Cargando…

Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup, Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby, Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z
_version_ 1783341073473470464
author Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup
Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby
Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom
author_facet Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup
Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby
Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom
author_sort Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlooked TPFs. METHODS: Medical records for 137 patients, prospectively registered during 18 years by the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) (a national register), were studied. The inclusion criterion was a delayed diagnosis of a fracture in the knee following a trauma. Case records, legal assessments, and evaluations by specialist doctors were reviewed, and the consequences of the delayed diagnosis for outcome and treatment were registered. RESULTS: Only 58 patients (42%) had been evaluated according to PKRs. In 53 patient cases, the fracture was not diagnosed on radiographs obtained at the first medical contact. However, in 84% of these cases, the fracture was visible or was suspected by retrospective evaluation. 50 out of 79 patients, for whom X-rays were not obtained, were candidates for radiographs according to PKRs, 17 cases lacked information to evaluate by PKRs and 12 cases were not candidates. In 53% of all cases, it was evaluated that the fracture position had worsened at the time of diagnosis. A significant disability compensation was granted in 36% of cases due to the delayed identification of fractures, totaling 841,000 EUR. CONCLUSIONS: The major reasons for overlooking TPFs were 1) difficulty in recognizing the fractures on X-rays and 2) that X-ray decision rules were not employed. Two thirds of the patients, for whom a radiograph had not been prescribed, would have had an X-ray, if the PKRs had been used. Overlooking TPFs significantly increased patient disability in one third of cases. We recommend that healthcare professionals in the ER use X-ray decision rules in addition to clinical examination to avoid overlooking TPFs. When standard radiographs are evaluated as normal in patients that are clinically suspect of a TPF, oblique X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT)-scan should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6054858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60548582018-07-23 Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are sometimes overlooked in the emergency room (ER). Using a national register covering 18 years we aimed to find out why and to evaluate if use of a specific radiographic decision rule, Pittsburgh Knee Rules (PKRs), could have reduced the number of overlooked TPFs. METHODS: Medical records for 137 patients, prospectively registered during 18 years by the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) (a national register), were studied. The inclusion criterion was a delayed diagnosis of a fracture in the knee following a trauma. Case records, legal assessments, and evaluations by specialist doctors were reviewed, and the consequences of the delayed diagnosis for outcome and treatment were registered. RESULTS: Only 58 patients (42%) had been evaluated according to PKRs. In 53 patient cases, the fracture was not diagnosed on radiographs obtained at the first medical contact. However, in 84% of these cases, the fracture was visible or was suspected by retrospective evaluation. 50 out of 79 patients, for whom X-rays were not obtained, were candidates for radiographs according to PKRs, 17 cases lacked information to evaluate by PKRs and 12 cases were not candidates. In 53% of all cases, it was evaluated that the fracture position had worsened at the time of diagnosis. A significant disability compensation was granted in 36% of cases due to the delayed identification of fractures, totaling 841,000 EUR. CONCLUSIONS: The major reasons for overlooking TPFs were 1) difficulty in recognizing the fractures on X-rays and 2) that X-ray decision rules were not employed. Two thirds of the patients, for whom a radiograph had not been prescribed, would have had an X-ray, if the PKRs had been used. Overlooking TPFs significantly increased patient disability in one third of cases. We recommend that healthcare professionals in the ER use X-ray decision rules in addition to clinical examination to avoid overlooking TPFs. When standard radiographs are evaluated as normal in patients that are clinically suspect of a TPF, oblique X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT)-scan should be considered. BioMed Central 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6054858/ /pubmed/30031386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup
Mikkelsen, Kim Lyngby
Krogsgaard, Michael Rindom
Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title_full Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title_fullStr Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title_full_unstemmed Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title_short Why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
title_sort why tibial plateau fractures are overlooked
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30031386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2170-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kielceciliemullerup whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked
AT mikkelsenkimlyngby whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked
AT krogsgaardmichaelrindom whytibialplateaufracturesareoverlooked