Cargando…

The gentamicin-collagen implant and the risk of distant metastases of rectal cancer following short-course radiotherapy and curative resection: the long-term outcomes of a randomized study

PURPOSE: A previous randomized study conducted by our group showed that application of gentamicin-collagen implant (GCI) into the pelvic cavity after total mesorectal excision (TME) reduced the incidence of distant metastases. Therefore, we decided to conduct a confirmatory study. METHODS: Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutkowski, Andrzej, Pietrzak, Lucyna, Kryński, Jacek, Zając, Leszek, Bednarczyk, Mariusz, Olesiński, Tomasz, Szpakowski, Marek, Saramak, Piotr, Pierzankowski, Ireneusz, Hevelke, Piotr, Surowski, Piotr, Bujko, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29656304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3045-3
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: A previous randomized study conducted by our group showed that application of gentamicin-collagen implant (GCI) into the pelvic cavity after total mesorectal excision (TME) reduced the incidence of distant metastases. Therefore, we decided to conduct a confirmatory study. METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer were included in the study if they met the following criteria: adenocarcinoma of the rectum, preoperative short-term radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy), and WHO performance score 0–1. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned either to an experimental group in which GCI was applied (n = 81) or to a control group without GCI (n = 81). Median follow-up was 80 months. Cumulative incidence of distant metastases at 5 years was higher in the control group compared to the experimental group: 23.5 vs 8.6% (HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.1–5.5], P = 0.005). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) did not differ between the experimental group and the control group: HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.55–1.70], P = 0.864; HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.50–1.45], P = 0.548, and HR 0.5 [95%CI 0.22–1.22], P = 0.093, respectively. The predefined by the protocol subgroup analysis for yp stage III disease showed better DFS in the experimental group compared to the control group; HR 0.47 [95%CI 0.23–0.97], P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed our previous finding that GCI applied in the pelvis significantly reduced the rate of distant metastases in patients after radical rectal cancer resection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00384-018-3045-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.