Cargando…

Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait

Introduction: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a powerful determinant of falls in Parkinson's disease (PD). Automatic postural reactions serve as a protective strategy to prevent falling after perturbations. However, differences in automatic postural reactions between patients with and without FOG in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekkers, Esther M. J., Van Rossom, Sam, Heremans, Elke, Dockx, Kim, Devan, Surendar, Verschueren, Sabine M. P., Nieuwboer, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00540
_version_ 1783341372587114496
author Bekkers, Esther M. J.
Van Rossom, Sam
Heremans, Elke
Dockx, Kim
Devan, Surendar
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Nieuwboer, Alice
author_facet Bekkers, Esther M. J.
Van Rossom, Sam
Heremans, Elke
Dockx, Kim
Devan, Surendar
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Nieuwboer, Alice
author_sort Bekkers, Esther M. J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a powerful determinant of falls in Parkinson's disease (PD). Automatic postural reactions serve as a protective strategy to prevent falling after perturbations. However, differences in automatic postural reactions between patients with and without FOG in response to perturbation are at present unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the response patterns and neuromuscular control between PD patients with and without FOG and healthy controls (HCs) after postural perturbations. Methods: 28 PD patients (15 FOG+, 13 FOG−) and 22 HCs were included. Participants stood on a moveable platform while random perturbations were imposed. The first anterior platform translation was retained for analysis. Center of pressure (CoP) and center of mass (CoM) trajectories and trunk, knee and ankle angles were compared between the three groups using the Statistical Parametric Mapping technique, allowing to capture changes in time. In addition, muscle activation of lower leg muscles was measured using EMG. Results: At baseline, FOG+ stood with more trunk flexion than HCs (p = 0.005), a result not found in FOG−. Following a perturbation, FOG+ reacted with increased trunk extension (p = 0.004) in comparison to HCs, a pattern not observed in FOG−. The CoM showed greater backward displacement in FOG− and FOG+ (p = 0.008, p = 0.027). Both FOG+ and FOG− showed increased co-activation of agonist and antagonist muscles compared to HCs (p = 0.010), with no differences between FOG+ and FOG−. Conclusions: Automatic postural reactions after a sudden perturbation are similar between PD subgroups with and without FOG but different from HCs. Reactive postural control, largely regulated by brain stem centers, seems to be modulated by different mechanisms than those governing freezing of gait. Greater differences in initial stance position, enhanced by joint stiffening, could however underlie maladaptive postural responses and increase susceptibility for balance loss in FOG+ compared to FOG−.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6056632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60566322018-07-31 Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait Bekkers, Esther M. J. Van Rossom, Sam Heremans, Elke Dockx, Kim Devan, Surendar Verschueren, Sabine M. P. Nieuwboer, Alice Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a powerful determinant of falls in Parkinson's disease (PD). Automatic postural reactions serve as a protective strategy to prevent falling after perturbations. However, differences in automatic postural reactions between patients with and without FOG in response to perturbation are at present unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the response patterns and neuromuscular control between PD patients with and without FOG and healthy controls (HCs) after postural perturbations. Methods: 28 PD patients (15 FOG+, 13 FOG−) and 22 HCs were included. Participants stood on a moveable platform while random perturbations were imposed. The first anterior platform translation was retained for analysis. Center of pressure (CoP) and center of mass (CoM) trajectories and trunk, knee and ankle angles were compared between the three groups using the Statistical Parametric Mapping technique, allowing to capture changes in time. In addition, muscle activation of lower leg muscles was measured using EMG. Results: At baseline, FOG+ stood with more trunk flexion than HCs (p = 0.005), a result not found in FOG−. Following a perturbation, FOG+ reacted with increased trunk extension (p = 0.004) in comparison to HCs, a pattern not observed in FOG−. The CoM showed greater backward displacement in FOG− and FOG+ (p = 0.008, p = 0.027). Both FOG+ and FOG− showed increased co-activation of agonist and antagonist muscles compared to HCs (p = 0.010), with no differences between FOG+ and FOG−. Conclusions: Automatic postural reactions after a sudden perturbation are similar between PD subgroups with and without FOG but different from HCs. Reactive postural control, largely regulated by brain stem centers, seems to be modulated by different mechanisms than those governing freezing of gait. Greater differences in initial stance position, enhanced by joint stiffening, could however underlie maladaptive postural responses and increase susceptibility for balance loss in FOG+ compared to FOG−. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6056632/ /pubmed/30065694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00540 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bekkers, Van Rossom, Heremans, Dockx, Devan, Verschueren and Nieuwboer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Bekkers, Esther M. J.
Van Rossom, Sam
Heremans, Elke
Dockx, Kim
Devan, Surendar
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Nieuwboer, Alice
Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title_full Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title_fullStr Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title_full_unstemmed Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title_short Adaptations to Postural Perturbations in Patients With Freezing of Gait
title_sort adaptations to postural perturbations in patients with freezing of gait
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00540
work_keys_str_mv AT bekkersesthermj adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT vanrossomsam adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT heremanselke adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT dockxkim adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT devansurendar adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT verschuerensabinemp adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait
AT nieuwboeralice adaptationstoposturalperturbationsinpatientswithfreezingofgait