Cargando…
Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients
BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear. In addition, variability between the results of clinical trials has been observed. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment in patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30041625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0857-5 |
_version_ | 1783341447106265088 |
---|---|
author | Blanco-Silvente, Lídia Capellà, Dolors Garre-Olmo, Josep Vilalta-Franch, Joan Castells, Xavier |
author_facet | Blanco-Silvente, Lídia Capellà, Dolors Garre-Olmo, Josep Vilalta-Franch, Joan Castells, Xavier |
author_sort | Blanco-Silvente, Lídia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear. In addition, variability between the results of clinical trials has been observed. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment in patients with AD and to determine the predictor effect of patient, intervention, and study design related covariates. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials was performed. Primary outcomes were all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events (AE) and efficacy on cognitive function. Odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Meta-regression was conducted to identify related covariates. Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of included trials. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 5004 patients were included. No differences between memantine and placebo were found for all-cause treatment discontinuation (OR=0.97 [0.82, 1.14]) and discontinuation due to AE (OR=1.18 [0.91, 1.53]). Memantine showed small improvement on cognitive function (SMD=0.15 [0.08, 0.22]). Baseline functional ability was positively associated with all-cause treatment discontinuation and discontinuation due to AE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that memantine has a very small efficacy on AD symptomatology and its safety profile is similar to that of placebo. No evidence of treatment discontinuation improvement with memantine is found, indicating a dubious risk-benefit relationship. No intervention characteristic or subgroup of patients clearly shows a significantly better risk-benefit relationship. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42014015696. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6057050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60570502018-07-30 Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients Blanco-Silvente, Lídia Capellà, Dolors Garre-Olmo, Josep Vilalta-Franch, Joan Castells, Xavier BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear. In addition, variability between the results of clinical trials has been observed. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk-benefit relationship of memantine treatment in patients with AD and to determine the predictor effect of patient, intervention, and study design related covariates. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials was performed. Primary outcomes were all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events (AE) and efficacy on cognitive function. Odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Meta-regression was conducted to identify related covariates. Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of included trials. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 5004 patients were included. No differences between memantine and placebo were found for all-cause treatment discontinuation (OR=0.97 [0.82, 1.14]) and discontinuation due to AE (OR=1.18 [0.91, 1.53]). Memantine showed small improvement on cognitive function (SMD=0.15 [0.08, 0.22]). Baseline functional ability was positively associated with all-cause treatment discontinuation and discontinuation due to AE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that memantine has a very small efficacy on AD symptomatology and its safety profile is similar to that of placebo. No evidence of treatment discontinuation improvement with memantine is found, indicating a dubious risk-benefit relationship. No intervention characteristic or subgroup of patients clearly shows a significantly better risk-benefit relationship. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42014015696. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6057050/ /pubmed/30041625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0857-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blanco-Silvente, Lídia Capellà, Dolors Garre-Olmo, Josep Vilalta-Franch, Joan Castells, Xavier Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title | Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title_full | Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title_fullStr | Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title_short | Predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
title_sort | predictors of discontinuation, efficacy, and safety of memantine treatment for alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 18 randomized clinical trials involving 5004 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30041625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0857-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blancosilventelidia predictorsofdiscontinuationefficacyandsafetyofmemantinetreatmentforalzheimersdiseasemetaanalysisandmetaregressionof18randomizedclinicaltrialsinvolving5004patients AT capelladolors predictorsofdiscontinuationefficacyandsafetyofmemantinetreatmentforalzheimersdiseasemetaanalysisandmetaregressionof18randomizedclinicaltrialsinvolving5004patients AT garreolmojosep predictorsofdiscontinuationefficacyandsafetyofmemantinetreatmentforalzheimersdiseasemetaanalysisandmetaregressionof18randomizedclinicaltrialsinvolving5004patients AT vilaltafranchjoan predictorsofdiscontinuationefficacyandsafetyofmemantinetreatmentforalzheimersdiseasemetaanalysisandmetaregressionof18randomizedclinicaltrialsinvolving5004patients AT castellsxavier predictorsofdiscontinuationefficacyandsafetyofmemantinetreatmentforalzheimersdiseasemetaanalysisandmetaregressionof18randomizedclinicaltrialsinvolving5004patients |