Cargando…
Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment
Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279 |
_version_ | 1783341840183853056 |
---|---|
author | Galanos, Kelly Jaeger, Cassie Coakley, Kevin White, Peter Griffen, David |
author_facet | Galanos, Kelly Jaeger, Cassie Coakley, Kevin White, Peter Griffen, David |
author_sort | Galanos, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the approach to patients with SMPE and to evaluate the effect of the protocol on process measures including consultation with cardiology and critical care physicians and time to echocardiogram and treatment. Triggered by right ventricle/left ventricle ratios >0.9, the protocol standardised ancillary studies and immediate consultation with critical care and cardiology. Post-protocol implementation, the percent of patients with SMPE evaluated by critical care specialists increased from 26% (19/74) to 93% (41/44) (p<0.001) and cardiology consultations increased from 35% (26/74) to 89% (39/44) (p<0.001). Patient arrival to echocardiogram was reduced from 15 hours to 5 hours post-protocol implementation. In addition, average time to anticoagulation was reduced from greater than 7 hours to 3 hours 27 min post-protocol implementation. The protocol has helped to identify patients with SMPE and standardise the care they receive after diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6059323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60593232018-07-27 Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment Galanos, Kelly Jaeger, Cassie Coakley, Kevin White, Peter Griffen, David BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Treatment recommendations for submassive pulmonary embolus (SMPE), defined as pulmonary embolus (PE) resulting in right ventricular dysfunction and/or myocardial necrosis, vary. The objective of this study was to develop an investigative protocol at our tertiary care hospital to standardise the approach to patients with SMPE and to evaluate the effect of the protocol on process measures including consultation with cardiology and critical care physicians and time to echocardiogram and treatment. Triggered by right ventricle/left ventricle ratios >0.9, the protocol standardised ancillary studies and immediate consultation with critical care and cardiology. Post-protocol implementation, the percent of patients with SMPE evaluated by critical care specialists increased from 26% (19/74) to 93% (41/44) (p<0.001) and cardiology consultations increased from 35% (26/74) to 89% (39/44) (p<0.001). Patient arrival to echocardiogram was reduced from 15 hours to 5 hours post-protocol implementation. In addition, average time to anticoagulation was reduced from greater than 7 hours to 3 hours 27 min post-protocol implementation. The protocol has helped to identify patients with SMPE and standardise the care they receive after diagnosis. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6059323/ /pubmed/30057955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement report Galanos, Kelly Jaeger, Cassie Coakley, Kevin White, Peter Griffen, David Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title | Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title_full | Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title_short | Effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
title_sort | effectiveness of a submassive pulmonary embolism protocol to standardise patient evaluation and treatment |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galanoskelly effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment AT jaegercassie effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment AT coakleykevin effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment AT whitepeter effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment AT griffendavid effectivenessofasubmassivepulmonaryembolismprotocoltostandardisepatientevaluationandtreatment |