Cargando…

Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial

INTRODUCTION: Epidural anesthesia is frequently used to provide postoperative analgesia following major surgical procedures. Secure fixation of the epidural catheter is necessary to prevent premature dislodgment and loss of epidural analgesia. Using an in vitro model, the current prospective study e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hakim, Mohammed, Froyshteter, Alexander B, Walia, Hina, Tumin, Dmitry, Veneziano, Giorgio, Bhalla, Tarun, Tobias, Joseph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046251
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S172799
_version_ 1783340983756259328
author Hakim, Mohammed
Froyshteter, Alexander B
Walia, Hina
Tumin, Dmitry
Veneziano, Giorgio
Bhalla, Tarun
Tobias, Joseph D
author_facet Hakim, Mohammed
Froyshteter, Alexander B
Walia, Hina
Tumin, Dmitry
Veneziano, Giorgio
Bhalla, Tarun
Tobias, Joseph D
author_sort Hakim, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Epidural anesthesia is frequently used to provide postoperative analgesia following major surgical procedures. Secure fixation of the epidural catheter is necessary to prevent premature dislodgment and loss of epidural analgesia. Using an in vitro model, the current prospective study evaluates different types of dressings for securement of an epidural catheter by quantifying the force in Newtons (N) required for dislodgment using a digital force gage. METHODS: Four methods of epidural catheter securement were used on a simulator mannequin: 1) Suresite(®) Window Clear Dressing, 2) Op-Site Post-Op(®) Visible Dressing, 3) Steri-Strips(®) and Suresite Window Clear Dressing, and 4) Steri-Strips and Op-Site Post-Op Visible Dressing. Each method of securement was assessed 10 times to calculate the mean force required to dislodge the catheter. Mean force of dislodgment for each method was compared using parametric tests. RESULTS: The force (mean ± SD) required for catheter dislodgment for the four methods was 14.0±2.9, 2, 10.7±1.5, 8.6±2.3, and 9.6±2.2 N, respectively. The pairwise difference showed that the Suresite Window Clear Dressing was the best securement method when compared with other methods. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the advantage of the Suresite Window Clear Dressing in securing the epidural catheter. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6054289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60542892018-07-25 Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial Hakim, Mohammed Froyshteter, Alexander B Walia, Hina Tumin, Dmitry Veneziano, Giorgio Bhalla, Tarun Tobias, Joseph D Local Reg Anesth Original Research INTRODUCTION: Epidural anesthesia is frequently used to provide postoperative analgesia following major surgical procedures. Secure fixation of the epidural catheter is necessary to prevent premature dislodgment and loss of epidural analgesia. Using an in vitro model, the current prospective study evaluates different types of dressings for securement of an epidural catheter by quantifying the force in Newtons (N) required for dislodgment using a digital force gage. METHODS: Four methods of epidural catheter securement were used on a simulator mannequin: 1) Suresite(®) Window Clear Dressing, 2) Op-Site Post-Op(®) Visible Dressing, 3) Steri-Strips(®) and Suresite Window Clear Dressing, and 4) Steri-Strips and Op-Site Post-Op Visible Dressing. Each method of securement was assessed 10 times to calculate the mean force required to dislodge the catheter. Mean force of dislodgment for each method was compared using parametric tests. RESULTS: The force (mean ± SD) required for catheter dislodgment for the four methods was 14.0±2.9, 2, 10.7±1.5, 8.6±2.3, and 9.6±2.2 N, respectively. The pairwise difference showed that the Suresite Window Clear Dressing was the best securement method when compared with other methods. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the advantage of the Suresite Window Clear Dressing in securing the epidural catheter. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these findings. Dove Medical Press 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6054289/ /pubmed/30046251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S172799 Text en © 2018 Hakim et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hakim, Mohammed
Froyshteter, Alexander B
Walia, Hina
Tumin, Dmitry
Veneziano, Giorgio
Bhalla, Tarun
Tobias, Joseph D
Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title_full Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title_fullStr Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title_short Optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
title_sort optimizing the securement of epidural catheters: an in vitro trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046251
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S172799
work_keys_str_mv AT hakimmohammed optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT froyshteteralexanderb optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT waliahina optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT tumindmitry optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT venezianogiorgio optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT bhallatarun optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial
AT tobiasjosephd optimizingthesecurementofepiduralcathetersaninvitrotrial