Cargando…
Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when?
OBJECTIVES: To assess self-reported chronic injuries in climbing and possible connections with gender, experience and style of climbing. METHOD: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 667 active climbers (385 with chronic injuries, 289 males and 96 females). MAIN OUTCO...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000406 |
_version_ | 1783341834160832512 |
---|---|
author | Grønhaug, Gudmund |
author_facet | Grønhaug, Gudmund |
author_sort | Grønhaug, Gudmund |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess self-reported chronic injuries in climbing and possible connections with gender, experience and style of climbing. METHOD: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 667 active climbers (385 with chronic injuries, 289 males and 96 females). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Climbers who had experienced at least one chronic injury during the last 6 months. RESULT: About 2/3 of male outdoor climbers had experienced a chronic injury. The three most frequent sites of injury were fingers (41.3%), shoulders (19.4%) and elbows (17.7%). The most frequent injury for the females were fingers (29.2%), shoulder (21.9%), wrist (12.5%), elbow (11.5%) and foot/ankle (10.4%). The most frequent injuries for the male were fingers (45.3%), elbow (19.7%) and shoulder (18.7%). Respondents who preferred outdoor climbing were more prone to injury than others. CONCLUSION: Fingers were the most prevalent site of injury regardless of level of experience, gender and whether level of expertise is reported in terms of bouldering or route climbing. There seems to be a gender difference in respect of site of injury prevalence and a different prevalence of injuries according to style of climbing and different levels of expertise. Furthermore, the use of the suggested way of reporting levels of expertise to compare between bouldering and route climbing seems to be robust with no huge differences in terms of incidence level of different injuries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6059297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60592972018-07-27 Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? Grønhaug, Gudmund BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess self-reported chronic injuries in climbing and possible connections with gender, experience and style of climbing. METHOD: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 667 active climbers (385 with chronic injuries, 289 males and 96 females). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Climbers who had experienced at least one chronic injury during the last 6 months. RESULT: About 2/3 of male outdoor climbers had experienced a chronic injury. The three most frequent sites of injury were fingers (41.3%), shoulders (19.4%) and elbows (17.7%). The most frequent injury for the females were fingers (29.2%), shoulder (21.9%), wrist (12.5%), elbow (11.5%) and foot/ankle (10.4%). The most frequent injuries for the male were fingers (45.3%), elbow (19.7%) and shoulder (18.7%). Respondents who preferred outdoor climbing were more prone to injury than others. CONCLUSION: Fingers were the most prevalent site of injury regardless of level of experience, gender and whether level of expertise is reported in terms of bouldering or route climbing. There seems to be a gender difference in respect of site of injury prevalence and a different prevalence of injuries according to style of climbing and different levels of expertise. Furthermore, the use of the suggested way of reporting levels of expertise to compare between bouldering and route climbing seems to be robust with no huge differences in terms of incidence level of different injuries. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6059297/ /pubmed/30057779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000406 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Grønhaug, Gudmund Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title | Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title_full | Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title_fullStr | Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title_short | Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
title_sort | self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: who gets injured when? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000406 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grønhauggudmund selfreportedchronicinjuriesinclimbingwhogetsinjuredwhen |