Cargando…
Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics
Reproducibility has been shown to be limited in many scientific fields. This question is a fundamental tenet of scientific activity, but the related issues of reusability of scientific data are poorly documented. Here, we present a case study of our difficulties in reproducing a published bioinforma...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy077 |
_version_ | 1783340976656351232 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Yang-Min Poline, Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Guillaume |
author_facet | Kim, Yang-Min Poline, Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Guillaume |
author_sort | Kim, Yang-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reproducibility has been shown to be limited in many scientific fields. This question is a fundamental tenet of scientific activity, but the related issues of reusability of scientific data are poorly documented. Here, we present a case study of our difficulties in reproducing a published bioinformatics method even though code and data were available. First, we tried to re-run the analysis with the code and data provided by the authors. Second, we reimplemented the whole method in a Python package to avoid dependency on a MATLAB license and ease the execution of the code on a high-performance computing cluster. Third, we assessed reusability of our reimplementation and the quality of our documentation, testing how easy it would be to start from our implementation to reproduce the results. In a second section, we propose solutions from this case study and other observations to improve reproducibility and research efficiency at the individual and collective levels. While finalizing our code, we created case-specific documentation and tutorials for the associated Python package StratiPy. Readers are invited to experiment with our reproducibility case study by generating the two confusion matrices (see more in section “Robustness: from MATLAB to Python, language and organization"). Here, we propose two options: a step-by-step process to follow in a Jupyter/IPython notebook or a Docker container ready to be built and run. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60542422018-07-25 Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics Kim, Yang-Min Poline, Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Guillaume Gigascience Review Reproducibility has been shown to be limited in many scientific fields. This question is a fundamental tenet of scientific activity, but the related issues of reusability of scientific data are poorly documented. Here, we present a case study of our difficulties in reproducing a published bioinformatics method even though code and data were available. First, we tried to re-run the analysis with the code and data provided by the authors. Second, we reimplemented the whole method in a Python package to avoid dependency on a MATLAB license and ease the execution of the code on a high-performance computing cluster. Third, we assessed reusability of our reimplementation and the quality of our documentation, testing how easy it would be to start from our implementation to reproduce the results. In a second section, we propose solutions from this case study and other observations to improve reproducibility and research efficiency at the individual and collective levels. While finalizing our code, we created case-specific documentation and tutorials for the associated Python package StratiPy. Readers are invited to experiment with our reproducibility case study by generating the two confusion matrices (see more in section “Robustness: from MATLAB to Python, language and organization"). Here, we propose two options: a step-by-step process to follow in a Jupyter/IPython notebook or a Docker container ready to be built and run. Oxford University Press 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6054242/ /pubmed/29961842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy077 Text en © The Authors 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kim, Yang-Min Poline, Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Guillaume Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title | Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title_full | Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title_fullStr | Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title_short | Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
title_sort | experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimyangmin experimentingwithreproducibilityacasestudyofrobustnessinbioinformatics AT polinejeanbaptiste experimentingwithreproducibilityacasestudyofrobustnessinbioinformatics AT dumasguillaume experimentingwithreproducibilityacasestudyofrobustnessinbioinformatics |