Cargando…

Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia

BACKGROUND: There is growing discussion on the impact of informal caregiving on the health status and morbidity of family carers. Evidence suggests a proportion of carers may be at risk of poor health outcomes. However, there are limited population-based studies that provide representative data on s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stacey, Anne F, Gill, Tiffany K, Price, Kay, Taylor, Anne W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020173
_version_ 1783341832051097600
author Stacey, Anne F
Gill, Tiffany K
Price, Kay
Taylor, Anne W
author_facet Stacey, Anne F
Gill, Tiffany K
Price, Kay
Taylor, Anne W
author_sort Stacey, Anne F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing discussion on the impact of informal caregiving on the health status and morbidity of family carers. Evidence suggests a proportion of carers may be at risk of poor health outcomes. However, there are limited population-based studies that provide representative data on specific risk factors among carers (eg, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking status, activity and body mass index) and major chronic conditions (eg, asthma, diabetes and arthritis). This study aimed to redress that imbalance. METHOD: Self-reported data were from the South Australian Monitoring and Surveillance System (SAMSS), a representative cross-sectional state-wide population-based survey of 600 randomly selected persons per month. SAMSS uses computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) to monitor chronic health-related problems and risk factors and to assess health outcomes. In total, 2247 family carers were identified from 35 195 participants aged 16 years and older for the 5-year period from 2010 to 2015. Logistic regression analyses examined associations of being a carer with self-reported chronic diseases and health risk factors. In addition, the population attributable risk (PAR) of being a carer was examined for selected chronic conditions. RESULTS: The prevalence of carers was 6.4%, and peak age group for carers was 50–59 years. Adjusted ORs for chronic conditions in carers were significant for all chronic conditions examined. Although there is a high prevalence of self-reported risk factors and chronic conditions among carers compared with non-carers at the population level, PAR findings suggest that caregiving is associated with a small to moderate increased risk of having these chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of carer health and morbidity particularly ‘at risk’ individuals such as female carers with asthma or diabetes remains important and provides an ongoing baseline for future surveys. To achieve this, caregiver-based studies need to become part of mainstream biomedical research at both epidemiological and clinical levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60592882018-07-27 Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia Stacey, Anne F Gill, Tiffany K Price, Kay Taylor, Anne W BMJ Open Epidemiology BACKGROUND: There is growing discussion on the impact of informal caregiving on the health status and morbidity of family carers. Evidence suggests a proportion of carers may be at risk of poor health outcomes. However, there are limited population-based studies that provide representative data on specific risk factors among carers (eg, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking status, activity and body mass index) and major chronic conditions (eg, asthma, diabetes and arthritis). This study aimed to redress that imbalance. METHOD: Self-reported data were from the South Australian Monitoring and Surveillance System (SAMSS), a representative cross-sectional state-wide population-based survey of 600 randomly selected persons per month. SAMSS uses computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) to monitor chronic health-related problems and risk factors and to assess health outcomes. In total, 2247 family carers were identified from 35 195 participants aged 16 years and older for the 5-year period from 2010 to 2015. Logistic regression analyses examined associations of being a carer with self-reported chronic diseases and health risk factors. In addition, the population attributable risk (PAR) of being a carer was examined for selected chronic conditions. RESULTS: The prevalence of carers was 6.4%, and peak age group for carers was 50–59 years. Adjusted ORs for chronic conditions in carers were significant for all chronic conditions examined. Although there is a high prevalence of self-reported risk factors and chronic conditions among carers compared with non-carers at the population level, PAR findings suggest that caregiving is associated with a small to moderate increased risk of having these chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of carer health and morbidity particularly ‘at risk’ individuals such as female carers with asthma or diabetes remains important and provides an ongoing baseline for future surveys. To achieve this, caregiver-based studies need to become part of mainstream biomedical research at both epidemiological and clinical levels. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6059288/ /pubmed/30037861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020173 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Stacey, Anne F
Gill, Tiffany K
Price, Kay
Taylor, Anne W
Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title_full Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title_fullStr Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title_full_unstemmed Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title_short Differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in South Australia
title_sort differences in risk factors and chronic conditions between informal (family) carers and non-carers using a population-based cross-sectional survey in south australia
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020173
work_keys_str_mv AT staceyannef differencesinriskfactorsandchronicconditionsbetweeninformalfamilycarersandnoncarersusingapopulationbasedcrosssectionalsurveyinsouthaustralia
AT gilltiffanyk differencesinriskfactorsandchronicconditionsbetweeninformalfamilycarersandnoncarersusingapopulationbasedcrosssectionalsurveyinsouthaustralia
AT pricekay differencesinriskfactorsandchronicconditionsbetweeninformalfamilycarersandnoncarersusingapopulationbasedcrosssectionalsurveyinsouthaustralia
AT taylorannew differencesinriskfactorsandchronicconditionsbetweeninformalfamilycarersandnoncarersusingapopulationbasedcrosssectionalsurveyinsouthaustralia