Cargando…

Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital

BACKGROUND: Acute haemolytic transfusion reactions due to ABO incompatible blood transfusion remain a leading cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality in the USA. Erroneous patient identification and specimen labelling account for many errors that lead to ABO mistransfusions; these er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glisch, Chad, Jawa, Zeeshan, Brener, Alina, Carpenter, Erica, Gottschall, Jerome, Treml, Angela, Karafin, Matthew Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000270
_version_ 1783341838976942080
author Glisch, Chad
Jawa, Zeeshan
Brener, Alina
Carpenter, Erica
Gottschall, Jerome
Treml, Angela
Karafin, Matthew Scott
author_facet Glisch, Chad
Jawa, Zeeshan
Brener, Alina
Carpenter, Erica
Gottschall, Jerome
Treml, Angela
Karafin, Matthew Scott
author_sort Glisch, Chad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute haemolytic transfusion reactions due to ABO incompatible blood transfusion remain a leading cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality in the USA. Erroneous patient identification and specimen labelling account for many errors that lead to ABO mistransfusions; these errors are largely preventable. METHODS: Our hospital requires a two-sample process of ABO/Rh typing prior to transfusion. Both samples must be drawn independently. To prevent simultaneous sample draw, our second sample tube has a unique pink top that is only available from the blood bank and can only be sent to the patient’s floor once the first sample arrives in the lab. We performed an audit of this process from 19 March to 30 July 2014 and 19 March to 30 July 2015. RESULTS: We reviewed type and crossmatch orders for 2702 new patients during the audit period and 824 patients (30.5%) required transfusion. All patients evaluated received compatible blood, and no mistransfusions were recorded using this method. Three per cent of testing was performed incorrectly, which safely defaulted to giving type O blood. CONCLUSIONS: The two-sample protocol used by our institution can decrease the risk of mistransfusion. Our protocol was relatively inexpensive, safe, efficient and practical for adaptation by other hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60593182018-07-27 Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital Glisch, Chad Jawa, Zeeshan Brener, Alina Carpenter, Erica Gottschall, Jerome Treml, Angela Karafin, Matthew Scott BMJ Open Qual Original Article BACKGROUND: Acute haemolytic transfusion reactions due to ABO incompatible blood transfusion remain a leading cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality in the USA. Erroneous patient identification and specimen labelling account for many errors that lead to ABO mistransfusions; these errors are largely preventable. METHODS: Our hospital requires a two-sample process of ABO/Rh typing prior to transfusion. Both samples must be drawn independently. To prevent simultaneous sample draw, our second sample tube has a unique pink top that is only available from the blood bank and can only be sent to the patient’s floor once the first sample arrives in the lab. We performed an audit of this process from 19 March to 30 July 2014 and 19 March to 30 July 2015. RESULTS: We reviewed type and crossmatch orders for 2702 new patients during the audit period and 824 patients (30.5%) required transfusion. All patients evaluated received compatible blood, and no mistransfusions were recorded using this method. Three per cent of testing was performed incorrectly, which safely defaulted to giving type O blood. CONCLUSIONS: The two-sample protocol used by our institution can decrease the risk of mistransfusion. Our protocol was relatively inexpensive, safe, efficient and practical for adaptation by other hospitals. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6059318/ /pubmed/30057954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000270 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Glisch, Chad
Jawa, Zeeshan
Brener, Alina
Carpenter, Erica
Gottschall, Jerome
Treml, Angela
Karafin, Matthew Scott
Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title_full Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title_short Evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of ABO mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
title_sort evaluation of a two-sample process for prevention of abo mistransfusions in a high volume academic hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000270
work_keys_str_mv AT glischchad evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT jawazeeshan evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT breneralina evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT carpentererica evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT gottschalljerome evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT tremlangela evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital
AT karafinmatthewscott evaluationofatwosampleprocessforpreventionofabomistransfusionsinahighvolumeacademichospital