Cargando…

Force field adaptation does not alter space representation

Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michel, Carine, Bonnetain, Lucie, Amoura, Sarah, White, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z
_version_ 1783341042646384640
author Michel, Carine
Bonnetain, Lucie
Amoura, Sarah
White, Olivier
author_facet Michel, Carine
Bonnetain, Lucie
Amoura, Sarah
White, Olivier
author_sort Michel, Carine
collection PubMed
description Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healthy individuals whether expansion to spatial cognition is restricted to adaptive processes peculiar to prism adaptation or whether it occurs as well following other forms of adaptive process such as adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during pointing movements. Representational after-effects were assessed by the perceptual line bisection task before and after adaptation to a leftward or a rightward force field. The main results showed that adaptation developed at sensorimotor level but did not influence space representation. Our results have therefore a strong methodological impact for prospective investigations focusing on sensorimotor plasticity while sparing space cognition. These methodological considerations will be particulary relevant when addressing sensorimotor plasticity in patients with specific representational feature to preserve. The discussion highlights the differences between prism and dynamic adaptation that could explain the lack of after-effect on space representation following force field adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6054688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60546882018-07-23 Force field adaptation does not alter space representation Michel, Carine Bonnetain, Lucie Amoura, Sarah White, Olivier Sci Rep Article Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healthy individuals whether expansion to spatial cognition is restricted to adaptive processes peculiar to prism adaptation or whether it occurs as well following other forms of adaptive process such as adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during pointing movements. Representational after-effects were assessed by the perceptual line bisection task before and after adaptation to a leftward or a rightward force field. The main results showed that adaptation developed at sensorimotor level but did not influence space representation. Our results have therefore a strong methodological impact for prospective investigations focusing on sensorimotor plasticity while sparing space cognition. These methodological considerations will be particulary relevant when addressing sensorimotor plasticity in patients with specific representational feature to preserve. The discussion highlights the differences between prism and dynamic adaptation that could explain the lack of after-effect on space representation following force field adaptation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6054688/ /pubmed/30030482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Michel, Carine
Bonnetain, Lucie
Amoura, Sarah
White, Olivier
Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title_full Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title_fullStr Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title_full_unstemmed Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title_short Force field adaptation does not alter space representation
title_sort force field adaptation does not alter space representation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z
work_keys_str_mv AT michelcarine forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation
AT bonnetainlucie forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation
AT amourasarah forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation
AT whiteolivier forcefieldadaptationdoesnotalterspacerepresentation