Cargando…
Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery
BACKGROUND: Leaks from the upper gastrointestinal tract often pose a management challenge, particularly when surgical treatment has failed or is impossible. Vacuum therapy has revolutionised the treatment of wounds, and its role in enabling and accelerating healing is now explored in oesophagogastri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29372375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4463-7 |
_version_ | 1783342085742526464 |
---|---|
author | Pournaras, D. J. Hardwick, R. H. Safranek, P. M. Sujendran, V. Bennett, J. Macaulay, G. D. Hindmarsh, A. |
author_facet | Pournaras, D. J. Hardwick, R. H. Safranek, P. M. Sujendran, V. Bennett, J. Macaulay, G. D. Hindmarsh, A. |
author_sort | Pournaras, D. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Leaks from the upper gastrointestinal tract often pose a management challenge, particularly when surgical treatment has failed or is impossible. Vacuum therapy has revolutionised the treatment of wounds, and its role in enabling and accelerating healing is now explored in oesophagogastric surgery. METHODS: A piece of open cell foam is sutured around the distal end of a nasogastric tube using a silk suture. Under general anaesthetic, the foam covered tip is placed endoscopically through the perforation and into any extra-luminal cavity. Continuous negative pressure (125 mmHg) is then applied. Re-evaluation with change of the negative pressure system is performed every 48–72 h depending on the clinical condition. Patients are fed enterally and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and anti-fungal medication until healing, assessed endoscopically and/or radiologically, is complete. RESULTS: Since April 2011, twenty one patients have been treated. The cause of the leak was postoperative/iatrogenic complications (14 patients) and ischaemic/spontaneous perforation (seven patients). Twenty patients (95%) completed treatment successfully with healing of the defect and/or resolution of the cavity and were subsequently discharged from our care. One patient died from sepsis related to an oesophageal leak after withdrawing consent for further intervention following a single endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) treatment. In addition, two patients who were successfully treated with E-Vac for their leak subsequently died within 90 days of E-Vac treatment from complications that were not associated with the E-Vac procedure. In two patients, E-Vac treatment was complicated by bleeding. The median number of E-Vac changes was 7 (range 3–12), and the median length of hospital stay was 35 days (range 23–152). CONCLUSIONS: E-Vac therapy is a safe and effective treatment for upper gastrointestinal leaks and should be considered alongside more established therapies. Further research is now needed to understand the mechanism of action and to improve the ease with which E-Vac therapy can be delivered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60607862018-08-09 Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery Pournaras, D. J. Hardwick, R. H. Safranek, P. M. Sujendran, V. Bennett, J. Macaulay, G. D. Hindmarsh, A. World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: Leaks from the upper gastrointestinal tract often pose a management challenge, particularly when surgical treatment has failed or is impossible. Vacuum therapy has revolutionised the treatment of wounds, and its role in enabling and accelerating healing is now explored in oesophagogastric surgery. METHODS: A piece of open cell foam is sutured around the distal end of a nasogastric tube using a silk suture. Under general anaesthetic, the foam covered tip is placed endoscopically through the perforation and into any extra-luminal cavity. Continuous negative pressure (125 mmHg) is then applied. Re-evaluation with change of the negative pressure system is performed every 48–72 h depending on the clinical condition. Patients are fed enterally and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and anti-fungal medication until healing, assessed endoscopically and/or radiologically, is complete. RESULTS: Since April 2011, twenty one patients have been treated. The cause of the leak was postoperative/iatrogenic complications (14 patients) and ischaemic/spontaneous perforation (seven patients). Twenty patients (95%) completed treatment successfully with healing of the defect and/or resolution of the cavity and were subsequently discharged from our care. One patient died from sepsis related to an oesophageal leak after withdrawing consent for further intervention following a single endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) treatment. In addition, two patients who were successfully treated with E-Vac for their leak subsequently died within 90 days of E-Vac treatment from complications that were not associated with the E-Vac procedure. In two patients, E-Vac treatment was complicated by bleeding. The median number of E-Vac changes was 7 (range 3–12), and the median length of hospital stay was 35 days (range 23–152). CONCLUSIONS: E-Vac therapy is a safe and effective treatment for upper gastrointestinal leaks and should be considered alongside more established therapies. Further research is now needed to understand the mechanism of action and to improve the ease with which E-Vac therapy can be delivered. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060786/ /pubmed/29372375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4463-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Report Pournaras, D. J. Hardwick, R. H. Safranek, P. M. Sujendran, V. Bennett, J. Macaulay, G. D. Hindmarsh, A. Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title | Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title_full | Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title_fullStr | Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title_short | Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery |
title_sort | endoluminal vacuum therapy (e-vac): a treatment option in oesophagogastric surgery |
topic | Original Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29372375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4463-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pournarasdj endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT hardwickrh endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT safranekpm endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT sujendranv endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT bennettj endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT macaulaygd endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery AT hindmarsha endoluminalvacuumtherapyevacatreatmentoptioninoesophagogastricsurgery |