Cargando…

Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND: An analysis of the scope of practice of recent Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) graduates working as general otolaryngologists has not been previously performed. As Canadian OHNS residency programs implement competency-based training strategies, this data may be used to alig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskander, Antoine, Campisi, Paolo, Witterick, Ian J., Pothier, David D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0293-8
_version_ 1783340901357060096
author Eskander, Antoine
Campisi, Paolo
Witterick, Ian J.
Pothier, David D.
author_facet Eskander, Antoine
Campisi, Paolo
Witterick, Ian J.
Pothier, David D.
author_sort Eskander, Antoine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An analysis of the scope of practice of recent Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) graduates working as general otolaryngologists has not been previously performed. As Canadian OHNS residency programs implement competency-based training strategies, this data may be used to align residency curricula with the clinical and surgical practice of recent graduates. METHODS: Ontario billing data were used to identify the most common diagnostic and procedure codes used by general otolaryngologists issued a billing number between 2006 and 2012. The codes were categorized by OHNS subspecialty. Practitioners with a narrow range of procedure codes or a high rate of complex procedure codes, were deemed subspecialists and therefore excluded. RESULTS: There were 108 recent graduates in a general practice identified. The most common diagnostic codes assigned to consultation billings were categorized as ‘otology’ (42%), ‘general otolaryngology’ (35%), ‘rhinology’ (17%) and ‘head and neck’ (4%). The most common procedure codes were categorized as ‘general otolaryngology’ (45%), ‘otology’ (23%), ‘head and neck’ (13%) and ‘rhinology’ (9%). The top 5 procedures were nasolaryngoscopy, ear microdebridement, myringotomy with insertion of ventilation tube, tonsillectomy, and turbinate reduction. Although otology encompassed a large proportion of procedures billed, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy were surprisingly uncommon. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to analyze the nature of the clinical and surgical cases managed by recent OHNS graduates. The findings demonstrated a prominent representation of ‘otology’, ‘general’ and ‘rhinology’ based consultation diagnoses and procedures. The data derived from the study needs to be considered as residency curricula are modified to satisfy competency-based requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6053828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60538282018-07-23 Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada Eskander, Antoine Campisi, Paolo Witterick, Ian J. Pothier, David D. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: An analysis of the scope of practice of recent Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) graduates working as general otolaryngologists has not been previously performed. As Canadian OHNS residency programs implement competency-based training strategies, this data may be used to align residency curricula with the clinical and surgical practice of recent graduates. METHODS: Ontario billing data were used to identify the most common diagnostic and procedure codes used by general otolaryngologists issued a billing number between 2006 and 2012. The codes were categorized by OHNS subspecialty. Practitioners with a narrow range of procedure codes or a high rate of complex procedure codes, were deemed subspecialists and therefore excluded. RESULTS: There were 108 recent graduates in a general practice identified. The most common diagnostic codes assigned to consultation billings were categorized as ‘otology’ (42%), ‘general otolaryngology’ (35%), ‘rhinology’ (17%) and ‘head and neck’ (4%). The most common procedure codes were categorized as ‘general otolaryngology’ (45%), ‘otology’ (23%), ‘head and neck’ (13%) and ‘rhinology’ (9%). The top 5 procedures were nasolaryngoscopy, ear microdebridement, myringotomy with insertion of ventilation tube, tonsillectomy, and turbinate reduction. Although otology encompassed a large proportion of procedures billed, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy were surprisingly uncommon. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to analyze the nature of the clinical and surgical cases managed by recent OHNS graduates. The findings demonstrated a prominent representation of ‘otology’, ‘general’ and ‘rhinology’ based consultation diagnoses and procedures. The data derived from the study needs to be considered as residency curricula are modified to satisfy competency-based requirements. BioMed Central 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6053828/ /pubmed/30029682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0293-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Eskander, Antoine
Campisi, Paolo
Witterick, Ian J.
Pothier, David D.
Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title_full Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title_short Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada
title_sort consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in ontario, canada
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0293-8
work_keys_str_mv AT eskanderantoine consultationdiagnosesandproceduresbilledamongrecentgraduatespracticinggeneralotolaryngologyheadnecksurgeryinontariocanada
AT campisipaolo consultationdiagnosesandproceduresbilledamongrecentgraduatespracticinggeneralotolaryngologyheadnecksurgeryinontariocanada
AT witterickianj consultationdiagnosesandproceduresbilledamongrecentgraduatespracticinggeneralotolaryngologyheadnecksurgeryinontariocanada
AT pothierdavidd consultationdiagnosesandproceduresbilledamongrecentgraduatespracticinggeneralotolaryngologyheadnecksurgeryinontariocanada