Cargando…

Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagens, Marloes H.J., Burggraaff, Jessica, Kilsdonk, Iris D., de Vos, Marlieke L., Cawley, Niamh, Sbardella, Emilia, Andelova, Michaela, Amann, Michael, Lieb, Johanna M., Pantano, Patrizia, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., Killestein, Joep, Oreja-Guevara, Celia, Ciccarelli, Olga, Gasperini, Claudio, Lukas, Carsten, Wattjes, Mike P., Barkhof, Frederik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825
_version_ 1783341804888784896
author Hagens, Marloes H.J.
Burggraaff, Jessica
Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Vos, Marlieke L.
Cawley, Niamh
Sbardella, Emilia
Andelova, Michaela
Amann, Michael
Lieb, Johanna M.
Pantano, Patrizia
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Killestein, Joep
Oreja-Guevara, Celia
Ciccarelli, Olga
Gasperini, Claudio
Lukas, Carsten
Wattjes, Mike P.
Barkhof, Frederik
author_facet Hagens, Marloes H.J.
Burggraaff, Jessica
Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Vos, Marlieke L.
Cawley, Niamh
Sbardella, Emilia
Andelova, Michaela
Amann, Michael
Lieb, Johanna M.
Pantano, Patrizia
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Killestein, Joep
Oreja-Guevara, Celia
Ciccarelli, Olga
Gasperini, Claudio
Lukas, Carsten
Wattjes, Mike P.
Barkhof, Frederik
author_sort Hagens, Marloes H.J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients with CIS within 6 months from symptom onset and 26 healthy controls in 6 MS centers. All participants underwent 1.5T and 3T brain and spinal cord MRI at baseline according to local optimized protocols and the MAGNIMS guidelines. Patients who had not converted to MS during follow-up received repeat brain MRI at 3–6 months and 12–15 months. The number of lesions per anatomical region was scored by 3 raters in consensus. Criteria for dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time (DIT) were determined according to the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. RESULTS: Three-Tesla MRI detected 15% more T2 brain lesions compared to 1.5T (p < 0.001), which was driven by an increase in baseline detection of periventricular (12%, p = 0.015), (juxta)cortical (21%, p = 0.005), and deep white matter lesions (21%, p < 0.001). The detection rate of spinal cord lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions did not differ between field strengths. Three-Tesla MRI did not lead to a higher number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS or DIT, or subsequent diagnosis of MS, at any of the 3 time points. CONCLUSION: Scanning at 3T does not influence the diagnosis of MS according to McDonald diagnostic criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60590322018-07-26 Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study Hagens, Marloes H.J. Burggraaff, Jessica Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Vos, Marlieke L. Cawley, Niamh Sbardella, Emilia Andelova, Michaela Amann, Michael Lieb, Johanna M. Pantano, Patrizia Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Killestein, Joep Oreja-Guevara, Celia Ciccarelli, Olga Gasperini, Claudio Lukas, Carsten Wattjes, Mike P. Barkhof, Frederik Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients with CIS within 6 months from symptom onset and 26 healthy controls in 6 MS centers. All participants underwent 1.5T and 3T brain and spinal cord MRI at baseline according to local optimized protocols and the MAGNIMS guidelines. Patients who had not converted to MS during follow-up received repeat brain MRI at 3–6 months and 12–15 months. The number of lesions per anatomical region was scored by 3 raters in consensus. Criteria for dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time (DIT) were determined according to the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. RESULTS: Three-Tesla MRI detected 15% more T2 brain lesions compared to 1.5T (p < 0.001), which was driven by an increase in baseline detection of periventricular (12%, p = 0.015), (juxta)cortical (21%, p = 0.005), and deep white matter lesions (21%, p < 0.001). The detection rate of spinal cord lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions did not differ between field strengths. Three-Tesla MRI did not lead to a higher number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS or DIT, or subsequent diagnosis of MS, at any of the 3 time points. CONCLUSION: Scanning at 3T does not influence the diagnosis of MS according to McDonald diagnostic criteria. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6059032/ /pubmed/29925550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Hagens, Marloes H.J.
Burggraaff, Jessica
Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Vos, Marlieke L.
Cawley, Niamh
Sbardella, Emilia
Andelova, Michaela
Amann, Michael
Lieb, Johanna M.
Pantano, Patrizia
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Killestein, Joep
Oreja-Guevara, Celia
Ciccarelli, Olga
Gasperini, Claudio
Lukas, Carsten
Wattjes, Mike P.
Barkhof, Frederik
Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title_full Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title_fullStr Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title_short Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
title_sort three-tesla mri does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825
work_keys_str_mv AT hagensmarloeshj threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT burggraaffjessica threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT kilsdonkirisd threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT devosmarliekel threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT cawleyniamh threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT sbardellaemilia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT andelovamichaela threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT amannmichael threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT liebjohannam threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT pantanopatrizia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT killesteinjoep threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT orejaguevaracelia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT ciccarelliolga threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT gasperiniclaudio threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT lukascarsten threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT wattjesmikep threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT barkhoffrederik threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy
AT threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy