Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The pathological and prognostic importance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in rectal cancer, as a sub-population of colorectal cancer, is unknown. A meta-analysis was preformed to estimate the prognostic significance of CIMP in rectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic search was perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kokelaar, R. F., Jones, H., Beynon, J., Evans, M. E., Harris, D. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29926233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3108-5
_version_ 1783342094152105984
author Kokelaar, R. F.
Jones, H.
Beynon, J.
Evans, M. E.
Harris, D. A.
author_facet Kokelaar, R. F.
Jones, H.
Beynon, J.
Evans, M. E.
Harris, D. A.
author_sort Kokelaar, R. F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The pathological and prognostic importance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in rectal cancer, as a sub-population of colorectal cancer, is unknown. A meta-analysis was preformed to estimate the prognostic significance of CIMP in rectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Cochrane electronic databases for articles pertaining to CIMP and rectal cancer. Articles were analysed and data extracted according to PRISMA standards. RESULTS: Six studies including 1529 patients were included in the analysis. Following dichotomisation, the prevalence of CIMP-positive tumours was 10 to 57%, with a median of 12.5%. Meta-analysis demonstrated the pooled odds ratio for all-cause death for CIMP-positive tumours vs CIMP-negative tumours was 1.24 (95% CI 0.88–1.74). Z test for overall effect was 1.21 (p = 0.23). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (X(2) 5.96, df 5, p = 0.31, I(2) = 16%). A total of 15 different loci were used for assessing CIMP across the studies, with a median of 6.5 loci (range 5–8). CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between CIMP and poor outcomes in rectal cancer was demonstrated. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in CIMP assessment methodologies and in study populations. Rectal cancer datasets were frequently not extractable from larger colorectal cohorts, limiting analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60608252018-08-09 Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer Kokelaar, R. F. Jones, H. Beynon, J. Evans, M. E. Harris, D. A. Int J Colorectal Dis Review PURPOSE: The pathological and prognostic importance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in rectal cancer, as a sub-population of colorectal cancer, is unknown. A meta-analysis was preformed to estimate the prognostic significance of CIMP in rectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Cochrane electronic databases for articles pertaining to CIMP and rectal cancer. Articles were analysed and data extracted according to PRISMA standards. RESULTS: Six studies including 1529 patients were included in the analysis. Following dichotomisation, the prevalence of CIMP-positive tumours was 10 to 57%, with a median of 12.5%. Meta-analysis demonstrated the pooled odds ratio for all-cause death for CIMP-positive tumours vs CIMP-negative tumours was 1.24 (95% CI 0.88–1.74). Z test for overall effect was 1.21 (p = 0.23). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (X(2) 5.96, df 5, p = 0.31, I(2) = 16%). A total of 15 different loci were used for assessing CIMP across the studies, with a median of 6.5 loci (range 5–8). CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between CIMP and poor outcomes in rectal cancer was demonstrated. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in CIMP assessment methodologies and in study populations. Rectal cancer datasets were frequently not extractable from larger colorectal cohorts, limiting analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060825/ /pubmed/29926233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3108-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Kokelaar, R. F.
Jones, H.
Beynon, J.
Evans, M. E.
Harris, D. A.
Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title_full Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title_short Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
title_sort meta-analysis of the prognostic value of cpg island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29926233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3108-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kokelaarrf metaanalysisoftheprognosticvalueofcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeinrectalcancer
AT jonesh metaanalysisoftheprognosticvalueofcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeinrectalcancer
AT beynonj metaanalysisoftheprognosticvalueofcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeinrectalcancer
AT evansme metaanalysisoftheprognosticvalueofcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeinrectalcancer
AT harrisda metaanalysisoftheprognosticvalueofcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeinrectalcancer