Cargando…
The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7 |
_version_ | 1783342042938605568 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Jennifer G. Macrae, Finlay Winship, Ingrid Oberoi, Jasmeen Saya, Sibel Milton, Shakira Bickerstaffe, Adrian Dowty, James G. De Abreu Lourenço, Richard Clark, Malcolm Galloway, Louise Fishman, George Walter, Fiona M. Flander, Louisa Chondros, Patty Ait Ouakrim, Driss Pirotta, Marie Trevena, Lyndal Jenkins, Mark A. Emery, Jon D. |
author_facet | Walker, Jennifer G. Macrae, Finlay Winship, Ingrid Oberoi, Jasmeen Saya, Sibel Milton, Shakira Bickerstaffe, Adrian Dowty, James G. De Abreu Lourenço, Richard Clark, Malcolm Galloway, Louise Fishman, George Walter, Fiona M. Flander, Louisa Chondros, Patty Ait Ouakrim, Driss Pirotta, Marie Trevena, Lyndal Jenkins, Mark A. Emery, Jon D. |
author_sort | Walker, Jennifer G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care. METHODS: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual’s absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p. Registered on 14 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60604962018-07-31 The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Walker, Jennifer G. Macrae, Finlay Winship, Ingrid Oberoi, Jasmeen Saya, Sibel Milton, Shakira Bickerstaffe, Adrian Dowty, James G. De Abreu Lourenço, Richard Clark, Malcolm Galloway, Louise Fishman, George Walter, Fiona M. Flander, Louisa Chondros, Patty Ait Ouakrim, Driss Pirotta, Marie Trevena, Lyndal Jenkins, Mark A. Emery, Jon D. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care. METHODS: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual’s absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p. Registered on 14 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6060496/ /pubmed/30045764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Walker, Jennifer G. Macrae, Finlay Winship, Ingrid Oberoi, Jasmeen Saya, Sibel Milton, Shakira Bickerstaffe, Adrian Dowty, James G. De Abreu Lourenço, Richard Clark, Malcolm Galloway, Louise Fishman, George Walter, Fiona M. Flander, Louisa Chondros, Patty Ait Ouakrim, Driss Pirotta, Marie Trevena, Lyndal Jenkins, Mark A. Emery, Jon D. The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (crisp) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerjenniferg theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macraefinlay theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT winshipingrid theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oberoijasmeen theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sayasibel theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT miltonshakira theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bickerstaffeadrian theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dowtyjamesg theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT deabreulourencorichard theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarkmalcolm theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gallowaylouise theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fishmangeorge theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walterfionam theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT flanderlouisa theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chondrospatty theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aitouakrimdriss theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pirottamarie theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trevenalyndal theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jenkinsmarka theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT emeryjond theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkerjenniferg useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macraefinlay useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT winshipingrid useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oberoijasmeen useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sayasibel useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT miltonshakira useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bickerstaffeadrian useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dowtyjamesg useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT deabreulourencorichard useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarkmalcolm useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gallowaylouise useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fishmangeorge useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walterfionam useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT flanderlouisa useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chondrospatty useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aitouakrimdriss useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pirottamarie useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trevenalyndal useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jenkinsmarka useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT emeryjond useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |