Cargando…

Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is still the main treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and R0 excision, regardless of surgical margins, is considered sufficient. METHODS: A cohort of 79 consecutive GIST cases treated at the Karolinska University Hospital, who were without metastasis a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Åhlén, Jan, Karlsson, Fredrik, Wejde, Johan, Nilsson, Inga-Lena, Larsson, Catharina, Bränström, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4498-9
_version_ 1783342086431440896
author Åhlén, Jan
Karlsson, Fredrik
Wejde, Johan
Nilsson, Inga-Lena
Larsson, Catharina
Bränström, Robert
author_facet Åhlén, Jan
Karlsson, Fredrik
Wejde, Johan
Nilsson, Inga-Lena
Larsson, Catharina
Bränström, Robert
author_sort Åhlén, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is still the main treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and R0 excision, regardless of surgical margins, is considered sufficient. METHODS: A cohort of 79 consecutive GIST cases treated at the Karolinska University Hospital, who were without metastasis at diagnosis and who had not received any pre-or postoperative treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, was included. Surgical margins were evaluated at the time of surgery and classified as wide, marginal or intralesional. Time to local/peritoneal recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival were recorded. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between surgical margin, and recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Local/peritoneal recurrence was diagnosed in 2/39 cases with wide margins, in 7/22 cases with marginal margins, and in 13/18 cases with intralesional surgery. Compared to wide margins this gives a hazard ratio of 6.8 (confidence interval 1.4–32.7) for marginal margins and 13.5 (3–61) for intralesional margins. In multivariate analysis, adjusting for size, site, and mitotic index, surgical margin remained an independent significant predictor of risk for recurrence. When classifying patients according to R0/R1 surgery, patients with R0 surgery showed longer time to peritoneal recurrence and better recurrence-free and disease-specific survival as compared to those with R1 resection. However, when excluding patients operated with wide surgical margin, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION: Wide surgical margins are of significant prognostic importance, supporting the strategy of en bloc resection with good margin and careful handling of the tumor to avoid damaging the peritoneal surface in surgical resection of GIST. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4498-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60607892018-08-09 Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Åhlén, Jan Karlsson, Fredrik Wejde, Johan Nilsson, Inga-Lena Larsson, Catharina Bränström, Robert World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is still the main treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and R0 excision, regardless of surgical margins, is considered sufficient. METHODS: A cohort of 79 consecutive GIST cases treated at the Karolinska University Hospital, who were without metastasis at diagnosis and who had not received any pre-or postoperative treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, was included. Surgical margins were evaluated at the time of surgery and classified as wide, marginal or intralesional. Time to local/peritoneal recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival were recorded. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between surgical margin, and recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Local/peritoneal recurrence was diagnosed in 2/39 cases with wide margins, in 7/22 cases with marginal margins, and in 13/18 cases with intralesional surgery. Compared to wide margins this gives a hazard ratio of 6.8 (confidence interval 1.4–32.7) for marginal margins and 13.5 (3–61) for intralesional margins. In multivariate analysis, adjusting for size, site, and mitotic index, surgical margin remained an independent significant predictor of risk for recurrence. When classifying patients according to R0/R1 surgery, patients with R0 surgery showed longer time to peritoneal recurrence and better recurrence-free and disease-specific survival as compared to those with R1 resection. However, when excluding patients operated with wide surgical margin, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION: Wide surgical margins are of significant prognostic importance, supporting the strategy of en bloc resection with good margin and careful handling of the tumor to avoid damaging the peritoneal surface in surgical resection of GIST. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4498-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060789/ /pubmed/29435627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4498-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Åhlén, Jan
Karlsson, Fredrik
Wejde, Johan
Nilsson, Inga-Lena
Larsson, Catharina
Bränström, Robert
Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title_full Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title_fullStr Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title_full_unstemmed Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title_short Wide Surgical Margin Improves the Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)
title_sort wide surgical margin improves the outcome for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gists)
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4498-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ahlenjan widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists
AT karlssonfredrik widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists
AT wejdejohan widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists
AT nilssoningalena widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists
AT larssoncatharina widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists
AT branstromrobert widesurgicalmarginimprovestheoutcomeforpatientswithgastrointestinalstromaltumorsgists