Cargando…

Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of manual and powered irrigation of the middle ear using saline or 1% baby shampoo to treat biofilm‐forming bacterial middle ear infections. BACKGROUND: Biofilms play a major role in recalcitrant otitis media and are challenging to treat. Many therapeuti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abi Hachem, Ralph, Goncalves, Stefania, Walker, Thomas, Angeli, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30062140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.164
_version_ 1783341484744900608
author Abi Hachem, Ralph
Goncalves, Stefania
Walker, Thomas
Angeli, Simon
author_facet Abi Hachem, Ralph
Goncalves, Stefania
Walker, Thomas
Angeli, Simon
author_sort Abi Hachem, Ralph
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of manual and powered irrigation of the middle ear using saline or 1% baby shampoo to treat biofilm‐forming bacterial middle ear infections. BACKGROUND: Biofilms play a major role in recalcitrant otitis media and are challenging to treat. Many therapeutic strategies have been attempted and the role of topical therapies is still being investigated. Topical irrigation using saline or 1% baby shampoo and the use of a hydrodebrider have been investigated in biofilms involved in chronic rhinosinusitis and their role within the middle ear is yet to be determined. METHODS: Twenty‐two adult chinchillas underwent bilateral trans‐bullar inoculation of non‐typable biofilm forming Haemophilus influenza followed by unilateral middle ear irrigation 5 days later using saline administered via a powered hydrodebrider or manual irrigation of saline or 1% baby shampoo. Contralateral inoculated ears served as control and were not irrigated. Two days following irrigation, the bullae were harvested and processed for scanning electron microscopy to assess biofilm surface area. Auditory brainstem responses were performed before bacterial inoculation and prior to euthanasia. RESULTS: Manual and powered irrigation were effective in reducing the surface area of biofilm when compared to the control group. The hydrodebrider demonstrated to be more effective at eradicating biofilm than manual irrigation, especially in areas of difficult access, such as the ventral portion of the chinchillas' bullae. There was no difference in manual irrigation of saline when compared to 1% baby shampoo. Irrigations either manually or using the hydrodebrider did not affect hearing, the vestibular system or facial function. CONCLUSION: Middle ear biofilms can be treated safely and effectively with rinses using either normal saline or 1% baby shampoo administered manually or with a powered hydrodebrider. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6057225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60572252018-07-30 Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media Abi Hachem, Ralph Goncalves, Stefania Walker, Thomas Angeli, Simon Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of manual and powered irrigation of the middle ear using saline or 1% baby shampoo to treat biofilm‐forming bacterial middle ear infections. BACKGROUND: Biofilms play a major role in recalcitrant otitis media and are challenging to treat. Many therapeutic strategies have been attempted and the role of topical therapies is still being investigated. Topical irrigation using saline or 1% baby shampoo and the use of a hydrodebrider have been investigated in biofilms involved in chronic rhinosinusitis and their role within the middle ear is yet to be determined. METHODS: Twenty‐two adult chinchillas underwent bilateral trans‐bullar inoculation of non‐typable biofilm forming Haemophilus influenza followed by unilateral middle ear irrigation 5 days later using saline administered via a powered hydrodebrider or manual irrigation of saline or 1% baby shampoo. Contralateral inoculated ears served as control and were not irrigated. Two days following irrigation, the bullae were harvested and processed for scanning electron microscopy to assess biofilm surface area. Auditory brainstem responses were performed before bacterial inoculation and prior to euthanasia. RESULTS: Manual and powered irrigation were effective in reducing the surface area of biofilm when compared to the control group. The hydrodebrider demonstrated to be more effective at eradicating biofilm than manual irrigation, especially in areas of difficult access, such as the ventral portion of the chinchillas' bullae. There was no difference in manual irrigation of saline when compared to 1% baby shampoo. Irrigations either manually or using the hydrodebrider did not affect hearing, the vestibular system or facial function. CONCLUSION: Middle ear biofilms can be treated safely and effectively with rinses using either normal saline or 1% baby shampoo administered manually or with a powered hydrodebrider. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6057225/ /pubmed/30062140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.164 Text en © 2018 The Authors Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Abi Hachem, Ralph
Goncalves, Stefania
Walker, Thomas
Angeli, Simon
Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title_full Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title_fullStr Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title_full_unstemmed Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title_short Middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
title_sort middle ear irrigation using a hydrodebrider decreases biofilm surface area in an animal model of otitis media
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30062140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.164
work_keys_str_mv AT abihachemralph middleearirrigationusingahydrodebriderdecreasesbiofilmsurfaceareainananimalmodelofotitismedia
AT goncalvesstefania middleearirrigationusingahydrodebriderdecreasesbiofilmsurfaceareainananimalmodelofotitismedia
AT walkerthomas middleearirrigationusingahydrodebriderdecreasesbiofilmsurfaceareainananimalmodelofotitismedia
AT angelisimon middleearirrigationusingahydrodebriderdecreasesbiofilmsurfaceareainananimalmodelofotitismedia