Cargando…
Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Austr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1 |
_version_ | 1783341596882763776 |
---|---|
author | Metcalfe, Sylvia A Hickerton, Chriselle Savard, Jacqueline Terrill, Bronwyn Turbitt, Erin Gaff, Clara Gray, Kathleen Middleton, Anna Wilson, Brenda Newson, Ainsley J |
author_facet | Metcalfe, Sylvia A Hickerton, Chriselle Savard, Jacqueline Terrill, Bronwyn Turbitt, Erin Gaff, Clara Gray, Kathleen Middleton, Anna Wilson, Brenda Newson, Ainsley J |
author_sort | Metcalfe, Sylvia A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18–24, 25–49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what “personal genomics” might entail. Very few had heard of the term “direct-to-consumer” testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants’ understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6057916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60579162018-07-27 Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study Metcalfe, Sylvia A Hickerton, Chriselle Savard, Jacqueline Terrill, Bronwyn Turbitt, Erin Gaff, Clara Gray, Kathleen Middleton, Anna Wilson, Brenda Newson, Ainsley J Eur J Hum Genet Article Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18–24, 25–49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what “personal genomics” might entail. Very few had heard of the term “direct-to-consumer” testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants’ understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-30 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6057916/ /pubmed/29706641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Metcalfe, Sylvia A Hickerton, Chriselle Savard, Jacqueline Terrill, Bronwyn Turbitt, Erin Gaff, Clara Gray, Kathleen Middleton, Anna Wilson, Brenda Newson, Ainsley J Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title | Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title_full | Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title_fullStr | Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title_full_unstemmed | Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title_short | Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
title_sort | australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the genioz study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalfesylviaa australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT hickertonchriselle australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT savardjacqueline australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT terrillbronwyn australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT turbitterin australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT gaffclara australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT graykathleen australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT middletonanna australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT wilsonbrenda australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy AT newsonainsleyj australiansviewsonpersonalgenomictestingfocusgroupfindingsfromthegeniozstudy |