Cargando…

Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism

ESSENTIALS: A venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnostic strategy is economical compared to imaging alone. Applied a VTE diagnostic strategy to a D‐dimer multicenter study for cost‐minimization analysis. Average diagnostic test costs for patients were significantly lower with a diagnostic strategy. Imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Karan, Legnani, Cristina, Palareti, Gualtiero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12008
_version_ 1783341652190953472
author Verma, Karan
Legnani, Cristina
Palareti, Gualtiero
author_facet Verma, Karan
Legnani, Cristina
Palareti, Gualtiero
author_sort Verma, Karan
collection PubMed
description ESSENTIALS: A venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnostic strategy is economical compared to imaging alone. Applied a VTE diagnostic strategy to a D‐dimer multicenter study for cost‐minimization analysis. Average diagnostic test costs for patients were significantly lower with a diagnostic strategy. Implementation of a VTE diagnostic strategy reduces the diagnostic costs for a hospital. BACKGROUND: The burden of healthcare costs has substantially risen in the last few decades. One possible contributing factor to this increase are the diagnostic approaches for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using only imaging to exclude a diagnosis of VTE. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate cost minimization in the diagnosis of VTE by comparing standalone imaging (computed tomography pulmonary angiography and compression ultrasonography) to a published VTE diagnostic strategy incorporating assessment of pre‐test probability and D‐dimer testing. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a D‐dimer reagent where consecutive outpatients (n=747) with suspected VTE, including both pulmonary embolism (n=346) and deep venous thrombosis (n=401) were evaluated. By applying a VTE diagnostic strategy and using the proportion of patients that were diagnosed as VTE‐negative (n=137 for PE; n=120 for DVT), we developed a cost calculator to compare the average diagnostic test cost per suspected VTE patient, both before and after the implementation of the VTE diagnostic strategy. RESULTS: Implementation of the VTE diagnostic strategy reduced the average diagnostic test cost for a suspected PE patient by 38% and for a suspected DVT patient by 24%. Assuming the proportion of VTE suspected patients to be 30% PE and 70% DVT, the weighted average reduction in the diagnostic test cost per suspected VTE patient was 32%. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a VTE diagnostic strategy can allow hospitals to reduce costs without compromising patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6058208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60582082018-07-25 Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism Verma, Karan Legnani, Cristina Palareti, Gualtiero Res Pract Thromb Haemost Brief Reports ESSENTIALS: A venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnostic strategy is economical compared to imaging alone. Applied a VTE diagnostic strategy to a D‐dimer multicenter study for cost‐minimization analysis. Average diagnostic test costs for patients were significantly lower with a diagnostic strategy. Implementation of a VTE diagnostic strategy reduces the diagnostic costs for a hospital. BACKGROUND: The burden of healthcare costs has substantially risen in the last few decades. One possible contributing factor to this increase are the diagnostic approaches for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using only imaging to exclude a diagnosis of VTE. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate cost minimization in the diagnosis of VTE by comparing standalone imaging (computed tomography pulmonary angiography and compression ultrasonography) to a published VTE diagnostic strategy incorporating assessment of pre‐test probability and D‐dimer testing. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a D‐dimer reagent where consecutive outpatients (n=747) with suspected VTE, including both pulmonary embolism (n=346) and deep venous thrombosis (n=401) were evaluated. By applying a VTE diagnostic strategy and using the proportion of patients that were diagnosed as VTE‐negative (n=137 for PE; n=120 for DVT), we developed a cost calculator to compare the average diagnostic test cost per suspected VTE patient, both before and after the implementation of the VTE diagnostic strategy. RESULTS: Implementation of the VTE diagnostic strategy reduced the average diagnostic test cost for a suspected PE patient by 38% and for a suspected DVT patient by 24%. Assuming the proportion of VTE suspected patients to be 30% PE and 70% DVT, the weighted average reduction in the diagnostic test cost per suspected VTE patient was 32%. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a VTE diagnostic strategy can allow hospitals to reduce costs without compromising patient safety. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6058208/ /pubmed/30046674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12008 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Verma, Karan
Legnani, Cristina
Palareti, Gualtiero
Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title_full Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title_fullStr Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title_full_unstemmed Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title_short Cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: Comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating D‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
title_sort cost‐minimization analysis of venous thromboembolism diagnosis: comparison of standalone imaging with a strategy incorporating d‐dimer for exclusion of venous thromboembolism
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12008
work_keys_str_mv AT vermakaran costminimizationanalysisofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosiscomparisonofstandaloneimagingwithastrategyincorporatingddimerforexclusionofvenousthromboembolism
AT legnanicristina costminimizationanalysisofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosiscomparisonofstandaloneimagingwithastrategyincorporatingddimerforexclusionofvenousthromboembolism
AT palaretigualtiero costminimizationanalysisofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosiscomparisonofstandaloneimagingwithastrategyincorporatingddimerforexclusionofvenousthromboembolism