Cargando…
Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia
INTRODUCTION: Translation of research findings into clinical practice has potential to improve health care procedures, increase patient safety, and improve patient outcomes. However, low levels of evidence utilization in clinical practice have been widely reported. Anecdotal evidence suggests that t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046264 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S150604 |
_version_ | 1783340986391330816 |
---|---|
author | Samarkandi, Osama A Bashatah, Adel S Khan, Anas A Almobrad, Abdulmajeed M Beovich, Bronwyn Williams, Brett |
author_facet | Samarkandi, Osama A Bashatah, Adel S Khan, Anas A Almobrad, Abdulmajeed M Beovich, Bronwyn Williams, Brett |
author_sort | Samarkandi, Osama A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Translation of research findings into clinical practice has potential to improve health care procedures, increase patient safety, and improve patient outcomes. However, low levels of evidence utilization in clinical practice have been widely reported. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this is also the case for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to examine the barriers to the utilization of research findings within this cohort. METHODS: The BARRIERS scale was used to gather data from a convenience sample of EMTs in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: The barriers most commonly rated as “great” or “moderate” were “Implications for practice are not made clear”, “The relevant literature is not compiled in one place”, and “The EMT feels the benefits of changing practice will be minimal”. However, when responses were examined at a subscale level, reliability, as measured by Cronbach’s α, was suboptimal (range 0.20–0.62). DISCUSSION: No similar study has been conducted within paramedicine to enable direct comparison of our results; however, the top barriers identified in the present study are also highly rated in some previous studies of nurse cohorts. The low reliability measures of the subscales may demonstrate the importance of context specificity when utilizing this scale and that further research is required to develop a reliable and valid tool for use within this cohort. CONCLUSION: The top 2 barriers identified indicate that there may be a need for improvement regarding communication of research evidence to Saudi EMTs. For future studies, translation of the BARRIERS scale may be useful. However, as these EMT courses are taught in English, careful consideration of cultural suitability and more subtle interpretation issues could also be appropriate. Once context-specific barriers are identified and examined, they may inform the development of effective strategies to increase the uptake of research evidence into Saudi EMT practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60543222018-07-25 Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia Samarkandi, Osama A Bashatah, Adel S Khan, Anas A Almobrad, Abdulmajeed M Beovich, Bronwyn Williams, Brett Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research INTRODUCTION: Translation of research findings into clinical practice has potential to improve health care procedures, increase patient safety, and improve patient outcomes. However, low levels of evidence utilization in clinical practice have been widely reported. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this is also the case for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to examine the barriers to the utilization of research findings within this cohort. METHODS: The BARRIERS scale was used to gather data from a convenience sample of EMTs in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: The barriers most commonly rated as “great” or “moderate” were “Implications for practice are not made clear”, “The relevant literature is not compiled in one place”, and “The EMT feels the benefits of changing practice will be minimal”. However, when responses were examined at a subscale level, reliability, as measured by Cronbach’s α, was suboptimal (range 0.20–0.62). DISCUSSION: No similar study has been conducted within paramedicine to enable direct comparison of our results; however, the top barriers identified in the present study are also highly rated in some previous studies of nurse cohorts. The low reliability measures of the subscales may demonstrate the importance of context specificity when utilizing this scale and that further research is required to develop a reliable and valid tool for use within this cohort. CONCLUSION: The top 2 barriers identified indicate that there may be a need for improvement regarding communication of research evidence to Saudi EMTs. For future studies, translation of the BARRIERS scale may be useful. However, as these EMT courses are taught in English, careful consideration of cultural suitability and more subtle interpretation issues could also be appropriate. Once context-specific barriers are identified and examined, they may inform the development of effective strategies to increase the uptake of research evidence into Saudi EMT practice. Dove Medical Press 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6054322/ /pubmed/30046264 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S150604 Text en © 2018 Samarkandi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Samarkandi, Osama A Bashatah, Adel S Khan, Anas A Almobrad, Abdulmajeed M Beovich, Bronwyn Williams, Brett Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title | Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title_full | Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title_fullStr | Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title_full_unstemmed | Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title_short | Research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in Saudi Arabia |
title_sort | research utilization barriers for emergency medical technicians in saudi arabia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046264 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S150604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samarkandiosamaa researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia AT bashatahadels researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia AT khananasa researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia AT almobradabdulmajeedm researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia AT beovichbronwyn researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia AT williamsbrett researchutilizationbarriersforemergencymedicaltechniciansinsaudiarabia |