Cargando…
Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healt...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z |
_version_ | 1783341042646384640 |
---|---|
author | Michel, Carine Bonnetain, Lucie Amoura, Sarah White, Olivier |
author_facet | Michel, Carine Bonnetain, Lucie Amoura, Sarah White, Olivier |
author_sort | Michel, Carine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healthy individuals whether expansion to spatial cognition is restricted to adaptive processes peculiar to prism adaptation or whether it occurs as well following other forms of adaptive process such as adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during pointing movements. Representational after-effects were assessed by the perceptual line bisection task before and after adaptation to a leftward or a rightward force field. The main results showed that adaptation developed at sensorimotor level but did not influence space representation. Our results have therefore a strong methodological impact for prospective investigations focusing on sensorimotor plasticity while sparing space cognition. These methodological considerations will be particulary relevant when addressing sensorimotor plasticity in patients with specific representational feature to preserve. The discussion highlights the differences between prism and dynamic adaptation that could explain the lack of after-effect on space representation following force field adaptation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60546882018-07-23 Force field adaptation does not alter space representation Michel, Carine Bonnetain, Lucie Amoura, Sarah White, Olivier Sci Rep Article Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healthy individuals whether expansion to spatial cognition is restricted to adaptive processes peculiar to prism adaptation or whether it occurs as well following other forms of adaptive process such as adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during pointing movements. Representational after-effects were assessed by the perceptual line bisection task before and after adaptation to a leftward or a rightward force field. The main results showed that adaptation developed at sensorimotor level but did not influence space representation. Our results have therefore a strong methodological impact for prospective investigations focusing on sensorimotor plasticity while sparing space cognition. These methodological considerations will be particulary relevant when addressing sensorimotor plasticity in patients with specific representational feature to preserve. The discussion highlights the differences between prism and dynamic adaptation that could explain the lack of after-effect on space representation following force field adaptation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6054688/ /pubmed/30030482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Michel, Carine Bonnetain, Lucie Amoura, Sarah White, Olivier Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title | Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title_full | Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title_fullStr | Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title_full_unstemmed | Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title_short | Force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
title_sort | force field adaptation does not alter space representation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michelcarine forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation AT bonnetainlucie forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation AT amourasarah forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation AT whiteolivier forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation |