Cargando…

Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment

Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galanos, Kelly, Jaeger, Cassie, Coakley, Kevin, White, Peter, Griffen, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279
_version_ 1783341840183853056
author Galanos, Kelly
Jaeger, Cassie
Coakley, Kevin
White, Peter
Griffen, David
author_facet Galanos, Kelly
Jaeger, Cassie
Coakley, Kevin
White, Peter
Griffen, David
author_sort Galanos, Kelly
collection PubMed
description Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the approach to patients with SMPE and to evaluate the effect of the protocol on process measures including consultation with cardiology and critical care physicians and time to echocardiogram and treatment. Triggered by right ventricle/left ventricle ratios >0.9, the protocol standardised ancillary studies and immediate consultation with critical care and cardiology. Post-protocol implementation, the percent of patients with SMPE evaluated by critical care specialists increased from 26% (19/74) to 93% (41/44) (p<0.001) and cardiology consultations increased from 35% (26/74) to 89% (39/44) (p<0.001). Patient arrival to echocardiogram was reduced from 15 hours to 5 hours post-protocol implementation. In addition, average time to anticoagulation was reduced from greater than 7 hours to 3 hours 27 min post-protocol implementation. The protocol has helped to identify patients with SMPE and standardise the care they receive after diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60593232018-07-27 Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment Galanos, Kelly Jaeger, Cassie Coakley, Kevin White, Peter Griffen, David BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the approach to patients with SMPE and to evaluate the effect of the protocol on process measures including consultation with cardiology and critical care physicians and time to echocardiogram and treatment. Triggered by right ventricle/left ventricle ratios >0.9, the protocol standardised ancillary studies and immediate consultation with critical care and cardiology. Post-protocol implementation, the percent of patients with SMPE evaluated by critical care specialists increased from 26% (19/74) to 93% (41/44) (p<0.001) and cardiology consultations increased from 35% (26/74) to 89% (39/44) (p<0.001). Patient arrival to echocardiogram was reduced from 15 hours to 5 hours post-protocol implementation. In addition, average time to anticoagulation was reduced from greater than 7 hours to 3 hours 27 min post-protocol implementation. The protocol has helped to identify patients with SMPE and standardise the care they receive after diagnosis. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6059323/ /pubmed/30057955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement report
Galanos, Kelly
Jaeger, Cassie
Coakley, Kevin
White, Peter
Griffen, David
Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title_full Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title_short Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
title_sort effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
topic BMJ Quality Improvement report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279
work_keys_str_mv AT galanoskelly effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment
AT jaegercassie effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment
AT coakleykevin effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment
AT whitepeter effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment
AT griffendavid effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment