Cargando…

Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon

BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonesson, Linda, Boffard, Kenneth, Lundberg, Lars, Rydmark, Martin, Karlgren, Klas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x
_version_ 1783342087857504256
author Sonesson, Linda
Boffard, Kenneth
Lundberg, Lars
Rydmark, Martin
Karlgren, Klas
author_facet Sonesson, Linda
Boffard, Kenneth
Lundberg, Lars
Rydmark, Martin
Karlgren, Klas
author_sort Sonesson, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a lack of expertise, experience, and a low trauma volume, as well as a lack of research, with limited support as to the decision-making and teaching challenges present. We studied what experienced trauma experts describe as the challenges that are specific to the advanced surgical decision-making required, whether civilian, humanitarian, or military. METHODS: Design-based research using combined methods including interviews, reviews of authentic trauma cases, and video-recorded resuscitations performed at a high-volume civilian academic trauma center. RESULTS: Several educational dilemmas were identified: (1) thinking physiologically, (2) the application of damage control resuscitation and surgery, (3) differing priorities and time management, (4) impact of environment, (5) managing limited resources, (6) lack of general surgical skills, (7) different cultural behavior, and (8) ethical issues. CONCLUSION: The challenges presented, and the educational domains identified, constitute a basis for improved development of education and training in complex surgical decision-making. This study contributes new knowledge about the mindset required for decision-making in patients with complex multisystem trauma and competing priorities of care. This is, especially important in countries having a low intensity of trauma in both military and civilian environments, and consequential limited skills, and lack of expertise. Guidelines focused on the same decision-making process, using virtual patients and blended learning, can be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60607972018-08-09 Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon Sonesson, Linda Boffard, Kenneth Lundberg, Lars Rydmark, Martin Karlgren, Klas World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a lack of expertise, experience, and a low trauma volume, as well as a lack of research, with limited support as to the decision-making and teaching challenges present. We studied what experienced trauma experts describe as the challenges that are specific to the advanced surgical decision-making required, whether civilian, humanitarian, or military. METHODS: Design-based research using combined methods including interviews, reviews of authentic trauma cases, and video-recorded resuscitations performed at a high-volume civilian academic trauma center. RESULTS: Several educational dilemmas were identified: (1) thinking physiologically, (2) the application of damage control resuscitation and surgery, (3) differing priorities and time management, (4) impact of environment, (5) managing limited resources, (6) lack of general surgical skills, (7) different cultural behavior, and (8) ethical issues. CONCLUSION: The challenges presented, and the educational domains identified, constitute a basis for improved development of education and training in complex surgical decision-making. This study contributes new knowledge about the mindset required for decision-making in patients with complex multisystem trauma and competing priorities of care. This is, especially important in countries having a low intensity of trauma in both military and civilian environments, and consequential limited skills, and lack of expertise. Guidelines focused on the same decision-making process, using virtual patients and blended learning, can be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060797/ /pubmed/29340725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Sonesson, Linda
Boffard, Kenneth
Lundberg, Lars
Rydmark, Martin
Karlgren, Klas
Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title_full Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title_fullStr Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title_short Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
title_sort decision-making in management of the complex trauma patient: changing the mindset of the non-trauma surgeon
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sonessonlinda decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon
AT boffardkenneth decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon
AT lundberglars decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon
AT rydmarkmartin decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon
AT karlgrenklas decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon