Cargando…

Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), where the diagnostic accuracy of (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xiaojiang, Zhao, Long, Guo, Xiuyu, Zhao, Liang, Wu, Jing, Huang, Jingxiong, Sun, Long, Xie, Chengrong, Chen, Haojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050321
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S168374
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), where the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, we retrospectively evaluated 87 patients with 116 VCFs. MRI was performed in all the 87 patients, whereas (18)F-FDG PET/CT was executed in 51 patients. Three malignant features (convex posterior cortex, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement) from MRI and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) from (18)F-FDG PET/CT were evaluated in benign and malignant VCFs, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT were compared in the differentiation of malignant from benign VCFs. RESULTS: The results of our investigation showed that the sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignant VCFs were 75.6% and 77.3% for convex posterior cortex, 82.9% and 813% for epidural mass formation, and 85.7% and 70.8% for pedicle enhancement. (18)F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated higher sensitivity (100%) but lower specificity (38.9%) as compared to MRI with regard to differentiation between benign and malignant VCFs. A significant difference in the SUV(max) values was observed between the benign and malignant fractures (2.9 ± 1.0 vs 5.0 ± 1.8, P < 0.01). Besides the value of SUV(max), it has been noticed that the FDG uptake pattern differed in malignant and benign fractures. CONCLUSION: Significant MRI findings such as convex posterior cortex, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement are highly suggestive of malignancy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT reliably differentiated the fractures of malignant from benign based on both SUV(max) and (18)F-FDG uptake pattern. In a situation where MRI findings are not diagnostic, (18)F-FDG PET/CT provides additional information as it has high sensitivity and is semiquantitative.