Cargando…
Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon
BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x |
_version_ | 1783342087857504256 |
---|---|
author | Sonesson, Linda Boffard, Kenneth Lundberg, Lars Rydmark, Martin Karlgren, Klas |
author_facet | Sonesson, Linda Boffard, Kenneth Lundberg, Lars Rydmark, Martin Karlgren, Klas |
author_sort | Sonesson, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a lack of expertise, experience, and a low trauma volume, as well as a lack of research, with limited support as to the decision-making and teaching challenges present. We studied what experienced trauma experts describe as the challenges that are specific to the advanced surgical decision-making required, whether civilian, humanitarian, or military. METHODS: Design-based research using combined methods including interviews, reviews of authentic trauma cases, and video-recorded resuscitations performed at a high-volume civilian academic trauma center. RESULTS: Several educational dilemmas were identified: (1) thinking physiologically, (2) the application of damage control resuscitation and surgery, (3) differing priorities and time management, (4) impact of environment, (5) managing limited resources, (6) lack of general surgical skills, (7) different cultural behavior, and (8) ethical issues. CONCLUSION: The challenges presented, and the educational domains identified, constitute a basis for improved development of education and training in complex surgical decision-making. This study contributes new knowledge about the mindset required for decision-making in patients with complex multisystem trauma and competing priorities of care. This is, especially important in countries having a low intensity of trauma in both military and civilian environments, and consequential limited skills, and lack of expertise. Guidelines focused on the same decision-making process, using virtual patients and blended learning, can be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60607972018-08-09 Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon Sonesson, Linda Boffard, Kenneth Lundberg, Lars Rydmark, Martin Karlgren, Klas World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: European surgeons are frequently subspecialized and trained primarily in elective surgical techniques. As trauma leaders, they may occasionally have to deal with complex polytrauma, advanced management techniques, differing priorities, and the need for multidisciplinary care. There is a lack of expertise, experience, and a low trauma volume, as well as a lack of research, with limited support as to the decision-making and teaching challenges present. We studied what experienced trauma experts describe as the challenges that are specific to the advanced surgical decision-making required, whether civilian, humanitarian, or military. METHODS: Design-based research using combined methods including interviews, reviews of authentic trauma cases, and video-recorded resuscitations performed at a high-volume civilian academic trauma center. RESULTS: Several educational dilemmas were identified: (1) thinking physiologically, (2) the application of damage control resuscitation and surgery, (3) differing priorities and time management, (4) impact of environment, (5) managing limited resources, (6) lack of general surgical skills, (7) different cultural behavior, and (8) ethical issues. CONCLUSION: The challenges presented, and the educational domains identified, constitute a basis for improved development of education and training in complex surgical decision-making. This study contributes new knowledge about the mindset required for decision-making in patients with complex multisystem trauma and competing priorities of care. This is, especially important in countries having a low intensity of trauma in both military and civilian environments, and consequential limited skills, and lack of expertise. Guidelines focused on the same decision-making process, using virtual patients and blended learning, can be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060797/ /pubmed/29340725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Report Sonesson, Linda Boffard, Kenneth Lundberg, Lars Rydmark, Martin Karlgren, Klas Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title | Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title_full | Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title_fullStr | Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title_short | Decision-Making in Management of the Complex Trauma Patient: Changing the Mindset of the non-trauma Surgeon |
title_sort | decision-making in management of the complex trauma patient: changing the mindset of the non-trauma surgeon |
topic | Original Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonessonlinda decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon AT boffardkenneth decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon AT lundberglars decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon AT rydmarkmartin decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon AT karlgrenklas decisionmakinginmanagementofthecomplextraumapatientchangingthemindsetofthenontraumasurgeon |