Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study
BACKGROUND: The metabolism of many proton pump inhibitors is influenced by CYP2C19 genotype, which is a limitation of their use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety profile of Z-215 (azeloprazole sodium) as initial treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE), dose response, and optimal dose c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2018.03.004 |
_version_ | 1783341062269435904 |
---|---|
author | Kinoshita, Yoshikazu Kusano, Motoyasu Iwakiri, Katsuhiko Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro Tachikawa, Naoto Haruma, Ken |
author_facet | Kinoshita, Yoshikazu Kusano, Motoyasu Iwakiri, Katsuhiko Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro Tachikawa, Naoto Haruma, Ken |
author_sort | Kinoshita, Yoshikazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The metabolism of many proton pump inhibitors is influenced by CYP2C19 genotype, which is a limitation of their use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety profile of Z-215 (azeloprazole sodium) as initial treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE), dose response, and optimal dose compared with rabeprazole sodium (RPZ). METHODS: We conducted an exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in Japan. Patients with RE aged ≥20 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive 10, 20, or 40 mg Z-215 or 10 mg RPZ (1:1:1:1), and orally administered the respective drug for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the endoscopic healing rate after 8 weeks of treatment (at Week 8). We also assessed the effects of CYP2C19 genotype. Safety end points were the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients received the study drugs (10 mg Z-215: 125 patients, 20 mg Z-215: 126 patients, 40 mg Z-215: 126 patients, and 10 mg RPZ: 126 patients). The endoscopic healing rate at Week 8 was above 95% in all groups (10 mg Z-215: 95.2%, 20 mg Z-215: 96.8%, 40 mg Z-215: 95.2%, and 10 mg RPZ: 96.8%). The endoscopic healing rate and serum gastrin levels of the Z-215 groups were not influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. In patients with Grade C/D, the endoscopic healing rate at Week 4 was slightly higher in the 40-mg Z-215 group compared with the other groups. Incidences of adverse events/adverse drug reactions did not markedly differ between the Z-215 and 10-mg RPZ groups. CONCLUSIONS: Z-215 was as effective and well tolerated as 10 mg RPZ in the treatment of RE in this selected population. CYP2C19 genotype status may not influence the efficacy and safety of Z-215. There were no clear dose–response effects between Z-215 doses in the endoscopic healing of RE. These findings suggest that Z-215 may be 1 option for the initial treatment of RE. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 02463643. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60547722018-07-23 Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study Kinoshita, Yoshikazu Kusano, Motoyasu Iwakiri, Katsuhiko Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro Tachikawa, Naoto Haruma, Ken Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Original Research BACKGROUND: The metabolism of many proton pump inhibitors is influenced by CYP2C19 genotype, which is a limitation of their use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety profile of Z-215 (azeloprazole sodium) as initial treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE), dose response, and optimal dose compared with rabeprazole sodium (RPZ). METHODS: We conducted an exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in Japan. Patients with RE aged ≥20 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive 10, 20, or 40 mg Z-215 or 10 mg RPZ (1:1:1:1), and orally administered the respective drug for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the endoscopic healing rate after 8 weeks of treatment (at Week 8). We also assessed the effects of CYP2C19 genotype. Safety end points were the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients received the study drugs (10 mg Z-215: 125 patients, 20 mg Z-215: 126 patients, 40 mg Z-215: 126 patients, and 10 mg RPZ: 126 patients). The endoscopic healing rate at Week 8 was above 95% in all groups (10 mg Z-215: 95.2%, 20 mg Z-215: 96.8%, 40 mg Z-215: 95.2%, and 10 mg RPZ: 96.8%). The endoscopic healing rate and serum gastrin levels of the Z-215 groups were not influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. In patients with Grade C/D, the endoscopic healing rate at Week 4 was slightly higher in the 40-mg Z-215 group compared with the other groups. Incidences of adverse events/adverse drug reactions did not markedly differ between the Z-215 and 10-mg RPZ groups. CONCLUSIONS: Z-215 was as effective and well tolerated as 10 mg RPZ in the treatment of RE in this selected population. CYP2C19 genotype status may not influence the efficacy and safety of Z-215. There were no clear dose–response effects between Z-215 doses in the endoscopic healing of RE. These findings suggest that Z-215 may be 1 option for the initial treatment of RE. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 02463643. Elsevier 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6054772/ /pubmed/30038671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2018.03.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kinoshita, Yoshikazu Kusano, Motoyasu Iwakiri, Katsuhiko Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro Tachikawa, Naoto Haruma, Ken Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety profile of z-215 (azeloprazole sodium), a proton pump inhibitor, compared with rabeprazole sodium in patients with reflux esophagitis: a phase ii, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2018.03.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinoshitayoshikazu efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy AT kusanomotoyasu efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy AT iwakirikatsuhiko efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy AT fujishiromitsuhiro efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy AT tachikawanaoto efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy AT harumaken efficacyandsafetyprofileofz215azeloprazolesodiumaprotonpumpinhibitorcomparedwithrabeprazolesodiuminpatientswithrefluxesophagitisaphaseiimulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy |