three-to-six 24-hour recalls and were included in the validity study. Nutrient and dietary intakes were computed for all validity and reproducibility participants. The level of agreement between the two methods was evaluated for nutrient and food group intakes using classification into quintiles of daily intake, correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: For relative validity, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.09 to 0.88 (unadjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.48) and 0.02 to 0.68 (deattenuated and energy adjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.50) for food group and nutrient intakes, respectively. The median proportion of subjects classified into the same or adjacent quintile was 73% and 66% for food and nutrient intakes, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement across the range of intakes. Regarding reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.72 (median: 0.60) and 0.55 to 0.73 (median: 0.64), for food and nutrient intakes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FFeQ showed acceptable validity and reproducibility in a sample of adults based on their food and nutrient intakes. The FFeQ is a promising and low-cost tool that can be used in large-scale online epidemiological studies or clinical routines and could be integrated into evidence-based smartphone apps for assessing diet components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6053608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60536082018-07-27 Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment Affret, Aurélie El Fatouhi, Douae Dow, Courtney Correia, Emmanuelle Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine Fagherazzi, Guy J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Dietary questionnaires currently available which can assess the habitual diet are timely, costly, or not adapted well to the modern diet; thus, there is a need for a shorter food frequency e-Questionnaire (FFeQ) adapted to Western diets, in order to properly estimate energy and macronutrient intakes or rank individuals according to food and nutrient intakes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity and reproducibility of a 30-minute and 44-item FFeQ in a sample of adults obtained from the general population. METHODS: A sample of French adults was recruited through social media and an advertising campaign. A total of 223 volunteers completed the FFeQ twice at one-year intervals and were included in the reproducibility study. During that interval, 92 participants completed three-to-six 24-hour recalls and were included in the validity study. Nutrient and dietary intakes were computed for all validity and reproducibility participants. The level of agreement between the two methods was evaluated for nutrient and food group intakes using classification into quintiles of daily intake, correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: For relative validity, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.09 to 0.88 (unadjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.48) and 0.02 to 0.68 (deattenuated and energy adjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.50) for food group and nutrient intakes, respectively. The median proportion of subjects classified into the same or adjacent quintile was 73% and 66% for food and nutrient intakes, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement across the range of intakes. Regarding reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.72 (median: 0.60) and 0.55 to 0.73 (median: 0.64), for food and nutrient intakes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FFeQ showed acceptable validity and reproducibility in a sample of adults based on their food and nutrient intakes. The FFeQ is a promising and low-cost tool that can be used in large-scale online epidemiological studies or clinical routines and could be integrated into evidence-based smartphone apps for assessing diet components. JMIR Publications 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6053608/ /pubmed/29980502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9113 Text en ©Aurélie Affret, Douae El Fatouhi, Courtney Dow, Emmanuelle Correia, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Guy Fagherazzi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.07.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Affret, Aurélie El Fatouhi, Douae Dow, Courtney Correia, Emmanuelle Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine Fagherazzi, Guy Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title | Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title_full | Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title_fullStr | Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title_short | Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment |
title_sort | relative validity and reproducibility of a new 44-item diet and food frequency questionnaire among adults: online assessment |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT affretaurelie relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment AT elfatouhidouae relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment AT dowcourtney relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment AT correiaemmanuelle relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment AT boutronruaultmariechristine relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment AT fagherazziguy relativevalidityandreproducibilityofanew44itemdietandfoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongadultsonlineassessment |