Cargando…

The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness

BACKGROUND: In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVES: This study examined th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryant, Elizabeth, Murtagh, Shemane, Finucane, Laura, McCrum, Carol, Mercer, Christopher, Smith, Toby, Canby, Guy, Rowe, David A., Moore, Ann P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1715
_version_ 1783341262475100160
author Bryant, Elizabeth
Murtagh, Shemane
Finucane, Laura
McCrum, Carol
Mercer, Christopher
Smith, Toby
Canby, Guy
Rowe, David A.
Moore, Ann P.
author_facet Bryant, Elizabeth
Murtagh, Shemane
Finucane, Laura
McCrum, Carol
Mercer, Christopher
Smith, Toby
Canby, Guy
Rowe, David A.
Moore, Ann P.
author_sort Bryant, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the validity and reliability of the newly developed Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM) within physiotherapy outpatient settings. METHODS: Two hundred twenty‐four patients attending physiotherapy outpatient departments in South East England with an MSK condition participated in this study. The BmPROM was assessed for user friendliness (rated feedback, N = 224), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability, n = 42), validity (internal and external construct validity, N = 224), and responsiveness (internal, n = 25). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two‐factor model provides a good fit to the data. Factors were representative of “Functionality” and “Wellbeing”. Correlations observed between the BmPROM and SF‐36 domains provided evidence of convergent validity. Reliability results indicated that both subscales were internally consistent with alphas above the acceptable limits for both “Functionality” (α = .85, 95% CI [.81, .88]) and ‘Wellbeing’ (α = .80, 95% CI [.75, .84]). Test–retest analyses (n = 42) demonstrated a high degree of reliability between “Functionality” (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]) and “Wellbeing” scores (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]). Further examination of test–retest reliability through the Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the difference between “Functionality” and “Wellbeing” test scores did not vary as a function of absolute test score. Large treatment effect sizes were found for both subscales (Functionality d = 1.10; Wellbeing 1.03). CONCLUSION: The BmPROM is a reliable and valid outcome measure for use in evaluating physiotherapy treatment of MSK conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6055852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60558522018-07-30 The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness Bryant, Elizabeth Murtagh, Shemane Finucane, Laura McCrum, Carol Mercer, Christopher Smith, Toby Canby, Guy Rowe, David A. Moore, Ann P. Physiother Res Int Research Articles BACKGROUND: In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the validity and reliability of the newly developed Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM) within physiotherapy outpatient settings. METHODS: Two hundred twenty‐four patients attending physiotherapy outpatient departments in South East England with an MSK condition participated in this study. The BmPROM was assessed for user friendliness (rated feedback, N = 224), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability, n = 42), validity (internal and external construct validity, N = 224), and responsiveness (internal, n = 25). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two‐factor model provides a good fit to the data. Factors were representative of “Functionality” and “Wellbeing”. Correlations observed between the BmPROM and SF‐36 domains provided evidence of convergent validity. Reliability results indicated that both subscales were internally consistent with alphas above the acceptable limits for both “Functionality” (α = .85, 95% CI [.81, .88]) and ‘Wellbeing’ (α = .80, 95% CI [.75, .84]). Test–retest analyses (n = 42) demonstrated a high degree of reliability between “Functionality” (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]) and “Wellbeing” scores (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]). Further examination of test–retest reliability through the Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the difference between “Functionality” and “Wellbeing” test scores did not vary as a function of absolute test score. Large treatment effect sizes were found for both subscales (Functionality d = 1.10; Wellbeing 1.03). CONCLUSION: The BmPROM is a reliable and valid outcome measure for use in evaluating physiotherapy treatment of MSK conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-11 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6055852/ /pubmed/29749667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1715 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bryant, Elizabeth
Murtagh, Shemane
Finucane, Laura
McCrum, Carol
Mercer, Christopher
Smith, Toby
Canby, Guy
Rowe, David A.
Moore, Ann P.
The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title_full The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title_fullStr The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title_short The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
title_sort brighton musculoskeletal patient‐reported outcome measure (bmprom): an assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1715
work_keys_str_mv AT bryantelizabeth thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT murtaghshemane thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT finucanelaura thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mccrumcarol thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mercerchristopher thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT smithtoby thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT canbyguy thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT rowedavida thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mooreannp thebrightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT bryantelizabeth brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT murtaghshemane brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT finucanelaura brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mccrumcarol brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mercerchristopher brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT smithtoby brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT canbyguy brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT rowedavida brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness
AT mooreannp brightonmusculoskeletalpatientreportedoutcomemeasurebmpromanassessmentofvalidityreliabilityandresponsiveness