Cargando…

The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Jennifer G., Macrae, Finlay, Winship, Ingrid, Oberoi, Jasmeen, Saya, Sibel, Milton, Shakira, Bickerstaffe, Adrian, Dowty, James G., De Abreu Lourenço, Richard, Clark, Malcolm, Galloway, Louise, Fishman, George, Walter, Fiona M., Flander, Louisa, Chondros, Patty, Ait Ouakrim, Driss, Pirotta, Marie, Trevena, Lyndal, Jenkins, Mark A., Emery, Jon D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7
_version_ 1783342042938605568
author Walker, Jennifer G.
Macrae, Finlay
Winship, Ingrid
Oberoi, Jasmeen
Saya, Sibel
Milton, Shakira
Bickerstaffe, Adrian
Dowty, James G.
De Abreu Lourenço, Richard
Clark, Malcolm
Galloway, Louise
Fishman, George
Walter, Fiona M.
Flander, Louisa
Chondros, Patty
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Pirotta, Marie
Trevena, Lyndal
Jenkins, Mark A.
Emery, Jon D.
author_facet Walker, Jennifer G.
Macrae, Finlay
Winship, Ingrid
Oberoi, Jasmeen
Saya, Sibel
Milton, Shakira
Bickerstaffe, Adrian
Dowty, James G.
De Abreu Lourenço, Richard
Clark, Malcolm
Galloway, Louise
Fishman, George
Walter, Fiona M.
Flander, Louisa
Chondros, Patty
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Pirotta, Marie
Trevena, Lyndal
Jenkins, Mark A.
Emery, Jon D.
author_sort Walker, Jennifer G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care. METHODS: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual’s absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p. Registered on 14 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60604962018-07-31 The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Walker, Jennifer G. Macrae, Finlay Winship, Ingrid Oberoi, Jasmeen Saya, Sibel Milton, Shakira Bickerstaffe, Adrian Dowty, James G. De Abreu Lourenço, Richard Clark, Malcolm Galloway, Louise Fishman, George Walter, Fiona M. Flander, Louisa Chondros, Patty Ait Ouakrim, Driss Pirotta, Marie Trevena, Lyndal Jenkins, Mark A. Emery, Jon D. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care. METHODS: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual’s absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p. Registered on 14 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6060496/ /pubmed/30045764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Walker, Jennifer G.
Macrae, Finlay
Winship, Ingrid
Oberoi, Jasmeen
Saya, Sibel
Milton, Shakira
Bickerstaffe, Adrian
Dowty, James G.
De Abreu Lourenço, Richard
Clark, Malcolm
Galloway, Louise
Fishman, George
Walter, Fiona M.
Flander, Louisa
Chondros, Patty
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Pirotta, Marie
Trevena, Lyndal
Jenkins, Mark A.
Emery, Jon D.
The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (crisp) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerjenniferg theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macraefinlay theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winshipingrid theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oberoijasmeen theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sayasibel theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT miltonshakira theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bickerstaffeadrian theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dowtyjamesg theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deabreulourencorichard theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkmalcolm theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gallowaylouise theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fishmangeorge theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walterfionam theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT flanderlouisa theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chondrospatty theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aitouakrimdriss theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pirottamarie theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trevenalyndal theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jenkinsmarka theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emeryjond theuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkerjenniferg useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macraefinlay useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winshipingrid useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oberoijasmeen useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sayasibel useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT miltonshakira useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bickerstaffeadrian useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dowtyjamesg useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deabreulourencorichard useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkmalcolm useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gallowaylouise useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fishmangeorge useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walterfionam useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT flanderlouisa useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chondrospatty useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aitouakrimdriss useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pirottamarie useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trevenalyndal useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jenkinsmarka useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emeryjond useofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttoolcrispcomparedwithusualcareingeneralpracticetoincreaseriskstratifiedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial