Cargando…

Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects

BACKGROUND: Every day in the ICU, legal issues arise while treating sedated, unconscious, and legally incapacitated patients. Whenever a life-saving treatment cannot be discussed in a timely manner with an unconscious patient, doctors are required by law to act according to the substituted judgment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stark, Doreen, Stiller, Ruth, Xie, Min, Weber, Damian, Maggiorini, Marco, Hilty, Matthias Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30062013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0311-y
_version_ 1783341420191416320
author Stark, Doreen
Stiller, Ruth
Xie, Min
Weber, Damian
Maggiorini, Marco
Hilty, Matthias Peter
author_facet Stark, Doreen
Stiller, Ruth
Xie, Min
Weber, Damian
Maggiorini, Marco
Hilty, Matthias Peter
author_sort Stark, Doreen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every day in the ICU, legal issues arise while treating sedated, unconscious, and legally incapacitated patients. Whenever a life-saving treatment cannot be discussed in a timely manner with an unconscious patient, doctors are required by law to act according to the substituted judgment standard. However, if it is not survival that is at stake, but conservation of reproduction and the potential side effects are significant, the decision-making process becomes much more difficult. Legal issues associated with possible harm to the patient on the one hand and ethical issues with presumable benefit of the intervention on the other hand give rise to difficult decisions. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 24-year-old patient with Goodpasture syndrome. Because of rapid aggravation of kidney function and alveolar hemorrhage—the latter requiring an urgent initiation of mechanical ventilation—therapy with steroids, plasmapheresis, and cyclophosphamide was immediately required. Knowledge of the negative impact on fertility brought up the question about sperm cryopreservation. According to the substituted judgment standard, together with the mother of the patient and based on interdisciplinary evaluation of the situation with specialists from the reproductive endocrinology and urology department, the decision for a testicular sperm extraction in the absence of the possibility to obtain the patient’s informed consent was made. Immediate chemotherapy was initiated and continued after the procedure. The patient recovered from the acute illness and was informed retrospectively about the testicular sperm extraction, which he received extremely positively. CONCLUSION: Our aim is to highlight the legal objectives and ethical aspects of a non-lifesaving but fertility-preserving intervention in an unconscious patient. The need for decision-making in this kind of situation is rare and therefore challenging. The present case may serve to encourage and guide other doctors in similar situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6056934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60569342018-07-30 Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects Stark, Doreen Stiller, Ruth Xie, Min Weber, Damian Maggiorini, Marco Hilty, Matthias Peter J Intensive Care Case Report BACKGROUND: Every day in the ICU, legal issues arise while treating sedated, unconscious, and legally incapacitated patients. Whenever a life-saving treatment cannot be discussed in a timely manner with an unconscious patient, doctors are required by law to act according to the substituted judgment standard. However, if it is not survival that is at stake, but conservation of reproduction and the potential side effects are significant, the decision-making process becomes much more difficult. Legal issues associated with possible harm to the patient on the one hand and ethical issues with presumable benefit of the intervention on the other hand give rise to difficult decisions. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 24-year-old patient with Goodpasture syndrome. Because of rapid aggravation of kidney function and alveolar hemorrhage—the latter requiring an urgent initiation of mechanical ventilation—therapy with steroids, plasmapheresis, and cyclophosphamide was immediately required. Knowledge of the negative impact on fertility brought up the question about sperm cryopreservation. According to the substituted judgment standard, together with the mother of the patient and based on interdisciplinary evaluation of the situation with specialists from the reproductive endocrinology and urology department, the decision for a testicular sperm extraction in the absence of the possibility to obtain the patient’s informed consent was made. Immediate chemotherapy was initiated and continued after the procedure. The patient recovered from the acute illness and was informed retrospectively about the testicular sperm extraction, which he received extremely positively. CONCLUSION: Our aim is to highlight the legal objectives and ethical aspects of a non-lifesaving but fertility-preserving intervention in an unconscious patient. The need for decision-making in this kind of situation is rare and therefore challenging. The present case may serve to encourage and guide other doctors in similar situations. BioMed Central 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6056934/ /pubmed/30062013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0311-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Stark, Doreen
Stiller, Ruth
Xie, Min
Weber, Damian
Maggiorini, Marco
Hilty, Matthias Peter
Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title_full Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title_fullStr Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title_full_unstemmed Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title_short Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
title_sort preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with goodpasture syndrome—medicolegal and ethical aspects
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30062013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0311-y
work_keys_str_mv AT starkdoreen preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects
AT stillerruth preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects
AT xiemin preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects
AT weberdamian preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects
AT maggiorinimarco preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects
AT hiltymatthiaspeter preservingfertilityinanunconsciouspatientwithgoodpasturesyndromemedicolegalandethicalaspects