Cargando…

Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing

To investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kręcisz, Krzysztof, Kuczyński, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042878
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5101
_version_ 1783341315615883264
author Kręcisz, Krzysztof
Kuczyński, Michał
author_facet Kręcisz, Krzysztof
Kuczyński, Michał
author_sort Kręcisz, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description To investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials the simple auditory reaction time (RT) was measured. Based on the COP data, the following sway parameters were computed: standard deviation (SD), mean speed (MV), sample entropy (SE), and mean power frequency (MPF). The RT was higher in the VFB condition (p < 0.001) indicating that this condition was attention demanding. The VFB resulted in decreased SD and increased SE in both the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes (p < .001). These results account for the efficacy of the VFB in stabilizing posture and in producing more irregular COP signals which may be interpreted as higher automaticity and/or larger level of noise in postural control. The MPF was higher during VFB in both planes as was the MV in the AP plane only (p < 0.001). The latter data demonstrate higher activity of postural control system that was caused by the availability of the set-point on the screen and the resulting control error which facilitated and sped up postural control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6056264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60562642018-07-24 Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing Kręcisz, Krzysztof Kuczyński, Michał PeerJ Bioengineering To investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials the simple auditory reaction time (RT) was measured. Based on the COP data, the following sway parameters were computed: standard deviation (SD), mean speed (MV), sample entropy (SE), and mean power frequency (MPF). The RT was higher in the VFB condition (p < 0.001) indicating that this condition was attention demanding. The VFB resulted in decreased SD and increased SE in both the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes (p < .001). These results account for the efficacy of the VFB in stabilizing posture and in producing more irregular COP signals which may be interpreted as higher automaticity and/or larger level of noise in postural control. The MPF was higher during VFB in both planes as was the MV in the AP plane only (p < 0.001). The latter data demonstrate higher activity of postural control system that was caused by the availability of the set-point on the screen and the resulting control error which facilitated and sped up postural control. PeerJ Inc. 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6056264/ /pubmed/30042878 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5101 Text en ©2018 Kręcisz and Kuczyński http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioengineering
Kręcisz, Krzysztof
Kuczyński, Michał
Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_full Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_fullStr Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_full_unstemmed Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_short Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_sort attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
topic Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042878
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5101
work_keys_str_mv AT kreciszkrzysztof attentionaldemandsassociatedwithaugmentedvisualfeedbackduringquietstanding
AT kuczynskimichał attentionaldemandsassociatedwithaugmentedvisualfeedbackduringquietstanding