Cargando…

Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation

The radioisotope cobalt-60 (Co-60) is important for commercial, medical, and agricultural applications. Its widespread use has meant that Co-60 can be found in less secured facilities, leading to the fear that unauthorized persons could obtain and use it to produce a “dirty bomb”. This potential sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Jacquelyn W, Skornicki, Michelle, Cohen, Joshua T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079240
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14090.1
_version_ 1783341699303473152
author Chou, Jacquelyn W
Skornicki, Michelle
Cohen, Joshua T
author_facet Chou, Jacquelyn W
Skornicki, Michelle
Cohen, Joshua T
author_sort Chou, Jacquelyn W
collection PubMed
description The radioisotope cobalt-60 (Co-60) is important for commercial, medical, and agricultural applications. Its widespread use has meant that Co-60 can be found in less secured facilities, leading to the fear that unauthorized persons could obtain and use it to produce a “dirty bomb”. This potential security concern has led to government calls for phasing-out Co-60 and other radiation sources, despite ongoing safety and security regulations for handling, transport and use of radioactive sealed sources. This paper explores potential implications of phasing out radioisotopic technologies, including unintended safety and cost consequences for healthcare and food in the US and globally. The use of Co-60 for healthcare and agricultural applications is well-documented. Co-60 is used to sterilize single-use medical devices, tissue allografts, and a range of consumer products. Co-60 is used in Gamma Knife treatment of brain tumors in over 70,000 patients annually. Co-60 is also used to preserve food and kill insects and pathogens that cause food-borne illness. Co-60 is effective, reliable, and predictable. Limitations of alternative sterilization technologies include complex equipment, toxicities, incompatibilities with plastic, and physical hazards. Alternative ionizing radiation sources for wide-reaching applications, including e-beam and x-ray radiation, have advantages and drawbacks related to commercial scale capacity, penetrability, complexity and reliability. Identifying acceptable alternatives would require time, costs and lengthy regulatory review. FDA testing requirements and other hurdles would delay replacement of existing technologies and slow medical innovation, even delaying access to life-saving therapies.  A phase-out would raise manufacturing costs, and reduce supply-chain efficiencies, potentially increasing consumer prices, and reducing supply. These consequences are poorly understood and merit additional research. Given Co-60’s importance across medical and non-medical fields, restrictions on Co-60 warrant careful consideration and evaluation before adoption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6058460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60584602018-08-02 Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation Chou, Jacquelyn W Skornicki, Michelle Cohen, Joshua T F1000Res Opinion Article The radioisotope cobalt-60 (Co-60) is important for commercial, medical, and agricultural applications. Its widespread use has meant that Co-60 can be found in less secured facilities, leading to the fear that unauthorized persons could obtain and use it to produce a “dirty bomb”. This potential security concern has led to government calls for phasing-out Co-60 and other radiation sources, despite ongoing safety and security regulations for handling, transport and use of radioactive sealed sources. This paper explores potential implications of phasing out radioisotopic technologies, including unintended safety and cost consequences for healthcare and food in the US and globally. The use of Co-60 for healthcare and agricultural applications is well-documented. Co-60 is used to sterilize single-use medical devices, tissue allografts, and a range of consumer products. Co-60 is used in Gamma Knife treatment of brain tumors in over 70,000 patients annually. Co-60 is also used to preserve food and kill insects and pathogens that cause food-borne illness. Co-60 is effective, reliable, and predictable. Limitations of alternative sterilization technologies include complex equipment, toxicities, incompatibilities with plastic, and physical hazards. Alternative ionizing radiation sources for wide-reaching applications, including e-beam and x-ray radiation, have advantages and drawbacks related to commercial scale capacity, penetrability, complexity and reliability. Identifying acceptable alternatives would require time, costs and lengthy regulatory review. FDA testing requirements and other hurdles would delay replacement of existing technologies and slow medical innovation, even delaying access to life-saving therapies.  A phase-out would raise manufacturing costs, and reduce supply-chain efficiencies, potentially increasing consumer prices, and reducing supply. These consequences are poorly understood and merit additional research. Given Co-60’s importance across medical and non-medical fields, restrictions on Co-60 warrant careful consideration and evaluation before adoption. F1000 Research Limited 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6058460/ /pubmed/30079240 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14090.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Chou JW et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Chou, Jacquelyn W
Skornicki, Michelle
Cohen, Joshua T
Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title_full Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title_fullStr Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title_short Unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
title_sort unintended consequences of the potential phase-out of gamma irradiation
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079240
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14090.1
work_keys_str_mv AT choujacquelynw unintendedconsequencesofthepotentialphaseoutofgammairradiation
AT skornickimichelle unintendedconsequencesofthepotentialphaseoutofgammairradiation
AT cohenjoshuat unintendedconsequencesofthepotentialphaseoutofgammairradiation