Cargando…

Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat

BACKGROUND: The prescription error is a failure in the prescription writing process leading to wrong instructions about the identity of the recipient, the identity of the drug, the formulation, dose, route, timing, frequency, and duration of administration. This study is an effort directed to find e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kothari, Nitin, Joshi, Anuradha, Buch, Jatin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_424_16
_version_ 1783342109306126336
author Kothari, Nitin
Joshi, Anuradha
Buch, Jatin
author_facet Kothari, Nitin
Joshi, Anuradha
Buch, Jatin
author_sort Kothari, Nitin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prescription error is a failure in the prescription writing process leading to wrong instructions about the identity of the recipient, the identity of the drug, the formulation, dose, route, timing, frequency, and duration of administration. This study is an effort directed to find errors in prescription writing and interventions to improve on such error-prone practices of prescription writing. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted to analyze the prescription writing errors in the outpatient department in the rural area of Anand district of Central Gujarat. Prescriptions were collected from two nearby rural areas of Anand city-Petlad and Anklav. The prescription copies so-obtained were analyzed as per the WHO guidelines for “Prescription Writing Errors.” RESULTS: Overall, 191 prescriptions were collected from both rural areas in the study. The highest number of prescriptions was collected from general practitioners, followed by surgeons and gynecologists. Name, qualification, and address of prescribers were mentioned in all the prescriptions while registration number was mentioned only in 14.10% of prescriptions. The esoteric symbol was mentioned in 63% of prescriptions. Prescribers signed their prescription only in 48% of prescriptions. A total of 420 drugs were prescribed to the patients in the study. All but one drug were prescribed by brand name. Dosage form and route of administration of drugs were mentioned in >60% of drugs. CONCLUSION: Most medical schools provide some training in prescribing to medical undergraduates; however, this training is perceived to be suboptimal by medical students and junior doctors. Such training programs are the need of the hour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60609192018-08-08 Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat Kothari, Nitin Joshi, Anuradha Buch, Jatin J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The prescription error is a failure in the prescription writing process leading to wrong instructions about the identity of the recipient, the identity of the drug, the formulation, dose, route, timing, frequency, and duration of administration. This study is an effort directed to find errors in prescription writing and interventions to improve on such error-prone practices of prescription writing. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted to analyze the prescription writing errors in the outpatient department in the rural area of Anand district of Central Gujarat. Prescriptions were collected from two nearby rural areas of Anand city-Petlad and Anklav. The prescription copies so-obtained were analyzed as per the WHO guidelines for “Prescription Writing Errors.” RESULTS: Overall, 191 prescriptions were collected from both rural areas in the study. The highest number of prescriptions was collected from general practitioners, followed by surgeons and gynecologists. Name, qualification, and address of prescribers were mentioned in all the prescriptions while registration number was mentioned only in 14.10% of prescriptions. The esoteric symbol was mentioned in 63% of prescriptions. Prescribers signed their prescription only in 48% of prescriptions. A total of 420 drugs were prescribed to the patients in the study. All but one drug were prescribed by brand name. Dosage form and route of administration of drugs were mentioned in >60% of drugs. CONCLUSION: Most medical schools provide some training in prescribing to medical undergraduates; however, this training is perceived to be suboptimal by medical students and junior doctors. Such training programs are the need of the hour. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060919/ /pubmed/30090784 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_424_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kothari, Nitin
Joshi, Anuradha
Buch, Jatin
Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title_full Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title_fullStr Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title_short Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat
title_sort evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central gujarat
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_424_16
work_keys_str_mv AT kotharinitin evaluationofoutpatientprescriptionsinruralpartofcentralgujarat
AT joshianuradha evaluationofoutpatientprescriptionsinruralpartofcentralgujarat
AT buchjatin evaluationofoutpatientprescriptionsinruralpartofcentralgujarat