Cargando…
Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma
CONTEXT: New Gleason Score of Prostate. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assign the patients with carcinoma prostate into new prognostic grade groups (PGGs) based on revised Gleason score (GS) and follow-up according to the WHO 2016. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the biopsies/resected specimens of carc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_185_17 |
_version_ | 1783342067797196800 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Vishal Garudadri, Gowri Shilpa, Arya Sahithi Fonseca, Daphne Sudha, S. Murthy Sharma, Rakesh Subramanyeshwar, T. Rao Challa, Sundaram |
author_facet | Rao, Vishal Garudadri, Gowri Shilpa, Arya Sahithi Fonseca, Daphne Sudha, S. Murthy Sharma, Rakesh Subramanyeshwar, T. Rao Challa, Sundaram |
author_sort | Rao, Vishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: New Gleason Score of Prostate. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assign the patients with carcinoma prostate into new prognostic grade groups (PGGs) based on revised Gleason score (GS) and follow-up according to the WHO 2016. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the biopsies/resected specimens of carcinoma prostate from January 2014 to June 2016 were reviewed, and GS was done according to the WHO 2016. Accordingly, cribriform, fused, and glomeruloid glands were assigned GS 4. Thus, two groups were identified with GS 7 (3 + 4 and 4 + 3). The patients were grouped into PGGs 1–5. The number of patients with change in the prognostic group along with follow-up was calculated. RESULTS: There were 143 patients with carcinoma prostate, with a median age of 65 years. The initial GS was revised, and there was a decrease in GS 3 + 4 from 13.9% to 9% and increase in 4 + 3 from 19.6% to 23.8%. There was upgradation of PGG in 11 (7.69%) biopsies; with PGG from 1 to 2 in one; 2to 3 in eight; and 3to 4 in two. Follow-up at 2 years in 22 showed the poor prognoses in the patients who were upgraded to the higher prognostic group. CONCLUSIONS: A change in PGG according to the WHO 2016 criteria was assigned in 7.69% biopsies of carcinoma prostate, and it correlated with prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60606002018-08-08 Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma Rao, Vishal Garudadri, Gowri Shilpa, Arya Sahithi Fonseca, Daphne Sudha, S. Murthy Sharma, Rakesh Subramanyeshwar, T. Rao Challa, Sundaram Urol Ann Original Article CONTEXT: New Gleason Score of Prostate. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assign the patients with carcinoma prostate into new prognostic grade groups (PGGs) based on revised Gleason score (GS) and follow-up according to the WHO 2016. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the biopsies/resected specimens of carcinoma prostate from January 2014 to June 2016 were reviewed, and GS was done according to the WHO 2016. Accordingly, cribriform, fused, and glomeruloid glands were assigned GS 4. Thus, two groups were identified with GS 7 (3 + 4 and 4 + 3). The patients were grouped into PGGs 1–5. The number of patients with change in the prognostic group along with follow-up was calculated. RESULTS: There were 143 patients with carcinoma prostate, with a median age of 65 years. The initial GS was revised, and there was a decrease in GS 3 + 4 from 13.9% to 9% and increase in 4 + 3 from 19.6% to 23.8%. There was upgradation of PGG in 11 (7.69%) biopsies; with PGG from 1 to 2 in one; 2to 3 in eight; and 3to 4 in two. Follow-up at 2 years in 22 showed the poor prognoses in the patients who were upgraded to the higher prognostic group. CONCLUSIONS: A change in PGG according to the WHO 2016 criteria was assigned in 7.69% biopsies of carcinoma prostate, and it correlated with prognosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060600/ /pubmed/30089994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_185_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rao, Vishal Garudadri, Gowri Shilpa, Arya Sahithi Fonseca, Daphne Sudha, S. Murthy Sharma, Rakesh Subramanyeshwar, T. Rao Challa, Sundaram Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title | Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title_full | Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title_short | Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
title_sort | validation of the who 2016 new gleason score of prostatic carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_185_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raovishal validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT garudadrigowri validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT shilpaaryasahithi validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT fonsecadaphne validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT sudhasmurthy validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT sharmarakesh validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT subramanyeshwartrao validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma AT challasundaram validationofthewho2016newgleasonscoreofprostaticcarcinoma |