Cargando…

Correlation Between Lateralization Index of Adrenal Venous Sampling and Standardized Outcome in Primary Aldosteronism

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) lateralization cutoffs on surgical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cosyntropin-stimulated AVS was used to guide surgical management of 377 patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) who were evaluated 6 mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umakoshi, Hironobu, Tsuiki, Mika, Yokomoto-Umakoshi, Maki, Takeda, Yoshiyu, Takashi, Yoneda, Kurihara, Isao, Itoh, Hiroshi, Katabami, Takuyuki, Ichijo, Takamasa, Wada, Norio, Shibayama, Yui, Yoshimoto, Takanobu, Ashida, Kenji, Ogawa, Yoshihiro, Kawashima, Junji, Sone, Masakatsu, Inagaki, Nobuya, Takahashi, Katsutoshi, Watanabe, Minemori, Matsuda, Yuichi, Kobayashi, Hiroki, Shibata, Hirotaka, Kamemura, Kohei, Otsuki, Michio, Fujii, Yuichi, Yamamto, Koichi, Ogo, Atsushi, Okamura, Shintaro, Miyauchi, Shozo, Fukuoka, Tomikazu, Izawa, Shoichiro, Yanase, Toshihiko, Hashimoto, Shigeatsu, Yamada, Masanobu, Yoshikawa, Yuichiro, Kai, Tatsuya, Suzuki, Tomoko, Kawamura, Takashi, Naruse, Mitsuhide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Endocrine Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/js.2018-00055
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) lateralization cutoffs on surgical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cosyntropin-stimulated AVS was used to guide surgical management of 377 patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) who were evaluated 6 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients that achieved clinical benefit and complete biochemical success based on the AVS aldosterone lateralization index (LI) was determined. RESULTS: Clinical benefit was achieved in 29 of 47 patients with an LI between 2 and 4, in 66 of 101 with an LI between 4 and 10, and in 158 of 203 with an LI > 10 (P < 0.01 for trend). Complete biochemical success was achieved in 27 of 42 with an LI between 2 and 4, in 60 of 76 with an LI between 4 and 10, and in 127 of 155 with an LI > 10 (P = 0.024 for trend). After adjustment for confounders and using those patients with an LI between 2 and 4 as a reference, a clinical benefit was associated only with those with an LI > 10 (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.16), whereas complete biochemical success was associated with those with an LI between 4 and 10 (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.14 to 7.01) or LI > 10 (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.47 to 8.55). CONCLUSIONS: Difference of clinical outcome was relatively small when strict LI diagnostic threshold was used; biochemical cure was sufficiently achieved when an LI > 4 was used. Our study by standardized outcome measures validated that an LI > 4 may be appropriate for determining unilateral disease in PA.