Cargando…

Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study

Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Austr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalfe, Sylvia A, Hickerton, Chriselle, Savard, Jacqueline, Terrill, Bronwyn, Turbitt, Erin, Gaff, Clara, Gray, Kathleen, Middleton, Anna, Wilson, Brenda, Newson, Ainsley J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1
_version_ 1783341596882763776
author Metcalfe, Sylvia A
Hickerton, Chriselle
Savard, Jacqueline
Terrill, Bronwyn
Turbitt, Erin
Gaff, Clara
Gray, Kathleen
Middleton, Anna
Wilson, Brenda
Newson, Ainsley J
author_facet Metcalfe, Sylvia A
Hickerton, Chriselle
Savard, Jacqueline
Terrill, Bronwyn
Turbitt, Erin
Gaff, Clara
Gray, Kathleen
Middleton, Anna
Wilson, Brenda
Newson, Ainsley J
author_sort Metcalfe, Sylvia A
collection PubMed
description Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18–24, 25–49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what “personal genomics” might entail. Very few had heard of the term “direct-to-consumer” testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants’ understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6057916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60579162018-07-27 Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study Metcalfe, Sylvia A Hickerton, Chriselle Savard, Jacqueline Terrill, Bronwyn Turbitt, Erin Gaff, Clara Gray, Kathleen Middleton, Anna Wilson, Brenda Newson, Ainsley J Eur J Hum Genet Article Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18–24, 25–49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what “personal genomics” might entail. Very few had heard of the term “direct-to-consumer” testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants’ understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-30 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6057916/ /pubmed/29706641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Metcalfe, Sylvia A
Hickerton, Chriselle
Savard, Jacqueline
Terrill, Bronwyn
Turbitt, Erin
Gaff, Clara
Gray, Kathleen
Middleton, Anna
Wilson, Brenda
Newson, Ainsley J
Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title_full Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title_fullStr Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title_full_unstemmed Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title_short Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
title_sort australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the genioz study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfesylviaa australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT hickertonchriselle australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT savardjacqueline australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT terrillbronwyn australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT turbitterin australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT gaffclara australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT graykathleen australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT middletonanna australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT wilsonbrenda australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy
AT newsonainsleyj australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy