Cargando…
Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Using specific tools to assess the measurement properties of health status instruments is recommended both to standardise the review process and to improve the methodological quality of systematic reviews. However, depending on the measurement standards on which these tools are develop...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022829 |
_version_ | 1783341835105599488 |
---|---|
author | Lorente, Sonia Vives, Jaume Viladrich, Carme Losilla, Josep-Maria |
author_facet | Lorente, Sonia Vives, Jaume Viladrich, Carme Losilla, Josep-Maria |
author_sort | Lorente, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Using specific tools to assess the measurement properties of health status instruments is recommended both to standardise the review process and to improve the methodological quality of systematic reviews. However, depending on the measurement standards on which these tools are developed, the approach to appraise the measurement properties of instruments may vary. For this reason, the present meta-review aims to: (1) identify systematic reviews assessing the measurement properties of instruments evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL); (2) identify the tools applied to assess the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments; (3) describe the characteristics of the tools applied to assess the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments; (4) identify the measurement standards on which these tools were developed or conform to and (5) compare the similarities and differences among the identified measurement standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. Electronic search will be carried out on bibliographic databases, including PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Psychological Information, SCOPUS, Web of Science, COSMIN database and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, being limited by time (2008–2018) and language (English). Descriptive analyses of different aspects of tools applied to evaluate the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments will be presented; the different measurement standards will be described and some recommendations about the methodological and research applications will be made. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by its publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065232 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6059301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60593012018-07-27 Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol Lorente, Sonia Vives, Jaume Viladrich, Carme Losilla, Josep-Maria BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Using specific tools to assess the measurement properties of health status instruments is recommended both to standardise the review process and to improve the methodological quality of systematic reviews. However, depending on the measurement standards on which these tools are developed, the approach to appraise the measurement properties of instruments may vary. For this reason, the present meta-review aims to: (1) identify systematic reviews assessing the measurement properties of instruments evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL); (2) identify the tools applied to assess the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments; (3) describe the characteristics of the tools applied to assess the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments; (4) identify the measurement standards on which these tools were developed or conform to and (5) compare the similarities and differences among the identified measurement standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. Electronic search will be carried out on bibliographic databases, including PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Psychological Information, SCOPUS, Web of Science, COSMIN database and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, being limited by time (2008–2018) and language (English). Descriptive analyses of different aspects of tools applied to evaluate the measurement properties of HRQoL instruments will be presented; the different measurement standards will be described and some recommendations about the methodological and research applications will be made. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by its publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065232 BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6059301/ /pubmed/30037880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022829 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Lorente, Sonia Vives, Jaume Viladrich, Carme Losilla, Josep-Maria Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title | Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title_full | Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title_fullStr | Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title_short | Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
title_sort | tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorentesonia toolstoassessthemeasurementpropertiesofqualityoflifeinstrumentsametareviewprotocol AT vivesjaume toolstoassessthemeasurementpropertiesofqualityoflifeinstrumentsametareviewprotocol AT viladrichcarme toolstoassessthemeasurementpropertiesofqualityoflifeinstrumentsametareviewprotocol AT losillajosepmaria toolstoassessthemeasurementpropertiesofqualityoflifeinstrumentsametareviewprotocol |