Cargando…

Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect

The limiting effects of stressors like desiccation, light and salinity on seagrass growth and distribution are well-studied. However, little is known about their interactive effects, and whether such effects might differ among populations that are adapted to different local conditions. In two labora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suykerbuyk, Wouter, Govers, Laura L., van Oven, W.G., Giesen, Kris, Giesen, Wim B.J.T., de Jong, Dick J., Bouma, Tjeerd J., van Katwijk, Marieke M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042889
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5234
_version_ 1783341223435567104
author Suykerbuyk, Wouter
Govers, Laura L.
van Oven, W.G.
Giesen, Kris
Giesen, Wim B.J.T.
de Jong, Dick J.
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
van Katwijk, Marieke M.
author_facet Suykerbuyk, Wouter
Govers, Laura L.
van Oven, W.G.
Giesen, Kris
Giesen, Wim B.J.T.
de Jong, Dick J.
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
van Katwijk, Marieke M.
author_sort Suykerbuyk, Wouter
collection PubMed
description The limiting effects of stressors like desiccation, light and salinity on seagrass growth and distribution are well-studied. However, little is known about their interactive effects, and whether such effects might differ among populations that are adapted to different local conditions. In two laboratory experiments we tested (a) if growth and development of intertidal, temperate Zostera noltii is affected by emergence time (experiment 1 and 2), and (b) how this is affected by an additional, second stressor, namely shading (experiment 1) or high salinity (25, 30 and 35, experiment 2). In addition, we tested (c) whether the effects of emergence time and salinity varied between three different European seagrass populations (Saint-Jacut/France, Oosterschelde/The Netherlands, and Sylt/Germany), which are likely adapted to different salinity levels (experiment 2). In both experiments, emergence of 8 h per tidal cycle (of 12 h) had a negative effect on seagrass relative growth rate (RGR), and aboveground biomass. Emergence furthermore reduced either rhizome length (experiment 1) or belowground biomass (experiment 2). Shading (experiment 1) resulted in lower RGR and a two-fold higher aboveground/belowground ratio. We found no interactive effects of emergence and shading stress. Salinity (experiment 2) did not affect seagrass growth or morphology of any of the three populations. The three tested populations differed greatly in morphology but showed no differential response to emergence or salinity level (experiment 2). Our results indicate that emergence time and shading show an additive negative effect (no synergistic or antagonistic effect), making the plants still vulnerable to such combination, a combination that may occur as a consequence of self-shading during emergence or resulting from algal cover. Emergence time likely determines the upper limit of Z. noltii and such shading will likely lower the upper limit. Shading resulted in higher aboveground/belowground ratios as is a general response in seagrass. Z. noltii of different populations originating from salinity 30 and 35 seem tolerant to variations in salinity within the tested range. Our results indicate that the three tested populations show morphotypic rather than ecotypic variation, at least regarding the salinity and emergence, as there were no interactive effects with origin. For restoration, this implies that the salinity regime of the donor and receptor site of Z. noltii is of no concern within the salinity range 25–35.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6055680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60556802018-07-24 Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect Suykerbuyk, Wouter Govers, Laura L. van Oven, W.G. Giesen, Kris Giesen, Wim B.J.T. de Jong, Dick J. Bouma, Tjeerd J. van Katwijk, Marieke M. PeerJ Ecology The limiting effects of stressors like desiccation, light and salinity on seagrass growth and distribution are well-studied. However, little is known about their interactive effects, and whether such effects might differ among populations that are adapted to different local conditions. In two laboratory experiments we tested (a) if growth and development of intertidal, temperate Zostera noltii is affected by emergence time (experiment 1 and 2), and (b) how this is affected by an additional, second stressor, namely shading (experiment 1) or high salinity (25, 30 and 35, experiment 2). In addition, we tested (c) whether the effects of emergence time and salinity varied between three different European seagrass populations (Saint-Jacut/France, Oosterschelde/The Netherlands, and Sylt/Germany), which are likely adapted to different salinity levels (experiment 2). In both experiments, emergence of 8 h per tidal cycle (of 12 h) had a negative effect on seagrass relative growth rate (RGR), and aboveground biomass. Emergence furthermore reduced either rhizome length (experiment 1) or belowground biomass (experiment 2). Shading (experiment 1) resulted in lower RGR and a two-fold higher aboveground/belowground ratio. We found no interactive effects of emergence and shading stress. Salinity (experiment 2) did not affect seagrass growth or morphology of any of the three populations. The three tested populations differed greatly in morphology but showed no differential response to emergence or salinity level (experiment 2). Our results indicate that emergence time and shading show an additive negative effect (no synergistic or antagonistic effect), making the plants still vulnerable to such combination, a combination that may occur as a consequence of self-shading during emergence or resulting from algal cover. Emergence time likely determines the upper limit of Z. noltii and such shading will likely lower the upper limit. Shading resulted in higher aboveground/belowground ratios as is a general response in seagrass. Z. noltii of different populations originating from salinity 30 and 35 seem tolerant to variations in salinity within the tested range. Our results indicate that the three tested populations show morphotypic rather than ecotypic variation, at least regarding the salinity and emergence, as there were no interactive effects with origin. For restoration, this implies that the salinity regime of the donor and receptor site of Z. noltii is of no concern within the salinity range 25–35. PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6055680/ /pubmed/30042889 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5234 Text en © 2018 Suykerbuyk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Suykerbuyk, Wouter
Govers, Laura L.
van Oven, W.G.
Giesen, Kris
Giesen, Wim B.J.T.
de Jong, Dick J.
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
van Katwijk, Marieke M.
Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title_full Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title_fullStr Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title_full_unstemmed Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title_short Living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
title_sort living in the intertidal: desiccation and shading reduce seagrass growth, but high salinity or population of origin have no additional effect
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042889
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5234
work_keys_str_mv AT suykerbuykwouter livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT goverslaural livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT vanovenwg livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT giesenkris livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT giesenwimbjt livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT dejongdickj livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT boumatjeerdj livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect
AT vankatwijkmariekem livingintheintertidaldesiccationandshadingreduceseagrassgrowthbuthighsalinityorpopulationoforiginhavenoadditionaleffect