Cargando…

In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics

INTRODUCTION: The unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory. A simple theoretical model of the UEG was previously proposed and tested in silico. METHOD AND RESULTS: The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orini, Michele, Taggart, Peter, Lambiase, Pier D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29660191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.13606
_version_ 1783341232357900288
author Orini, Michele
Taggart, Peter
Lambiase, Pier D.
author_facet Orini, Michele
Taggart, Peter
Lambiase, Pier D.
author_sort Orini, Michele
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory. A simple theoretical model of the UEG was previously proposed and tested in silico. METHOD AND RESULTS: The aim of this study was to use epicardial sock‐mapping data to validate the simple model's predictions of unipolar electrogram morphology in the in vivo human heart. The simple model conceptualizes the UEG as the difference between a local cardiac action potential and a position‐independent component representing remote activity, which is defined as the average of all action potentials. UEGs were recorded in 18 patients using a multielectrode sock containing 240 electrodes and activation (AT) and repolarization time (RT) were measured using standard definitions. For each cardiac site, a simulated local action potential was generated by adjusting a stylized action potential to fit AT and RT measured in vivo. The correlation coefficient (cc) measuring the morphological similarity between 13,637 recorded and simulated UEGs was cc  =  0.89 (0.72–0.95), median (Q(1)–Q(3)), for the entire UEG, cc  =  0.90 (0.76–0.95) for QRS complexes, and cc  =  0.83 (0.58–0.92) for T‐waves. QRS and T‐wave areas from recorded and simulated UEGs showed cc> 0.89 and cc> 0.84, respectively, indicating good agreement between voltage isochrones maps. Simulated UEGs accurately reproduced the interaction between AT and QRS morphology and between RT and T‐wave morphology observed in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Human in vivo whole heart data support the validity of the simple model, which provides a framework for improving the understanding of the UEG and its clinical utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6055721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60557212018-07-23 In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics Orini, Michele Taggart, Peter Lambiase, Pier D. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory. A simple theoretical model of the UEG was previously proposed and tested in silico. METHOD AND RESULTS: The aim of this study was to use epicardial sock‐mapping data to validate the simple model's predictions of unipolar electrogram morphology in the in vivo human heart. The simple model conceptualizes the UEG as the difference between a local cardiac action potential and a position‐independent component representing remote activity, which is defined as the average of all action potentials. UEGs were recorded in 18 patients using a multielectrode sock containing 240 electrodes and activation (AT) and repolarization time (RT) were measured using standard definitions. For each cardiac site, a simulated local action potential was generated by adjusting a stylized action potential to fit AT and RT measured in vivo. The correlation coefficient (cc) measuring the morphological similarity between 13,637 recorded and simulated UEGs was cc  =  0.89 (0.72–0.95), median (Q(1)–Q(3)), for the entire UEG, cc  =  0.90 (0.76–0.95) for QRS complexes, and cc  =  0.83 (0.58–0.92) for T‐waves. QRS and T‐wave areas from recorded and simulated UEGs showed cc> 0.89 and cc> 0.84, respectively, indicating good agreement between voltage isochrones maps. Simulated UEGs accurately reproduced the interaction between AT and QRS morphology and between RT and T‐wave morphology observed in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Human in vivo whole heart data support the validity of the simple model, which provides a framework for improving the understanding of the UEG and its clinical utility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-03 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6055721/ /pubmed/29660191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.13606 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Orini, Michele
Taggart, Peter
Lambiase, Pier D.
In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title_full In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title_fullStr In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title_full_unstemmed In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title_short In vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
title_sort in vivo human sock‐mapping validation of a simple model that explains unipolar electrogram morphology in relation to conduction‐repolarization dynamics
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29660191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.13606
work_keys_str_mv AT orinimichele invivohumansockmappingvalidationofasimplemodelthatexplainsunipolarelectrogrammorphologyinrelationtoconductionrepolarizationdynamics
AT taggartpeter invivohumansockmappingvalidationofasimplemodelthatexplainsunipolarelectrogrammorphologyinrelationtoconductionrepolarizationdynamics
AT lambiasepierd invivohumansockmappingvalidationofasimplemodelthatexplainsunipolarelectrogrammorphologyinrelationtoconductionrepolarizationdynamics