Cargando…
Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z |
_version_ | 1783341073473470464 |
---|---|
author | Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom |
author_facet | Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom |
author_sort | Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlooked TPFs. METHODS: Medical records for 137 patients, prospectively registered during 18 years by the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) (a national register), were studied. The inclusion criterion was a delayed diagnosis of a fracture in the knee following a trauma. Case records, legal assessments, and evaluations by specialist doctors were reviewed, and the consequences of the delayed diagnosis for outcome and treatment were registered. RESULTS: Only 58 patients (42%) had been evaluated according to PKRs. In 53 patient cases, the fracture was not diagnosed on radiographs obtained at the first medical contact. However, in 84% of these cases, the fracture was visible or was suspected by retrospective evaluation. 50 out of 79 patients, for whom X-rays were not obtained, were candidates for radiographs according to PKRs, 17 cases lacked information to evaluate by PKRs and 12 cases were not candidates. In 53% of all cases, it was evaluated that the fracture position had worsened at the time of diagnosis. A significant disability compensation was granted in 36% of cases due to the delayed identification of fractures, totaling 841,000 EUR. CONCLUSIONS: The major reasons for overlooking TPFs were 1) difficulty in recognizing the fractures on X-rays and 2) that X-ray decision rules were not employed. Two thirds of the patients, for whom a radiograph had not been prescribed, would have had an X-ray, if the PKRs had been used. Overlooking TPFs significantly increased patient disability in one third of cases. We recommend that healthcare professionals in the ER use X-ray decision rules in addition to clinical examination to avoid overlooking TPFs. When standard radiographs are evaluated as normal in patients that are clinically suspect of a TPF, oblique X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT)-scan should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6054858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60548582018-07-23 Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlooked TPFs. METHODS: Medical records for 137 patients, prospectively registered during 18 years by the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) (a national register), were studied. The inclusion criterion was a delayed diagnosis of a fracture in the knee following a trauma. Case records, legal assessments, and evaluations by specialist doctors were reviewed, and the consequences of the delayed diagnosis for outcome and treatment were registered. RESULTS: Only 58 patients (42%) had been evaluated according to PKRs. In 53 patient cases, the fracture was not diagnosed on radiographs obtained at the first medical contact. However, in 84% of these cases, the fracture was visible or was suspected by retrospective evaluation. 50 out of 79 patients, for whom X-rays were not obtained, were candidates for radiographs according to PKRs, 17 cases lacked information to evaluate by PKRs and 12 cases were not candidates. In 53% of all cases, it was evaluated that the fracture position had worsened at the time of diagnosis. A significant disability compensation was granted in 36% of cases due to the delayed identification of fractures, totaling 841,000 EUR. CONCLUSIONS: The major reasons for overlooking TPFs were 1) difficulty in recognizing the fractures on X-rays and 2) that X-ray decision rules were not employed. Two thirds of the patients, for whom a radiograph had not been prescribed, would have had an X-ray, if the PKRs had been used. Overlooking TPFs significantly increased patient disability in one third of cases. We recommend that healthcare professionals in the ER use X-ray decision rules in addition to clinical examination to avoid overlooking TPFs. When standard radiographs are evaluated as normal in patients that are clinically suspect of a TPF, oblique X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT)-scan should be considered. BioMed Central 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6054858/ /pubmed/30031386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title | Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title_full | Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title_fullStr | Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title_full_unstemmed | Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title_short | Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
title_sort | why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kielceciliemullerup whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked AT mikkelsenkimlyngby whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked AT krogsgaardmichaelrindom whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked |