Cargando…
A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method
In inhomogeneous media, there is often a large systematic difference in the dose between the conventional Clarkson algorithm (C-Clarkson) for independent calculation verification and the superposition-based algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPSs). These treatment site–dependent differences i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry039 |
_version_ | 1783340977131356160 |
---|---|
author | Jinno, Shunta Tachibana, Hidenobu Moriya, Shunsuke Mizuno, Norifumi Takahashi, Ryo Kamima, Tatsuya Ishibashi, Satoru Sato, Masanori |
author_facet | Jinno, Shunta Tachibana, Hidenobu Moriya, Shunsuke Mizuno, Norifumi Takahashi, Ryo Kamima, Tatsuya Ishibashi, Satoru Sato, Masanori |
author_sort | Jinno, Shunta |
collection | PubMed |
description | In inhomogeneous media, there is often a large systematic difference in the dose between the conventional Clarkson algorithm (C-Clarkson) for independent calculation verification and the superposition-based algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPSs). These treatment site–dependent differences increase the complexity of the radiotherapy planning secondary check. We developed a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm (L-Clarkson) to account for the effects of heterogeneity in the lateral dimension, and performed a multi-institutional study to evaluate the effectiveness of the method. In the method, a 2D image reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images is divided according to lines extending from the reference point to the edge of the multileaf collimator (MLC) or jaw collimator for each pie sector, and the radiological path length (RPL) of each line is calculated on the 2D image to obtain a tissue maximum ratio and phantom scatter factor, allowing the dose to be calculated. A total of 261 plans (1237 beams) for conventional breast and lung treatments and lung stereotactic body radiotherapy were collected from four institutions. Disagreements in dose between the on-site TPSs and a verification program using the C-Clarkson and L-Clarkson algorithms were compared. Systematic differences with the L-Clarkson method were within 1% for all sites, while the C-Clarkson method resulted in systematic differences of 1–5%. The L-Clarkson method showed smaller variations. This heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm would provide a simple evaluation within the range of −5% to +5% for a radiotherapy plan secondary check. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60542442018-07-25 A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method Jinno, Shunta Tachibana, Hidenobu Moriya, Shunsuke Mizuno, Norifumi Takahashi, Ryo Kamima, Tatsuya Ishibashi, Satoru Sato, Masanori J Radiat Res Regular Paper In inhomogeneous media, there is often a large systematic difference in the dose between the conventional Clarkson algorithm (C-Clarkson) for independent calculation verification and the superposition-based algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPSs). These treatment site–dependent differences increase the complexity of the radiotherapy planning secondary check. We developed a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm (L-Clarkson) to account for the effects of heterogeneity in the lateral dimension, and performed a multi-institutional study to evaluate the effectiveness of the method. In the method, a 2D image reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images is divided according to lines extending from the reference point to the edge of the multileaf collimator (MLC) or jaw collimator for each pie sector, and the radiological path length (RPL) of each line is calculated on the 2D image to obtain a tissue maximum ratio and phantom scatter factor, allowing the dose to be calculated. A total of 261 plans (1237 beams) for conventional breast and lung treatments and lung stereotactic body radiotherapy were collected from four institutions. Disagreements in dose between the on-site TPSs and a verification program using the C-Clarkson and L-Clarkson algorithms were compared. Systematic differences with the L-Clarkson method were within 1% for all sites, while the C-Clarkson method resulted in systematic differences of 1–5%. The L-Clarkson method showed smaller variations. This heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm would provide a simple evaluation within the range of −5% to +5% for a radiotherapy plan secondary check. Oxford University Press 2018-07 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6054244/ /pubmed/29790997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry039 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Paper Jinno, Shunta Tachibana, Hidenobu Moriya, Shunsuke Mizuno, Norifumi Takahashi, Ryo Kamima, Tatsuya Ishibashi, Satoru Sato, Masanori A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title | A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title_full | A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title_fullStr | A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title_short | A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method |
title_sort | multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the clarkson method |
topic | Regular Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinnoshunta amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT tachibanahidenobu amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT moriyashunsuke amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT mizunonorifumi amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT takahashiryo amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT kamimatatsuya amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT ishibashisatoru amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT satomasanori amultiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT jinnoshunta multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT tachibanahidenobu multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT moriyashunsuke multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT mizunonorifumi multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT takahashiryo multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT kamimatatsuya multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT ishibashisatoru multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod AT satomasanori multiinstitutionalstudyofindependentcalculationverificationininhomogeneousmediausingasimpleandeffectivemethodofheterogeneitycorrectionintegratedwiththeclarksonmethod |