Cargando…

The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess prognostic value of metastatic pelvic lymph node (mPLN) in early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Also, we sought to define a high-risk group using prognosticators for recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Jeanny, Eom, Keun-Young, Kim, Young Seok, Park, Won, Chun, Mison, Lee, Jihae, Kim, Yong Bae, Yoon, Won Sup, Kim, Jin Hee, Choi, Jin Hwa, Chang, Sei Kyung, Jeong, Bae Kwon, Lee, Seok Ho, Cha, Jihye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.346
_version_ 1783341430777839616
author Kwon, Jeanny
Eom, Keun-Young
Kim, Young Seok
Park, Won
Chun, Mison
Lee, Jihae
Kim, Yong Bae
Yoon, Won Sup
Kim, Jin Hee
Choi, Jin Hwa
Chang, Sei Kyung
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Lee, Seok Ho
Cha, Jihye
author_facet Kwon, Jeanny
Eom, Keun-Young
Kim, Young Seok
Park, Won
Chun, Mison
Lee, Jihae
Kim, Yong Bae
Yoon, Won Sup
Kim, Jin Hee
Choi, Jin Hwa
Chang, Sei Kyung
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Lee, Seok Ho
Cha, Jihye
author_sort Kwon, Jeanny
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to assess prognostic value of metastatic pelvic lymph node (mPLN) in early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Also, we sought to define a high-risk group using prognosticators for recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the data from 13 Korean institutions from 2000 to 2010. A total of 249 IB-IIA patients with high-risk factors were included. We evaluated distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in relation to clinicopathologic factors including pNstage, number of mPLN, lymph node (LN)ratio (number of positive LN/number of harvested LN), and log odds of mPLNs (log(number of positive LN+0.5/number of negative LN+0.5)). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC] vs. others), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of mPLNs (≤ 3 vs. > 3), LN ratio (≤ 17% vs. > 17%), and log odds of mPLNs (≤ ‒0.58 vs. > ‒0.58) were significant prognosticators for DMFS and DFS. Resection margin involvement only affected DFS. No significant survival difference was observed between pN0 patients and patients with 1-3 mPLNs. Multivariate analysis revealed that mPLN > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC were unfavorable index for both DMFS (p < 0.001, p=0.020, and p=0.031, respectively) and DFS (p < 0.001, p=0.017, and p=0.001, respectively). A scoring system using these three factors predicts risk of recurrence with relatively high concordance index (DMFS, 0.69; DFS, 0.71). CONCLUSION: mPLN > 3 in early-stage cervical cancer affects DMFS and DFS. A scoring system using mPLNs > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC could stratify risk groups of recurrence in surgically resected early-stage cervix cancer with high-risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6056979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60569792018-07-27 The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04) Kwon, Jeanny Eom, Keun-Young Kim, Young Seok Park, Won Chun, Mison Lee, Jihae Kim, Yong Bae Yoon, Won Sup Kim, Jin Hee Choi, Jin Hwa Chang, Sei Kyung Jeong, Bae Kwon Lee, Seok Ho Cha, Jihye Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: We aimed to assess prognostic value of metastatic pelvic lymph node (mPLN) in early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Also, we sought to define a high-risk group using prognosticators for recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the data from 13 Korean institutions from 2000 to 2010. A total of 249 IB-IIA patients with high-risk factors were included. We evaluated distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in relation to clinicopathologic factors including pNstage, number of mPLN, lymph node (LN)ratio (number of positive LN/number of harvested LN), and log odds of mPLNs (log(number of positive LN+0.5/number of negative LN+0.5)). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC] vs. others), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of mPLNs (≤ 3 vs. > 3), LN ratio (≤ 17% vs. > 17%), and log odds of mPLNs (≤ ‒0.58 vs. > ‒0.58) were significant prognosticators for DMFS and DFS. Resection margin involvement only affected DFS. No significant survival difference was observed between pN0 patients and patients with 1-3 mPLNs. Multivariate analysis revealed that mPLN > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC were unfavorable index for both DMFS (p < 0.001, p=0.020, and p=0.031, respectively) and DFS (p < 0.001, p=0.017, and p=0.001, respectively). A scoring system using these three factors predicts risk of recurrence with relatively high concordance index (DMFS, 0.69; DFS, 0.71). CONCLUSION: mPLN > 3 in early-stage cervical cancer affects DMFS and DFS. A scoring system using mPLNs > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC could stratify risk groups of recurrence in surgically resected early-stage cervix cancer with high-risk factors. Korean Cancer Association 2018-07 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6056979/ /pubmed/29081219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.346 Text en Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwon, Jeanny
Eom, Keun-Young
Kim, Young Seok
Park, Won
Chun, Mison
Lee, Jihae
Kim, Yong Bae
Yoon, Won Sup
Kim, Jin Hee
Choi, Jin Hwa
Chang, Sei Kyung
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Lee, Seok Ho
Cha, Jihye
The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title_full The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title_fullStr The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title_short The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
title_sort prognostic impact of the number of metastatic lymph nodes and a new prognostic scoring system for recurrence in early-stage cervical cancer with high risk factors: a multicenter cohort study (krog 15-04)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6056979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.346
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonjeanny theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT eomkeunyoung theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimyoungseok theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT parkwon theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT chunmison theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT leejihae theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimyongbae theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT yoonwonsup theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimjinhee theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT choijinhwa theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT changseikyung theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT jeongbaekwon theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT leeseokho theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT chajihye theprognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kwonjeanny prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT eomkeunyoung prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimyoungseok prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT parkwon prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT chunmison prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT leejihae prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimyongbae prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT yoonwonsup prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT kimjinhee prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT choijinhwa prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT changseikyung prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT jeongbaekwon prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT leeseokho prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504
AT chajihye prognosticimpactofthenumberofmetastaticlymphnodesandanewprognosticscoringsystemforrecurrenceinearlystagecervicalcancerwithhighriskfactorsamulticentercohortstudykrog1504