Cargando…
The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Ling...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4 |
_version_ | 1783341054568693760 |
---|---|
author | Mazza, Danielle Lin, Xiaoping Walter, Fiona M. Young, Jane M. Barnes, David J. Mitchell, Paul Brijnath, Bianca Martin, Andrew Emery, Jon D. |
author_facet | Mazza, Danielle Lin, Xiaoping Walter, Fiona M. Young, Jane M. Barnes, David J. Mitchell, Paul Brijnath, Bianca Martin, Andrew Emery, Jon D. |
author_sort | Mazza, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) are a vulnerable group for lung cancer with higher mortality rates than Caucasian patients. The aim of this study is to explore differences in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients and factors underlying these differences. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational cohort study using a mixed-method approach. Quantitative data regarding time intervals in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways will be gathered via patient surveys, General practitioner (GP) review of general practice records, and case-note analysis of hospital records. Qualitative data will be gathered via structured interviews with lung cancer patients, GPs, and hospital specialists. The study will be conducted in five study sites across three states in Australia. Anglo-Australian patients and patients from five CALD groups (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, Greek, Italian and Vietnamese communities) will mainly be identified through the list of new cases presented at lung multidisciplinary team meetings. For the quantitative component, it is anticipated that 724 patients (362 Anglo-Australian and 362 CALD patients) will be recruited to obtain a final sample of 290 (145 per group) assuming a 50% patient survey completion rate and a 80% GP record review completion rate. For the qualitative component, 60 interviews with lung cancer patients (10 Anglo-Australian and 10 patients per CALD group), 20 interviews with GPs, and 20 interviews with specialists will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This is the first Australian study to compare the time intervals along the lung cancer diagnostic pathway between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients. The study will also explore the underlying patient, healthcare provider, and health system factors that influence the time intervals in the two groups. This information will improve our understanding of the effect of ethnicity on health outcomes among lung cancer patients and will inform future interventions aimed at early diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer, particularly patients from CALD backgrounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was retrospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000957392, date registered: 4th July 2017). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60547382018-07-23 The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds Mazza, Danielle Lin, Xiaoping Walter, Fiona M. Young, Jane M. Barnes, David J. Mitchell, Paul Brijnath, Bianca Martin, Andrew Emery, Jon D. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) are a vulnerable group for lung cancer with higher mortality rates than Caucasian patients. The aim of this study is to explore differences in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients and factors underlying these differences. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational cohort study using a mixed-method approach. Quantitative data regarding time intervals in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways will be gathered via patient surveys, General practitioner (GP) review of general practice records, and case-note analysis of hospital records. Qualitative data will be gathered via structured interviews with lung cancer patients, GPs, and hospital specialists. The study will be conducted in five study sites across three states in Australia. Anglo-Australian patients and patients from five CALD groups (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, Greek, Italian and Vietnamese communities) will mainly be identified through the list of new cases presented at lung multidisciplinary team meetings. For the quantitative component, it is anticipated that 724 patients (362 Anglo-Australian and 362 CALD patients) will be recruited to obtain a final sample of 290 (145 per group) assuming a 50% patient survey completion rate and a 80% GP record review completion rate. For the qualitative component, 60 interviews with lung cancer patients (10 Anglo-Australian and 10 patients per CALD group), 20 interviews with GPs, and 20 interviews with specialists will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This is the first Australian study to compare the time intervals along the lung cancer diagnostic pathway between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients. The study will also explore the underlying patient, healthcare provider, and health system factors that influence the time intervals in the two groups. This information will improve our understanding of the effect of ethnicity on health outcomes among lung cancer patients and will inform future interventions aimed at early diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer, particularly patients from CALD backgrounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was retrospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000957392, date registered: 4th July 2017). BioMed Central 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6054738/ /pubmed/30031382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mazza, Danielle Lin, Xiaoping Walter, Fiona M. Young, Jane M. Barnes, David J. Mitchell, Paul Brijnath, Bianca Martin, Andrew Emery, Jon D. The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title | The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title_full | The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title_fullStr | The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title_full_unstemmed | The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title_short | The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds |
title_sort | lead study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (cald) backgrounds compared to patients from anglo-australian backgrounds |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzadanielle theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT linxiaoping theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT walterfionam theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT youngjanem theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT barnesdavidj theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT mitchellpaul theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT brijnathbianca theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT martinandrew theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT emeryjond theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT mazzadanielle leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT linxiaoping leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT walterfionam leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT youngjanem leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT barnesdavidj leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT mitchellpaul leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT brijnathbianca leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT martinandrew leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds AT emeryjond leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds |