Cargando…

Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening

High throughput screening (HTS) projects like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program are required to address the large and rapidly increasing number of chemicals for which we have little to no toxicity measurements. Concentration-response parameters such as potency and effic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watt, Eric D., Judson, Richard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196963
_version_ 1783341852691267584
author Watt, Eric D.
Judson, Richard S.
author_facet Watt, Eric D.
Judson, Richard S.
author_sort Watt, Eric D.
collection PubMed
description High throughput screening (HTS) projects like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program are required to address the large and rapidly increasing number of chemicals for which we have little to no toxicity measurements. Concentration-response parameters such as potency and efficacy are extracted from HTS data using nonlinear regression, and models and analyses built from these parameters are used to predict in vivo and in vitro toxicity of thousands of chemicals. How these predictions are impacted by uncertainties that stem from parameter estimation and propagated through the models and analyses has not been well explored. While data size and complexity makes uncertainty quantification computationally expensive for HTS datasets, continued advancements in computational resources have allowed these computational challenges to be met. This study uses nonparametric bootstrap resampling to calculate uncertainties in concentration-response parameters from a variety of HTS assays. Using the ToxCast estrogen receptor model for bioactivity as a case study, we highlight how these uncertainties can be propagated through models to quantify the uncertainty in model outputs. Uncertainty quantification in model outputs is used to identify potential false positives and false negatives and to determine the distribution of model values around semi-arbitrary activity cutoffs, increasing confidence in model predictions. At the individual chemical-assay level, curves with high variability are flagged for manual inspection or retesting, focusing subject-matter-expert time on results that need further input. This work improves the confidence of predictions made using HTS data, increasing the ability to use this data in risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6059398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60593982018-08-06 Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening Watt, Eric D. Judson, Richard S. PLoS One Research Article High throughput screening (HTS) projects like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program are required to address the large and rapidly increasing number of chemicals for which we have little to no toxicity measurements. Concentration-response parameters such as potency and efficacy are extracted from HTS data using nonlinear regression, and models and analyses built from these parameters are used to predict in vivo and in vitro toxicity of thousands of chemicals. How these predictions are impacted by uncertainties that stem from parameter estimation and propagated through the models and analyses has not been well explored. While data size and complexity makes uncertainty quantification computationally expensive for HTS datasets, continued advancements in computational resources have allowed these computational challenges to be met. This study uses nonparametric bootstrap resampling to calculate uncertainties in concentration-response parameters from a variety of HTS assays. Using the ToxCast estrogen receptor model for bioactivity as a case study, we highlight how these uncertainties can be propagated through models to quantify the uncertainty in model outputs. Uncertainty quantification in model outputs is used to identify potential false positives and false negatives and to determine the distribution of model values around semi-arbitrary activity cutoffs, increasing confidence in model predictions. At the individual chemical-assay level, curves with high variability are flagged for manual inspection or retesting, focusing subject-matter-expert time on results that need further input. This work improves the confidence of predictions made using HTS data, increasing the ability to use this data in risk assessment. Public Library of Science 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6059398/ /pubmed/30044784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196963 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Watt, Eric D.
Judson, Richard S.
Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title_full Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title_fullStr Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title_short Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening
title_sort uncertainty quantification in toxcast high throughput screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196963
work_keys_str_mv AT wattericd uncertaintyquantificationintoxcasthighthroughputscreening
AT judsonrichards uncertaintyquantificationintoxcasthighthroughputscreening