A quantitative definition of hypervalency

From the inception of Lewis' theory of chemical bonding, hypervalency has remained a point of difficulty that has not been fully resolved by the currently accepted qualitative definition of this term. Therefore, in this work, a quantitative measure of hypervalency has been developed. The only required input is the atomic charge map, which can be obtained from either quantum calculations or from experiment. Using this definition, it is found that well-known species such as O(3), CH(2)N(2) and ClO(4)(–), are indeed hypervalent, whilst others such as XeF(4), PCl(5) and SO(4)(2–), are not. Quantitative analysis of known species of general formulae XF(n)(m–), XCl(n)(m–), and XO(n)(m–) shows that there are no fundamental differences in chemical bonding for hypervalent and non-hypervalent species. Nevertheless, hypervalency is associated with chemical instability, as well as a high degree of covalent rather than ionic bonding. The implications for accepted Lewis structure conventions are discussed.