Cargando…

Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives

OBJECTIVES: Value-based healthcare implies that healthcare issues are addressed most effectively with the ‘physicians in the lead’ (PIL) strategy. This study explores whether PIL also supports a holistic care approach that patients are increasingly demanding. DESIGN: A qualitative research design wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Romana Fattimah, Hilders, Carina G J M, Scheele, Fedde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020739
_version_ 1783341838514520064
author Malik, Romana Fattimah
Hilders, Carina G J M
Scheele, Fedde
author_facet Malik, Romana Fattimah
Hilders, Carina G J M
Scheele, Fedde
author_sort Malik, Romana Fattimah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Value-based healthcare implies that healthcare issues are addressed most effectively with the ‘physicians in the lead’ (PIL) strategy. This study explores whether PIL also supports a holistic care approach that patients are increasingly demanding. DESIGN: A qualitative research design was used. SETTING: This study was conducted in a general hospital in the Netherlands with an integrated PIL strategy. PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 hospital stakeholders: 13 stakeholders of an Obstetrics and Gynaecology department (the hospital’s Patient Council (n=1), nurses (n=2), midwives (n=2), physicians (n=2), residents (n=2), the non-medical business managers of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department (n=2) the Board of Directors (n=2)) and a member of the Dutch National Healthcare Institute’s Innovative Healthcare Professions programme. RESULTS: According to diverse stakeholders, PIL does not support a holistic healthcare delivery approach, primarily because of the strong biomedical focus of the physicians. Although physicians can be educated to place more emphasis on the holistic outcome, holistic care delivery requires greater integration and teamwork in the care chain. As different healthcare professions are complementary to each other, a new strategy of a ‘team in the lead’ was suggested to meet the holistic healthcare demands. Besides this new strategy, there is a need for an extramural care management coordination centre where patients are able to receive support in managing their own care. This centre should also facilitate services similar to the core function of a church or community centre. These services should help patients to deal with different holistic dimensions that are important for their well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The PIL strategy appears to be insufficient for holistic healthcare delivery. A ‘team in the lead’ approach should be considered to meet the holistic healthcare demands. Further research should focus on observing PIL in different cultures and exploring the effectiveness of the strategy ‘team in the lead’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60593162018-07-27 Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives Malik, Romana Fattimah Hilders, Carina G J M Scheele, Fedde BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: Value-based healthcare implies that healthcare issues are addressed most effectively with the ‘physicians in the lead’ (PIL) strategy. This study explores whether PIL also supports a holistic care approach that patients are increasingly demanding. DESIGN: A qualitative research design was used. SETTING: This study was conducted in a general hospital in the Netherlands with an integrated PIL strategy. PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 hospital stakeholders: 13 stakeholders of an Obstetrics and Gynaecology department (the hospital’s Patient Council (n=1), nurses (n=2), midwives (n=2), physicians (n=2), residents (n=2), the non-medical business managers of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department (n=2) the Board of Directors (n=2)) and a member of the Dutch National Healthcare Institute’s Innovative Healthcare Professions programme. RESULTS: According to diverse stakeholders, PIL does not support a holistic healthcare delivery approach, primarily because of the strong biomedical focus of the physicians. Although physicians can be educated to place more emphasis on the holistic outcome, holistic care delivery requires greater integration and teamwork in the care chain. As different healthcare professions are complementary to each other, a new strategy of a ‘team in the lead’ was suggested to meet the holistic healthcare demands. Besides this new strategy, there is a need for an extramural care management coordination centre where patients are able to receive support in managing their own care. This centre should also facilitate services similar to the core function of a church or community centre. These services should help patients to deal with different holistic dimensions that are important for their well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The PIL strategy appears to be insufficient for holistic healthcare delivery. A ‘team in the lead’ approach should be considered to meet the holistic healthcare demands. Further research should focus on observing PIL in different cultures and exploring the effectiveness of the strategy ‘team in the lead’. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6059316/ /pubmed/30030313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020739 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Malik, Romana Fattimah
Hilders, Carina G J M
Scheele, Fedde
Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title_full Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title_fullStr Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title_short Do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? A qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
title_sort do ‘physicians in the lead’ support a holistic healthcare delivery approach? a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020739
work_keys_str_mv AT malikromanafattimah dophysiciansintheleadsupportaholistichealthcaredeliveryapproachaqualitativeanalysisofstakeholdersperspectives
AT hilderscarinagjm dophysiciansintheleadsupportaholistichealthcaredeliveryapproachaqualitativeanalysisofstakeholdersperspectives
AT scheelefedde dophysiciansintheleadsupportaholistichealthcaredeliveryapproachaqualitativeanalysisofstakeholdersperspectives