Cargando…

An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) remains a common health problem and one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions found among developed and developing nations. The following paper reports on an updated search of the current literature into the prevalence of LBP among African nations and highl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Linzette Deidrè, Daniels, Kurt John, Ganguli, Bhaswati, Louw, Quinette Abegail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2075-x
_version_ 1783341154057584640
author Morris, Linzette Deidrè
Daniels, Kurt John
Ganguli, Bhaswati
Louw, Quinette Abegail
author_facet Morris, Linzette Deidrè
Daniels, Kurt John
Ganguli, Bhaswati
Louw, Quinette Abegail
author_sort Morris, Linzette Deidrè
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) remains a common health problem and one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions found among developed and developing nations. The following paper reports on an updated search of the current literature into the prevalence of LBP among African nations and highlights the specific challenges faced in retrieving epidemiological information in Africa. METHODS: A comprehensive search of all accessible bibliographic databases was conducted. Population-based studies into the prevalence of LBP among children/adolescents and adults living in Africa were included. Methodological quality of included studies was appraised using an adapted tool. Meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and publication bias were also conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies were included in this review. The majority of the studies were conducted in Nigeria (n = 31;47%) and South Africa (n = 16;25%). Forty-three included studies (66.2%) were found to be of higher methodological quality. The pooled lifetime, annual and point prevalence of LBP in Africa was 47% (95% CI 37;58); 57% (95% CI 51;63) and 39% (95% CI 30;47), respectively. CONCLUSION: This review found that the lifetime, annual and point prevalence of LBP among African nations was considerably higher than or comparable to global LBP prevalence estimates reported. Due to the poor methodological quality found among many of the included studies, the over-representation of affluent countries and the difficulty in sourcing and retrieving potential African studies, it is recommended that future African LBP researchers conduct methodologically robust studies and report their findings in accessible resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original protocol of this systematic review was initially registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42014010417 on 09 July 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6055346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60553462018-07-30 An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses Morris, Linzette Deidrè Daniels, Kurt John Ganguli, Bhaswati Louw, Quinette Abegail BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) remains a common health problem and one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions found among developed and developing nations. The following paper reports on an updated search of the current literature into the prevalence of LBP among African nations and highlights the specific challenges faced in retrieving epidemiological information in Africa. METHODS: A comprehensive search of all accessible bibliographic databases was conducted. Population-based studies into the prevalence of LBP among children/adolescents and adults living in Africa were included. Methodological quality of included studies was appraised using an adapted tool. Meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and publication bias were also conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies were included in this review. The majority of the studies were conducted in Nigeria (n = 31;47%) and South Africa (n = 16;25%). Forty-three included studies (66.2%) were found to be of higher methodological quality. The pooled lifetime, annual and point prevalence of LBP in Africa was 47% (95% CI 37;58); 57% (95% CI 51;63) and 39% (95% CI 30;47), respectively. CONCLUSION: This review found that the lifetime, annual and point prevalence of LBP among African nations was considerably higher than or comparable to global LBP prevalence estimates reported. Due to the poor methodological quality found among many of the included studies, the over-representation of affluent countries and the difficulty in sourcing and retrieving potential African studies, it is recommended that future African LBP researchers conduct methodologically robust studies and report their findings in accessible resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original protocol of this systematic review was initially registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42014010417 on 09 July 2014. BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6055346/ /pubmed/30037323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2075-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morris, Linzette Deidrè
Daniels, Kurt John
Ganguli, Bhaswati
Louw, Quinette Abegail
An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_fullStr An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_short An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_sort update on the prevalence of low back pain in africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2075-x
work_keys_str_mv AT morrislinzettedeidre anupdateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT danielskurtjohn anupdateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT gangulibhaswati anupdateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT louwquinetteabegail anupdateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT morrislinzettedeidre updateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT danielskurtjohn updateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT gangulibhaswati updateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT louwquinetteabegail updateontheprevalenceoflowbackpaininafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses