Cargando…

A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated breath carbon monoxide (BCO) testing in identifying maternal smokers as well as the difference between disclosers and non-disclosers of smoking status. We also investigated if other extrinsic factors affected the women’s BCO levels in pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel, Egan, Brendan, Kennedy, Rachel AK, O’Malley, Eimer G, Sheehan, Sharon R, Turner, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022089
_version_ 1783341826043805696
author Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel
Egan, Brendan
Kennedy, Rachel AK
O’Malley, Eimer G
Sheehan, Sharon R
Turner, Michael J
author_facet Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel
Egan, Brendan
Kennedy, Rachel AK
O’Malley, Eimer G
Sheehan, Sharon R
Turner, Michael J
author_sort Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated breath carbon monoxide (BCO) testing in identifying maternal smokers as well as the difference between disclosers and non-disclosers of smoking status. We also investigated if other extrinsic factors affected the women’s BCO levels in pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university obstetric hospital in an urban setting in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Women (n=250) and their partners (n=54) were recruited at their first antenatal visit. Women <18 years and those who did not understand English were excluded. A booking history, including recording of smoking status, was collected by midwives. Following this, women were recruited and completed a detailed research questionnaire on smoking and extrinsic/environmental BCO sources. A BCO test was performed on both the woman and her partner. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of self-reported smokers and those that were positive on the BCO test. The characteristics of women who disclosed and did not disclose smoking status. The effect of extrinsic factors on the BCO test results. RESULTS: Based on the receiver-operating characteristic curve, a BCO cut-off point of ≥3 ppm was the optimal level to identify ongoing smoking. At booking history, 15% of women reported as current smokers. Based on BCO levels ≥3 ppm combined with self-reported smoking in the research questionnaire, the rate increased to 25%. Non-disclosers had similar characteristics to non-smokers. No extrinsic factors affected maternal BCO levels. CONCLUSIONS: Based on self-report and BCO levels, a quarter of women presenting for antenatal care continued to smoke, but only 60% reported their smoking to midwives. BCO measurement is an inexpensive, practical method of improving identification of maternal smoking, and it was not effected by extrinsic sources of BCO. Improved identification means more smokers can be supported to stop smoking in early pregnancy potentially improving the short-term and long-term health of both mother and child.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60592622018-07-27 A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel Egan, Brendan Kennedy, Rachel AK O’Malley, Eimer G Sheehan, Sharon R Turner, Michael J BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated breath carbon monoxide (BCO) testing in identifying maternal smokers as well as the difference between disclosers and non-disclosers of smoking status. We also investigated if other extrinsic factors affected the women’s BCO levels in pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university obstetric hospital in an urban setting in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Women (n=250) and their partners (n=54) were recruited at their first antenatal visit. Women <18 years and those who did not understand English were excluded. A booking history, including recording of smoking status, was collected by midwives. Following this, women were recruited and completed a detailed research questionnaire on smoking and extrinsic/environmental BCO sources. A BCO test was performed on both the woman and her partner. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of self-reported smokers and those that were positive on the BCO test. The characteristics of women who disclosed and did not disclose smoking status. The effect of extrinsic factors on the BCO test results. RESULTS: Based on the receiver-operating characteristic curve, a BCO cut-off point of ≥3 ppm was the optimal level to identify ongoing smoking. At booking history, 15% of women reported as current smokers. Based on BCO levels ≥3 ppm combined with self-reported smoking in the research questionnaire, the rate increased to 25%. Non-disclosers had similar characteristics to non-smokers. No extrinsic factors affected maternal BCO levels. CONCLUSIONS: Based on self-report and BCO levels, a quarter of women presenting for antenatal care continued to smoke, but only 60% reported their smoking to midwives. BCO measurement is an inexpensive, practical method of improving identification of maternal smoking, and it was not effected by extrinsic sources of BCO. Improved identification means more smokers can be supported to stop smoking in early pregnancy potentially improving the short-term and long-term health of both mother and child. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6059262/ /pubmed/30037878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022089 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Reynolds, Ciara Marie Edel
Egan, Brendan
Kennedy, Rachel AK
O’Malley, Eimer G
Sheehan, Sharon R
Turner, Michael J
A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title_full A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title_fullStr A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title_short A prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in Ireland
title_sort prospective, observational study investigating the use of carbon monoxide screening to identify maternal smoking in a large university hospital in ireland
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022089
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsciaramarieedel aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT eganbrendan aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT kennedyrachelak aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT omalleyeimerg aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT sheehansharonr aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT turnermichaelj aprospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT reynoldsciaramarieedel prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT eganbrendan prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT kennedyrachelak prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT omalleyeimerg prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT sheehansharonr prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland
AT turnermichaelj prospectiveobservationalstudyinvestigatingtheuseofcarbonmonoxidescreeningtoidentifymaternalsmokinginalargeuniversityhospitalinireland