Cargando…
Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study
OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825 |
_version_ | 1783341804888784896 |
---|---|
author | Hagens, Marloes H.J. Burggraaff, Jessica Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Vos, Marlieke L. Cawley, Niamh Sbardella, Emilia Andelova, Michaela Amann, Michael Lieb, Johanna M. Pantano, Patrizia Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Killestein, Joep Oreja-Guevara, Celia Ciccarelli, Olga Gasperini, Claudio Lukas, Carsten Wattjes, Mike P. Barkhof, Frederik |
author_facet | Hagens, Marloes H.J. Burggraaff, Jessica Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Vos, Marlieke L. Cawley, Niamh Sbardella, Emilia Andelova, Michaela Amann, Michael Lieb, Johanna M. Pantano, Patrizia Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Killestein, Joep Oreja-Guevara, Celia Ciccarelli, Olga Gasperini, Claudio Lukas, Carsten Wattjes, Mike P. Barkhof, Frederik |
author_sort | Hagens, Marloes H.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients with CIS within 6 months from symptom onset and 26 healthy controls in 6 MS centers. All participants underwent 1.5T and 3T brain and spinal cord MRI at baseline according to local optimized protocols and the MAGNIMS guidelines. Patients who had not converted to MS during follow-up received repeat brain MRI at 3–6 months and 12–15 months. The number of lesions per anatomical region was scored by 3 raters in consensus. Criteria for dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time (DIT) were determined according to the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. RESULTS: Three-Tesla MRI detected 15% more T2 brain lesions compared to 1.5T (p < 0.001), which was driven by an increase in baseline detection of periventricular (12%, p = 0.015), (juxta)cortical (21%, p = 0.005), and deep white matter lesions (21%, p < 0.001). The detection rate of spinal cord lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions did not differ between field strengths. Three-Tesla MRI did not lead to a higher number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS or DIT, or subsequent diagnosis of MS, at any of the 3 time points. CONCLUSION: Scanning at 3T does not influence the diagnosis of MS according to McDonald diagnostic criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6059032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60590322018-07-26 Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study Hagens, Marloes H.J. Burggraaff, Jessica Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Vos, Marlieke L. Cawley, Niamh Sbardella, Emilia Andelova, Michaela Amann, Michael Lieb, Johanna M. Pantano, Patrizia Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Killestein, Joep Oreja-Guevara, Celia Ciccarelli, Olga Gasperini, Claudio Lukas, Carsten Wattjes, Mike P. Barkhof, Frederik Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: In the work-up of patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3T MRI might offer a higher lesion detection than 1.5T, but it remains unclear whether this affects the fulfilment of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We recruited 66 patients with CIS within 6 months from symptom onset and 26 healthy controls in 6 MS centers. All participants underwent 1.5T and 3T brain and spinal cord MRI at baseline according to local optimized protocols and the MAGNIMS guidelines. Patients who had not converted to MS during follow-up received repeat brain MRI at 3–6 months and 12–15 months. The number of lesions per anatomical region was scored by 3 raters in consensus. Criteria for dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time (DIT) were determined according to the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. RESULTS: Three-Tesla MRI detected 15% more T2 brain lesions compared to 1.5T (p < 0.001), which was driven by an increase in baseline detection of periventricular (12%, p = 0.015), (juxta)cortical (21%, p = 0.005), and deep white matter lesions (21%, p < 0.001). The detection rate of spinal cord lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions did not differ between field strengths. Three-Tesla MRI did not lead to a higher number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS or DIT, or subsequent diagnosis of MS, at any of the 3 time points. CONCLUSION: Scanning at 3T does not influence the diagnosis of MS according to McDonald diagnostic criteria. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6059032/ /pubmed/29925550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Hagens, Marloes H.J. Burggraaff, Jessica Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Vos, Marlieke L. Cawley, Niamh Sbardella, Emilia Andelova, Michaela Amann, Michael Lieb, Johanna M. Pantano, Patrizia Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Killestein, Joep Oreja-Guevara, Celia Ciccarelli, Olga Gasperini, Claudio Lukas, Carsten Wattjes, Mike P. Barkhof, Frederik Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title | Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title_full | Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title_short | Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study |
title_sort | three-tesla mri does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagensmarloeshj threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT burggraaffjessica threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT kilsdonkirisd threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT devosmarliekel threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT cawleyniamh threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT sbardellaemilia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT andelovamichaela threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT amannmichael threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT liebjohannam threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT pantanopatrizia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT lissenbergwittebirgiti threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT killesteinjoep threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT orejaguevaracelia threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT ciccarelliolga threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT gasperiniclaudio threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT lukascarsten threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT wattjesmikep threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT barkhoffrederik threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy AT threeteslamridoesnotimprovethediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisamulticenterstudy |