Cargando…

The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Ling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazza, Danielle, Lin, Xiaoping, Walter, Fiona M., Young, Jane M., Barnes, David J., Mitchell, Paul, Brijnath, Bianca, Martin, Andrew, Emery, Jon D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4
_version_ 1783341054568693760
author Mazza, Danielle
Lin, Xiaoping
Walter, Fiona M.
Young, Jane M.
Barnes, David J.
Mitchell, Paul
Brijnath, Bianca
Martin, Andrew
Emery, Jon D.
author_facet Mazza, Danielle
Lin, Xiaoping
Walter, Fiona M.
Young, Jane M.
Barnes, David J.
Mitchell, Paul
Brijnath, Bianca
Martin, Andrew
Emery, Jon D.
author_sort Mazza, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) are a vulnerable group for lung cancer with higher mortality rates than Caucasian patients. The aim of this study is to explore differences in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients and factors underlying these differences. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational cohort study using a mixed-method approach. Quantitative data regarding time intervals in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways will be gathered via patient surveys, General practitioner (GP) review of general practice records, and case-note analysis of hospital records. Qualitative data will be gathered via structured interviews with lung cancer patients, GPs, and hospital specialists. The study will be conducted in five study sites across three states in Australia. Anglo-Australian patients and patients from five CALD groups (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, Greek, Italian and Vietnamese communities) will mainly be identified through the list of new cases presented at lung multidisciplinary team meetings. For the quantitative component, it is anticipated that 724 patients (362 Anglo-Australian and 362 CALD patients) will be recruited to obtain a final sample of 290 (145 per group) assuming a 50% patient survey completion rate and a 80% GP record review completion rate. For the qualitative component, 60 interviews with lung cancer patients (10 Anglo-Australian and 10 patients per CALD group), 20 interviews with GPs, and 20 interviews with specialists will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This is the first Australian study to compare the time intervals along the lung cancer diagnostic pathway between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients. The study will also explore the underlying patient, healthcare provider, and health system factors that influence the time intervals in the two groups. This information will improve our understanding of the effect of ethnicity on health outcomes among lung cancer patients and will inform future interventions aimed at early diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer, particularly patients from CALD backgrounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was retrospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000957392, date registered: 4th July 2017).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6054738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60547382018-07-23 The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds Mazza, Danielle Lin, Xiaoping Walter, Fiona M. Young, Jane M. Barnes, David J. Mitchell, Paul Brijnath, Bianca Martin, Andrew Emery, Jon D. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment is a key factor in reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. To achieve this, it is important to understand the diagnostic pathways of cancer patients. Patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) are a vulnerable group for lung cancer with higher mortality rates than Caucasian patients. The aim of this study is to explore differences in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients and factors underlying these differences. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational cohort study using a mixed-method approach. Quantitative data regarding time intervals in the lung cancer diagnostic pathways will be gathered via patient surveys, General practitioner (GP) review of general practice records, and case-note analysis of hospital records. Qualitative data will be gathered via structured interviews with lung cancer patients, GPs, and hospital specialists. The study will be conducted in five study sites across three states in Australia. Anglo-Australian patients and patients from five CALD groups (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, Greek, Italian and Vietnamese communities) will mainly be identified through the list of new cases presented at lung multidisciplinary team meetings. For the quantitative component, it is anticipated that 724 patients (362 Anglo-Australian and 362 CALD patients) will be recruited to obtain a final sample of 290 (145 per group) assuming a 50% patient survey completion rate and a 80% GP record review completion rate. For the qualitative component, 60 interviews with lung cancer patients (10 Anglo-Australian and 10 patients per CALD group), 20 interviews with GPs, and 20 interviews with specialists will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This is the first Australian study to compare the time intervals along the lung cancer diagnostic pathway between CALD and Anglo-Australian patients. The study will also explore the underlying patient, healthcare provider, and health system factors that influence the time intervals in the two groups. This information will improve our understanding of the effect of ethnicity on health outcomes among lung cancer patients and will inform future interventions aimed at early diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer, particularly patients from CALD backgrounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was retrospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000957392, date registered: 4th July 2017). BioMed Central 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6054738/ /pubmed/30031382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mazza, Danielle
Lin, Xiaoping
Walter, Fiona M.
Young, Jane M.
Barnes, David J.
Mitchell, Paul
Brijnath, Bianca
Martin, Andrew
Emery, Jon D.
The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title_full The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title_fullStr The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title_full_unstemmed The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title_short The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds
title_sort lead study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (cald) backgrounds compared to patients from anglo-australian backgrounds
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4671-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzadanielle theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT linxiaoping theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT walterfionam theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT youngjanem theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT barnesdavidj theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT mitchellpaul theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT brijnathbianca theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT martinandrew theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT emeryjond theleadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT mazzadanielle leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT linxiaoping leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT walterfionam leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT youngjanem leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT barnesdavidj leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT mitchellpaul leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT brijnathbianca leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT martinandrew leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds
AT emeryjond leadstudyprotocolamixedmethodcohortstudyevaluatingthelungcancerdiagnosticandpretreatmentpathwaysofpatientsfromculturallyandlinguisticallydiversecaldbackgroundscomparedtopatientsfromangloaustralianbackgrounds