Cargando…
Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries
INTRODUCTION: Timely, precise, and relevant communication between hospital-based clinicians and primary care physicians post-discharge (DC) ensures quality transitions, thereby reducing patient safety incidents and preventing readmission. At the present time there is limited knowledge of elements of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090783 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_407_16 |
_version_ | 1783342107378843648 |
---|---|
author | Savvopoulos, Stavros Sampalli, Tara Harding, Ruth Blackmore, Gail Janes, Sandra Kumanan, Kothai Gibson, Rick MacKnight, Chris |
author_facet | Savvopoulos, Stavros Sampalli, Tara Harding, Ruth Blackmore, Gail Janes, Sandra Kumanan, Kothai Gibson, Rick MacKnight, Chris |
author_sort | Savvopoulos, Stavros |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Timely, precise, and relevant communication between hospital-based clinicians and primary care physicians post-discharge (DC) ensures quality transitions, thereby reducing patient safety incidents and preventing readmission. At the present time there is limited knowledge of elements of quality or methods to score the quality criteria in the context of DC summaries. The Nova Scotia Health Authority, a provincial health system responsible for the delivery of services in a small Canadian province, embarked on a system-level approach to the standardization of DC summaries in an effort to improve quality and safety at care transitions from hospital to primary care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review to retrieve items relevant to quality in DC summaries, retrospective audit of charts, a consensus development process, and, finally, validation of a scoring tool were conducted in order to develop a quality scoring tool for DC summaries. RESULTS: Relevant items were identified through the literature review and consensus development process. Corresponding definitions that were established assisted the development of the quality criteria, which were subsequently used to score the quality of DC summaries in our organization. CONCLUSION: The scoring tool developed through this work will be applied to help us gain a more in-depth understanding of quality in DC summaries and support the development of suitable education and quality processes in the health authority that can best support safe care transitions for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60609112018-08-08 Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries Savvopoulos, Stavros Sampalli, Tara Harding, Ruth Blackmore, Gail Janes, Sandra Kumanan, Kothai Gibson, Rick MacKnight, Chris J Family Med Prim Care Original Article INTRODUCTION: Timely, precise, and relevant communication between hospital-based clinicians and primary care physicians post-discharge (DC) ensures quality transitions, thereby reducing patient safety incidents and preventing readmission. At the present time there is limited knowledge of elements of quality or methods to score the quality criteria in the context of DC summaries. The Nova Scotia Health Authority, a provincial health system responsible for the delivery of services in a small Canadian province, embarked on a system-level approach to the standardization of DC summaries in an effort to improve quality and safety at care transitions from hospital to primary care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review to retrieve items relevant to quality in DC summaries, retrospective audit of charts, a consensus development process, and, finally, validation of a scoring tool were conducted in order to develop a quality scoring tool for DC summaries. RESULTS: Relevant items were identified through the literature review and consensus development process. Corresponding definitions that were established assisted the development of the quality criteria, which were subsequently used to score the quality of DC summaries in our organization. CONCLUSION: The scoring tool developed through this work will be applied to help us gain a more in-depth understanding of quality in DC summaries and support the development of suitable education and quality processes in the health authority that can best support safe care transitions for patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060911/ /pubmed/30090783 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_407_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Savvopoulos, Stavros Sampalli, Tara Harding, Ruth Blackmore, Gail Janes, Sandra Kumanan, Kothai Gibson, Rick MacKnight, Chris Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title | Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title_full | Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title_fullStr | Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title_short | Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
title_sort | development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090783 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_407_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savvopoulosstavros developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT sampallitara developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT hardingruth developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT blackmoregail developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT janessandra developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT kumanankothai developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT gibsonrick developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries AT macknightchris developmentofaqualityscoringtooltoassessqualityofdischargesummaries |